-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Capitol Hill
25 July 2007
The legal confrontation1 between President Bush and Congress over documents and other information sought by lawmakers could soon escalate2. VOA's Dan Robinson reports, the House Judiciary Committee meets later Wednesday to vote on whether to cite one current and one former White House official for contempt of Congress, in a constitutional standoff likely to end up in the courts.
The Democratic-controlled House judiciary panel, and its Senate counterpart, have moved steadily3 closer to an all-out constitutional clash with the White House over investigations4 into the firing of eight U.S. federal prosecutors5.
Although prosecutors are subject to replacement6 at any time under any administration, some of those dismissed told Congress earlier this year that they received inappropriate contacts from Republican lawmakers or staff about criminal investigations.
George Bush |
Democrats9 pressed ahead with subpoenas11 to compel the White House to provide documents and other material, and allow testimony12 by current and former White House aides.
Acting13 on behalf of President Bush, White House lawyers claimed executive privilege, asserting that there is no requirement to share information concerning internal administration deliberations with Congress or permit testimony.
In another step last week, the White House announced it would not allow the Justice Department to prosecute14 members of the executive branch for contempt of Congress.
After one former White House aide, Harriet Miers, failed to show up, a House judiciary subcommittee formally ruled White House explanations legally invalid15.
Congresswoman Linda Sanchez said White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten, who is the subject of a subpoena10, is required to produce documents.
"The White House is refusing not only to produce documents pursuant to the subpoena, but also to even explain why the documents are being withheld," she said. "In effect, the White House is asking Congress and the American people to simply trust on blind faith that the documents are appropriately being kept secret. Our system of government does not permit the White House to demand this type of blind faith and secrecy16."
Republicans accuse Democrats of engaging in a political charade17 designed to damage the president.
"It is a core responsibility of Congress to oversee18 the executive branch," said Congressman19 Chris Cannon20, the ranking Republican on the subcommittee. "But after all the investigations we have done on this matter, it is resulted in no evidence of wrongdoing in the removal of the U.S. attorneys. Instead, we have damaged the Justice Department, diminished Congress, and have landed at the threshold of contempt proceedings21 against Harriet Miers and the White House."
Alberto Gonzales testifies on Capitol Hill before Senate Judiciary Committee, 24 July 2007 |
Gonzales, who has President Bush's support, has resisted calls for his resignation, pledging to fix problems at the Department of Justice emanating22 from he calls mistakes under his watch.
Senate judiciary chairman Pat Leahy had this exchange with the attorney general.
Leahy: If a house of Congress certified23 a contempt citation24 against former or current officials for failing to appear or comply with a congressional subpoena, would you permit the U.S. attorney to carry out the law to refer the matter to a grand jury and therefore fulfill25 the constitutional duty to faithfully execute the law, or would you block the execution of the law?
Gonzales: Mr. chairman, your question relates to an ongoing26 controversy which I am recused from. I am not going to answer that question.
Leahy: Is there anybody left in the Department of Justice who could answer the question?
Gonzales: Of course there is.
Leahy: Who?
Gonzales: With respect to these kinds of decisions it would be made by the solicitor27 general.
Gonzales received this warning from the ranking Senate committee Republican Arlen Specter
"The chairman has already said that the committee is going to review your testimony very carefully, to see if your credibility has not been breached28 to the point of being actionable," he said.
Specter termed patently unreasonable29 the White House's continuing insistence30 that any testimony take place without transcripts31, although he held out hope that Congress and the White House can reach some accommodation.
Referring to the administration's order blocking Justice Department action on a potential congressional contempt citation, Senator Leahy warned Gonzales that questions about alleged32 executive branch lying to Congress, perjury33, or destruction of evidence or obstruction34 of justice would soon be "real issues [and] not just debating points."
1 confrontation | |
n.对抗,对峙,冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 escalate | |
v.(使)逐步增长(或发展),(使)逐步升级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 steadily | |
adv.稳定地;不变地;持续地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 replacement | |
n.取代,替换,交换;替代品,代用品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 subpoenas | |
n.(传唤出庭的)传票( subpoena的名词复数 )v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 prosecute | |
vt.告发;进行;vi.告发,起诉,作检察官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 invalid | |
n.病人,伤残人;adj.有病的,伤残的;无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 secrecy | |
n.秘密,保密,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 charade | |
n.用动作等表演文字意义的字谜游戏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 oversee | |
vt.监督,管理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 cannon | |
n.大炮,火炮;飞机上的机关炮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 emanating | |
v.从…处传出,传出( emanate的现在分词 );产生,表现,显示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 certified | |
a.经证明合格的;具有证明文件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 citation | |
n.引用,引证,引用文;传票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 fulfill | |
vt.履行,实现,完成;满足,使满意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 solicitor | |
n.初级律师,事务律师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 breached | |
攻破( breach的现在分词 ); 破坏,违反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 unreasonable | |
adj.不讲道理的,不合情理的,过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 insistence | |
n.坚持;强调;坚决主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 transcripts | |
n.抄本( transcript的名词复数 );转写本;文字本;副本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 perjury | |
n.伪证;伪证罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 obstruction | |
n.阻塞,堵塞;障碍物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|