-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcomes the increase, which will bring US troops strength in Afghanistan to around 100,000
Sonja Pace | London 02 December 2009
Watch: Sonja Pace video report
Windows Media
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, London, 2 Dec 2009
"I think the whole House will welcome the announcement by President Obama - both of the objectives to the mission in relation to the Taliban and in relation to al Qaida, but also the numbers of troops, a very substantial part of which will go into Helmand province and will be an assistance in dealing1 with the Taliban insurgency2 there," said Gordon Brown, British PM
There has been initial positive reaction from Europe and NATO to President Barack Obama's announcement that he will send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban and al Qaida.
It was a long and eagerly-awaited decision - certainly in Britain, the second-largest contributor of troops to Afghanistan.
"As Commander in Chief, I have determined3 that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan," said President Obama. "After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home."
Speaking in the House of Commons Wednesday, Prime Minister Gordon Brown welcomed the increase, which will bring U.S. troops strength in Afghanistan to around 100,000.
"I think the whole House will welcome the announcement by President Obama - both of the objectives to the mission in relation to the Taliban and in relation to al Qaida, but also the numbers of troops, a very substantial part of which will go into Helmand province and will be an assistance in dealing with the Taliban insurgency there," said Mr. brown.
Britain has 9,500 troops in Afghanistan, including Special Forces, and Mr. Brown promised 500 more earlier in the week.
But it is not just U.S. and British forces involved, about 40 other countries have sent troops under the banner of NATO.
In Brussels, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen welcomed President Obama's announcement.
"I think it is a right decision for Afghanistan and for NATO. This is not a U.S. mission alone," he said. "There are 43 countries on the ground under NATO command and I am confident that other allies and partners will also make a substantial increase in their contributions."
The war in Afghanistan has come at a cost. More than 1,500 foreign troops have been killed in Afghanistan since the war started in 2001; more than 900 of them American.
While support for the troops generally remains4 high, opinion polls show support for the war does not, indicating uncertainty5 about the ability to succeed and get out have been voiced openly - and not just in Britain.
To many, President Obama's announcement that U.S. troops would begin coming home by mid6 2011 will be welcome. But, security analyst7 David Livingstone of London's Chatham House research center says hard deadlines can spell problems.
"It may well be that the Taliban will redouble their efforts to put political pressure by making that date unachievable and therefore create some instability in public perception of how this campaign is going to be fought in the longer term," said Livingstone.
Obama at West Point
President Obama made clear the United States cannot go it alone.
"Our friends have fought and bled and died alongside us in Afghanistan. Now, we must come together to end this war successfully," said Mr. Obama. "For what is at stake is not simply a test of NATO's credibility - what is at stake is the security of our Allies, and the common security of the world."
The NATO Secretary General says he is confident more troops will be sent. But European leaders have been reluctant to make firm new pledges. The issue is a top agenda item when alliance foreign ministers meet this week in Brussels.
Talks are to continue January 28 at a special summit on Afghanistan in London.
U.S. President Barack Obama has announced his new strategy for Afghanistan, which has military and civilian8 goals. Reaction from Kabul is mixed.
Sean Maroney | Kabul 02 December 2009
Watch: Maroney report on Afghan Reaction to Obama speech
Windows Media
Afghan Foreign Minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta (file photo)
"We have no interest in occupying your country," President Barack Obama said.
U.S. President Barack Obama has announced his new strategy for Afghanistan, which has military and civilian goals.
U.S. President Barack Obama spoke9 directly to the people of Afghanistan as he outlined his new strategy for their country.
"I want the Afghan people to understand - America seeks an end to this era of war and suffering," the president said. "We have no interest in occupying your country."
Following Mr. Obama's speech, Afghan Foreign Minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta spoke to reporters.
He says the Afghan government considers President Obama's announcement important for Afghanistan, the region overall and future U.S.-Afghan relations.
But while the Afghan government responded positively10 to Mr. Obama's plan, the reactions from ordinary Afghans in Kabul were mixed.
Sulaiman Khel is from Paktika province. He says his message to President Obama is very simple: Do not send more troops. He says Afghanistan needs financial support, not more foreign troops.
Mujeeb-u-Rahman is a student in Kabul. He says he believes that if there are more American troops in Afghanistan, security will improve.
Sayed Abdullah is an Afghan government employee in Kabul. He says Mr. Obama should just send the money instead of the troops. He says he believes the security situation will get worse if there are more foreign troops in Afghanistan.
Abdul Rauf Mangal is a businessman from Khost province. He says Mr. Obama's promise to strengthen the Afghan security forces is a good idea, and that Afghans will support him. He says just giving money to Afghanistan is not enough.
This has been the deadliest year for foreign troops in Afghanistan since the U.S.-led invasion toppled the Taliban government eight years ago.
Mr. Obama said late Tuesday the United States supports efforts by the Afghan government to reconcile with Taliban militants11 who lay down their weapons and reject violence. The U.S. president also said he hopes to start withdrawing American troops in July 2011.
People in Kabul embraced these concepts. They also approved of Mr. Obama's so-called "civilian surge," a U.S.-Afghan partnership12 that would help expand the country's agricultural sector13.
1 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 insurgency | |
n.起义;暴动;叛变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 mid | |
adj.中央的,中间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 positively | |
adv.明确地,断然,坚决地;实在,确实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 militants | |
激进分子,好斗分子( militant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|