-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Terre Haute, Indiana
24 May 2007
As part of our continuing series on "Searching for Solutions", VOA traveled to Terre Haute, Indiana, to tour one of two so called "clean coal" electric generating plants in the United States. Clean coal technology has been under development since the early 1990s in the U.S.. And in the next few years, 20 more plants will be built in different parts of the country. Jeff Swicord reports.
Toxic1 emission2 from coal" hspace="2" src="/upimg/allimg/070607/0906190.jpg" width="210" vspace="2" border="0" /> |
Toxic emission from coal |
For decades, coal-fired power plants across the country have emitted a variety of dangerous toxic substances that harm the environment. They include large amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) that contribute to global warming. But new "clean coal" technology is on the horizon that can dramatically reduce the toxic emissions3 from coal-fired plants.
"From DOE's perspective, I think clean coal is part of the future," says Jared Daniels, with the Office of Clean Coal Technology at the U.S. Department of Energy.. "There is no silver bullet in energy technologies. If you look at all the various forecasts, some time around 2050, electricity demand in the U.S. is going to double."
The Wabash Valley Power plant in Terre Haute, Indiana, is one of two Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle, or IGCC, plants in the U.S. IGCC technology converts coal into synthetic4 gas by heating it at very high temperature in this tall cylinder5.
The pollutants6, sulfur7 and carbon dioxide (CO2), are removed and sold as products on the open market. Another byproduct, slag8 (a non-toxic solid material left over from the gasification process) can be used in building materials and asphalt for roads. There are two types of turbines that generate electricity in the IGCC system: one that runs on the natural gas, and another that runs on steam from the heat created from the heat of the gasification process.
"The advantage is that because you gasify the coal, you can clean up the contaminants as we discussed much more efficiently9 as they are more concentrated," adds Daniels, "and on the power side, because you have a gas turbine that is more efficient than a steam turbine in series with a steam turbine, the overall efficiency of the process is increased."
Not everyone thinks coal should be considered as a viable10 future energy source. "Calling coal clean is just propaganda to keep this dirty energy source into the mix for the future" says Eric Pica, a representative of the environmental group Friends of the Earth.
He acknowledges that the IGCC process produces far fewer pollutants than traditional coal-fired plants, but he says pollution is only part of the problem. "The problem is that these plants are getting their coal from somewhere. They are getting their coal from the mountaintops of West Virginia, which are being blown apart and scraped out like a pumpkin11 and filling thousands of miles of streambeds. They are getting their coal from the mining of strip mines out west."
Pica adds that the power industry plans to build 150 coal-powered plants across the country in the next few years. Only 20 of them will be IGCC plants. "The IGCC plants are being used to put a green spin on all these coal plants that are going to be built, that are going to use pulverized12 coal with all the traditional pollution from the coal."
IGCC plants are expensive to build. Jared Daniels acknowledges that until stringent13 emission standards are placed on coal-fired plants, there will be little economic incentive14 for power companies to build IGCC plants.
He says IGCC technology is currently the best option for coal-generated electricity. "We will need to rely on coal for the a long time going out into the future. Perhaps some of the renewable technologies [will] come of age and can gain a larger share of the market.
"I think when you realize that fact, you develop technology and implement15 technology that uses coal in the most efficient and environmentally sound manner possible," adds Daniels.
1 toxic | |
adj.有毒的,因中毒引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 emission | |
n.发出物,散发物;发出,散发 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 synthetic | |
adj.合成的,人工的;综合的;n.人工制品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 cylinder | |
n.圆筒,柱(面),汽缸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 pollutants | |
污染物质(尤指工业废物)( pollutant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 sulfur | |
n.硫,硫磺(=sulphur) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 slag | |
n.熔渣,铁屑,矿渣;v.使变成熔渣,变熔渣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 efficiently | |
adv.高效率地,有能力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 viable | |
adj.可行的,切实可行的,能活下去的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pumpkin | |
n.南瓜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 pulverized | |
adj.[医]雾化的,粉末状的v.将…弄碎( pulverize的过去式和过去分词 );将…弄成粉末或尘埃;摧毁;粉碎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 stringent | |
adj.严厉的;令人信服的;银根紧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 incentive | |
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 implement | |
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|