-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Executives of major U.S. banks faced tough questions Wednesday from U.S. lawmakers frustrated1 by the slow pace of lending by institutions that received federal bail2 out money. Lawmakers also vented3 their anger over high salaries and bonuses in the financial industry, warning the executives they need to accept greater transparency and re-build public trust.
From (L), Bank of NY Mellon CEO Robert Kelly; Bank of America CEO Ken4 Lewis; State Street Corp. CEO Ronald Logue, 11 Feb 2009
Amid the distress5 of the U.S. recession, and public anger over how government support funds have been spent to prop6 up financial institutions, executives said they favor steps by Congress and the Obama administration to impose greater accountability.
"Taxpayers8 want to see how we are using this money to re-start the economy and want us to manage our expenses carefully. These expectations are appropriate and we are working to meet them," said Ken Lewis, CEO of Bank of America.
"The American people are right to expect that we use the TARP funds responsibly, quickly and transparently9 to help Americans," added Vikram Pandit of Citigroup.
Americans, added Pandit, also have a right to expect a return on their investments in the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.
That, and questions about how individual banks have or have not used funds to expand lending and help repair the crumbled10 credit market dominated the House Financial Services Committee hearing.
"Taxpayers have lent their money to the big banks who are supposed to be big business persons [with] expertise11 in business management, who are failing, they have gone back to ask for some assistance [and] they are being denied," said Democrat12 Maxine Waters.
The criticism was bipartisan, as lawmakers from both parties also highlighted the issue of bonuses paid by banks, and million-dollar salaries.
Rep. Barney Frank
"We believe success should be rewarded, but what gets people upset and rightfully so are executives being rewarded for failure especially when those rewards are being subsidized by the U.S. taxpayers," said Texas Republican Jeb Hensarling.
"Why do you need bonuses? Can't we just give you a good salary, or give yourselves a good salary [because] you're in charge of that, and do the job? This notion that you need some special incentive13 to do the right thing troubles people," said committee chair Barney Frank, Democrat from Massachusetts.
Executives said that while federal funds were used to improve their capital base, banks have done what they can to expand lending.
John Stumpf of Wells Fargo said his company made more than $500 billion in new loan commitments over the last 18 months.
"Last quarter alone we made $22 billion in new loan commitments, and $50 billion in new mortgages, a total of $72 billion in new loans," said Stumpf.
Public anger has been fueled by media reports that banks and institutions receiving public funds handed out more than $18 billion in bonuses and that some continued the practice of spending on employee retreats.
Democrat Paul Kanjorski warned that banks will be under ever-increasing scrutiny14.
"As executives at large companies, you once lived in a one-way mirror, unaccountable to the public at large, and often sheltered from shareholder's scrutiny. But when you took taxpayer7 money you moved into a fishbowl. Now everyone is rightly watching your every move from every side," he said.
James Dimon of JP Morgan Chase and John Mack of Morgan Stanley voiced support for plans by congressional Democrats15 for reforms, including a proposal to create a powerful new authority to regulate financial risk.
"In the short term this will allow us to begin to address some of the underlying16 weaknesses in our system, and fill the gaps in regulation that contributed to the current situation," Dimon said.
"We need to fundamentally improve systemic regulation. Our fragmented regulatory structure simply hasn't kept pace with the increasingly complex global market," added Mack.
Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs, agrees banks need to regain17 public trust.
"It is abundantly clear that we are here amidst broad public anger at our industry. Many people believe, and in many cases justifiably18 so, that Wall Street lost sight of its larger public obligations and allowed certain trends and practices to undermine the financial system's stability," he said.
Congressman19 Frank has said he would like to see substantial progress on financial system reforms in coming months.
1 frustrated | |
adj.挫败的,失意的,泄气的v.使不成功( frustrate的过去式和过去分词 );挫败;使受挫折;令人沮丧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bail | |
v.舀(水),保释;n.保证金,保释,保释人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 vented | |
表达,发泄(感情,尤指愤怒)( vent的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 ken | |
n.视野,知识领域 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 distress | |
n.苦恼,痛苦,不舒适;不幸;vt.使悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 prop | |
vt.支撑;n.支柱,支撑物;支持者,靠山 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 taxpayer | |
n.纳税人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 transparently | |
明亮地,显然地,易觉察地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 crumbled | |
(把…)弄碎, (使)碎成细屑( crumble的过去式和过去分词 ); 衰落; 坍塌; 损坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 expertise | |
n.专门知识(或技能等),专长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 democrat | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士;民主党党员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 incentive | |
n.刺激;动力;鼓励;诱因;动机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 scrutiny | |
n.详细检查,仔细观察 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 regain | |
vt.重新获得,收复,恢复 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 justifiably | |
adv.无可非议地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|