-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
By Dan Robinson
Capitol Hill
04 November 2009
A cloud of smoke billows from the Gaza Strip following an Israeli strikes as seen from the Israel-Gaza border, 15 Jan 2009
The U.S. House of Representatives has overwhelmingly passed a resolution condemning1 a report by a United Nations fact-finding panel that criticized Israel as part of an assessment2 of the conflict in Gaza in 2008 between Israel and Hamas. House lawmakers approved the symbolic3 measure by a vote of 344 to 36.
In its report, the U.N. panel headed by South African Judge Richard Goldstone said Israeli forces and Palestinian Hamas forces committed violations4 of international law, including war crimes, during the 22-day conflict which left 1400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis dead.
Among its recommendations, the panel said Israel, and Hamas which controls Gaza, should face potential prosecution5 in The Hague if they do not conduct independent and credible6 investigations7 within six months.
But the report provoked angry reaction in Congress, where many lawmakers condemned8 it as biased9, while others asserted it contained balanced criticism of Israel and Hamas.
The House resolution calls the commission's report irredeemably biased and unworthy of further consideration or legitimacy10 and urges the Obama administration, which has already condemned it, to strongly oppose its endorsement11 by the United Nations.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer was among Democrats12 and Republicans characterizing the Goldstone report as biased, and taking aim at the U.N. Human Rights Council which established its mandates13.
"The Human Rights Council mandates for the report specifically targeted Israeli actions, ignoring, ignoring the deliberate Hamas attacks on civilians14 [in Israel] that provoked Israel's self-defense15 in Operation Cast Lead [Israeli military operation in Gaza in 2008," said Steny Hoyer.
However, Republicans and Democratic opponents said the resolution itself was biased, asserting that by passing it the House would be demonstrating it wants to cover up the truth about actions in Gaza by both Hamas and Israel.
Democratic Representative Betty McCollum:
"This resolution is blatantly16 biased and it damages U.S. credibility," said Betty McCollum. "This resolution seeks to hide the ugliness of the Gaza war by covering up violent excesses committed against innocent civilians by both Hamas and the Israeli Defense [Forces]."
Republican Representative David Price asserted that passage would also complicate17 U.S. efforts for peace between Israelis and Palestinians, and negatively impact Israel's own investigations:
"Israel is a strong and resilient democracy," saidd David Price. "Successfully investigating this episode could only make it stronger, but we shouldn't pass this resolution now which could actually hinder the wheels of justice before they have ever begun to turn."
Richard Goldstone, who headed the U.N. inquiry18, wrote last week to the Democratic chairman and senior Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Howard Berman and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, demanding changes to correct what he called serious factual inaccuracies.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman (file photo)
Though he and Ros-Lehtinen agreed to some changes, Congressman19 Berman asserted that the commission's conclusions remain flawed. He said lawmakers needed to voice a position before Wednesday's U.N. General Assembly consideration of a resolution supported by Arab countries on the Goldstone report.
"The fact is, I truly believe the report is flawed," said Howard Berman.
Israel and the United States have urged foreign governments to vote against the resolution on the Goldstone report.
Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have called for implementation20 of its recommendations. Human Rights Watch urged U.S lawmakers to vote against resolution in the House of Representatives.
Besides urging the Obama administration to oppose any further consideration of the Goldstone report in multi-lateral forums21, or measures stemming from it, the resolution also reaffirms support for Israel's security and right to self-defense, and its right to defend its citizens from violent militant22 groups and their state sponsors.
1 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 assessment | |
n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 violations | |
违反( violation的名词复数 ); 冒犯; 违反(行为、事例); 强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 credible | |
adj.可信任的,可靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 biased | |
a.有偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 legitimacy | |
n.合法,正当 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 endorsement | |
n.背书;赞成,认可,担保;签(注),批注 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mandates | |
托管(mandate的第三人称单数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 blatantly | |
ad.公开地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 complicate | |
vt.使复杂化,使混乱,使难懂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 inquiry | |
n.打听,询问,调查,查问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 implementation | |
n.实施,贯彻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 forums | |
讨论会; 座谈会; 广播专题讲话节目; 集会的公共场所( forum的名词复数 ); 论坛,讨论会,专题讨论节目; 法庭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 militant | |
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|