-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Opinions remain sharply divided in Congress as President Obama says a new plan will address every aspect of US strategy in the war
Michael Bowman | Washington 22 November 2009
Democratic Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania (File)
"I do not believe we ought to add troops in Afghanistan unless it is indispensable in our war against al-Qaida," says Democratic Senator Arlen Specter
As U.S. President Barack Obama nears an anticipated decision on America's future engagement in Afghanistan, opinions remain sharply divided in Congress, which would provide funding for the mission.
Weeks have passed since President Obama's top commander in Afghanistan formally urged the White House to order a swift surge of U.S. troops to battle militant1 extremists in the violence-plagued nation. President Obama has promised to unveil a detailed2 plan for Afghanistan in coming weeks, one that he says will address every aspect of U.S. strategy in the war and put the United States and its NATO allies on a path to victory.
But what the White House sees as a necessary, thoughtful process to arrive at the best-possible decision on an eight-year conflict is seen as dangerous "dithering" [delay] by Republican legislators. Senator Lamar Alexander of Tennessee spoke3 on Fox News Sunday.
"He [Obama] should show a sense of urgency and come up to Congress and tell us exactly what he plans to do," said Alexander.
Fellow-Republican Senator Kit4 Bond of Missouri blasted the president for recent comments in which he stressed the need for an exit strategy from Afghanistan.
"Now saying we are going in with a plan of getting out tells not only our troops that we are unsure about [U.S.] support [for the mission], but it tells the people of Afghanistan that the United States does not have the will to stay,” said Bond. “We have to win the confidence of the people of Afghanistan."
But not everyone believes that more U.S. troops, however rapidly deployed5, will assure the defeat of Taliban militants6 and deny terrorists a safe haven7 from which to plan attacks on Western targets. Among the skeptics is Democratic Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who also appeared on Fox News Sunday.
"I do not believe we ought to add troops in Afghanistan unless it is indispensable in our war against al-Qaida,” said Specter. “If it is, then we have to do whatever it takes because al-Qaida is out to annihilate8 us. If they can organize as well in Yemen or Somalia or someplace else, then why fight in Afghanistan where no one [outside force] has been successful for millennia9?"
U.S. public-opinion surveys show declining support for the war in Afghanistan. Many analysts10 believe President Obama will order additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan, but the total will be less than the 40,000 troops requested by his top commander in the country, General Stanley McChrystal.
1 militant | |
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 kit | |
n.用具包,成套工具;随身携带物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 deployed | |
(尤指军事行动)使展开( deploy的过去式和过去分词 ); 施展; 部署; 有效地利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 militants | |
激进分子,好斗分子( militant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 haven | |
n.安全的地方,避难所,庇护所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 annihilate | |
v.使无效;毁灭;取消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 millennia | |
n.一千年,千禧年 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|