-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
In Nepal, Maoists have intensified1 protests as a 6-month long standoff with the government shows no signs of ending. The political impasse2 threatens a historic peace pact3 which ended a violent Maoist-led insurgency4, and brought them into the political mainstream5 3 years ago.
Anjana Pasricha | New Delhi 21 December 2009
Photo: AP
Nepal's Maoist supporters march the streets the second day of three-day strike in Katmandu, 21 Dec 2009
"The end goal is, let the protests escalate6, frustrations7 of the public, let it boil over, and then they can swing into power through street protests or an urban uprising. That seems to be the plan at least as far as the hardcore is concerned." - Nepali Times Editor, Kunda Dixit
The three-day general strike called by Maoists this week was not what most people in Nepal had expected to witness at the start of the year.
At that time, Maoist leader Pushpa Kamal Dahal also known as Prachanda, headed a government which came to power after his party swept elections in 2008.
But hopes for peace received a serious jolt8 in May when Prachanda quit, and his party walked out of the government after the president overruled his bid to sack the army chief.
Since then the country has returned to a familiar pattern of strikes and protest rallies led by the former guerillas. Even more serious was a bid by Maoist activists9 to grab land in the countryside earlier this month leading to a clash in which four people were killed.
AP
Nepalese riot policemen stand guard on second day of three-day strike in Katmandu, 21 Dec. 2009
During the latest strike which began Sunday, the Maoists shut down the capital Kathmandu, blocked highways, damaged vehicles and clashed with police.
The editor of Nepali Times, Kunda Dixit, says the Maoists are using these tactics to get back into government.
"The end goal is, let the protests escalate, frustrations of the public, let it boil over, and then they can swing into power through street protests or an urban uprising. That seems to be the plan at least as far as the hardcore is concerned," said Dixit.
The governing coalition10 is blaming the Maoists for insincerity in implementing11 the peace deal, under which they abandoned their decade long guerrilla war, and entered mainstream politics.
However political analysts12 point out that the two major parties within the governing coalition - the Nepali Congress and the Communist UML party -- are equally to blame for refusing to negotiate with the Maoists. The Maoists want the President to apologize for refusing to obey their orders when they were in power -- a demand the government has refused to concede.
The head of Nepal's Center for Contemporary Studies, Lok Raj Baral, says the political parties are wary13 of the Maoists who emerged as the single largest party in the last election, and are not prepared to compromise with the Maoists.
"The other parties are very rigid14, and the Maoists after all they are pushed too far. They are scared of the Maoists, that is the main reason. It is not good for our peace process," Baral said.
The growing gulf15 between the main political parties and the Maoists has virtually brought the peace process to a standstill. In parliament the Maoists have led a protest campaign blocking most legislation. And while all political parties including the Maoists say they remain committed to writing a new constitution for the country, few expect it to be ready by its May 2010 deadline if the deadlock16 persists.
Central to the impasse between the two sides is also the issue of what will happen to about 20,000 former Maoist fighters who have been living in United Nations supervised camps since the insurgency ended three years ago. The army has so far refused to integrate them into its ranks as demanded by the Maoists, saying the fighters are politically indoctrinated.
Kunda Dixit says the growing influence of hardliners among the major political parties and the Maoists also poses a threat to the peace process.
"There is also a very dangerous right wing tendency, now within the two non-Maoist parties as well as parts of the army which think that the entire peace process was a mistake, we gave too much away to the Maoists and then on the Maoist side there is the whole radical17 wing, the commanders in the field who have been stewing18 in U-N supervised camps now for three years and they are getting impatient, both sides are under pressure from the hard core," said Dixit.
As the political bickering19 continues, there is growing disillusionment among ordinary Nepalese that the end of the country's civil war has not meant the return of peace to the country. And fears are growing that the country could even return to conflict if the impasse is not resolved soon.
1 intensified | |
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 impasse | |
n.僵局;死路 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pact | |
n.合同,条约,公约,协定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 insurgency | |
n.起义;暴动;叛变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 escalate | |
v.(使)逐步增长(或发展),(使)逐步升级 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 frustrations | |
挫折( frustration的名词复数 ); 失败; 挫败; 失意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 jolt | |
v.(使)摇动,(使)震动,(使)颠簸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 activists | |
n.(政治活动的)积极分子,活动家( activist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 implementing | |
v.实现( implement的现在分词 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 wary | |
adj.谨慎的,机警的,小心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 rigid | |
adj.严格的,死板的;刚硬的,僵硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 deadlock | |
n.僵局,僵持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 stewing | |
炖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 bickering | |
v.争吵( bicker的现在分词 );口角;(水等)作潺潺声;闪烁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|