-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Twenty years have passed since the Soviet1 Union ended its disastrous2 military venture in Afghanistan. Some Soviet veterans were traumatized by the war and refuse to talk about it, others reflect on the experience and draw lessons they say apply to NATO forces that have been fighting Afghan rebels since 2001.
On February 15, 1989, Commanding General Boris Gromov was the last Soviet soldier to leave Afghanistan, walking across the Friendship Bridge that connected that war-torn country with what was then Soviet Uzbekistan.
Nearly 15,000 soldiers, advisors3, and other Soviet officials died during the war that Moscow launched in December 1979. Today, Gromov is convinced there are no military solutions to political problems in Afghanistan. He spoke4 at a recent Moscow news conference.
Gromov says force will accomplish nothing in Afghanistan, and notes that increasing or decreasing troop strength will only bring a negative result. The general says the best way to deal with Afghans is to reach an agreement with them.
Boris Gromov
General Gromov says the mission of Soviet forces in Afghanistan was never to achieve a military victory, but to help that country's pro-Soviet leaders fight drug trafficking and to defend Afghan pipelines5, roads and cities against terrorist attacks.
It is a justification6 rejected by the United States and much of the international community, which saw the invasion as aggressive attempt to expand Moscow's influence. And independent observers note the Afghanistan's drug trade did not affect the USSR, nor did the country have any pipelines that needed protection in 1979.
Anti-Soviet Afghan rebels, known as the Mujahedeen, received some of their weapons from the United States. The irony7 that some of those rebels joined the Taliban and now fight against U.S. forces is not lost on General Gromov, who especially condemns8 America's Stinger missile. The Mujahedeen used this shoulder-fired weapon to devastating9 effect against Soviet aviation.
Independent Russian military analyst10 Pavel Felgenhauer notes that unlike the Mujahedeen, the Taliban today are not supplied by any foreign government, which could have a bearing on NATO's chances to reach an agreement with their enemy.
Felgenhauer says the Mujahedeen fielded the fighters, but were backed by China, Saudi Arabia and primarily the United States, which supplied them with modern weapons. The Taliban, he says, are not supported by any major country, but rather by certain non-state elements in Pakistan and by al-Qaida.
He notes that General Gromov fought on a Cold War military front, which precluded11 victory or an agreement with his Afghan enemy. Felgenhauer says agreement is now possible, but warns it will not necessarily happen.
A complicating12 factor today, he says, is Afghanistan's burgeoning13 drug trade, which is funding the Taliban. This, he says, forces NATO to fight opium14 farmers and increases popular opposition15 to the alliance.
Dmitri Popov fought during the last two years of the Afghan War, beginning as a private and ending as a master sergeant16. Today, he heads an Afghan veterans group in Moscow. He says that despite excellent armaments and troop morale17, Soviet forces could not overcome the psychology18 of ordinary Afghans.
Popov says Afghans had a different mission - to defend their liberty against all others. The Afghans, he says, think, "We have lived here for ages; many have tried to conquer us, to impose their faith or culture on us - but we do not need that. We want to live the way we have lived. We want to plow19 with oxen. We do not need technology or tractors."
Dmitri Popov and General Gromov are skeptical20 of NATO success in that country. The general says it would be better if Russia, the United States and other countries cooperated on a peaceful solution to Afghanistan.
Gromov says good relations with Afghanistan should be developed by an entire coalition21 of countries, including the United States. He says that together, all sides can pursue relations in Afghanistan that would end military fighting and give the country a chance to develop.
But analyst Pavel Felgenhauer says Moscow's offer comes at a price.
Felgenhauer says Russia is prepared to help Americans, but only its own terms, in other words, the United States would need to recognize Moscow's sphere of influence in the post-Soviet region.
The analyst says this would include a Russian veto on Ukrainian and Georgian NATO membership, and would require Moscow's approval for developing Western military infrastructure22 in Romania and the Baltics or deploying23 a U.S. missile defense24 system in Central Europe.
U.S. Vice25 President Joe Biden told the Munich Security Conference on February 7th the United States would not recognize any Russian sphere of influence. At the same time, Biden noted26 that Russia warned long ago about the rising threat from the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan. He added that NATO and Russia can and should cooperate to defeat this common enemy.
Meanwhile, U.S. President Barack Obama says the United States will continue to work for a stable Afghanistan that is not a haven27 for terrorists. He plans to increase U.S. troop strength in Afghanistan and has ordered a strategic review to make sure American goals in that country are clear and achievable. Among those goals is a broader policy that does not focus solely28 on the military aspect.
1 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 disastrous | |
adj.灾难性的,造成灾害的;极坏的,很糟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 advisors | |
n.顾问,劝告者( advisor的名词复数 );(指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 pipelines | |
管道( pipeline的名词复数 ); 输油管道; 在考虑(或规划、准备) 中; 在酿中 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 justification | |
n.正当的理由;辩解的理由 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 irony | |
n.反语,冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事,嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 condemns | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的第三人称单数 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 precluded | |
v.阻止( preclude的过去式和过去分词 );排除;妨碍;使…行不通 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 complicating | |
使复杂化( complicate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 burgeoning | |
adj.迅速成长的,迅速发展的v.发芽,抽枝( burgeon的现在分词 );迅速发展;发(芽),抽(枝) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 opium | |
n.鸦片;adj.鸦片的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 sergeant | |
n.警官,中士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 morale | |
n.道德准则,士气,斗志 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 plow | |
n.犁,耕地,犁过的地;v.犁,费力地前进[英]plough | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 coalition | |
n.结合体,同盟,结合,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 deploying | |
(尤指军事行动)使展开( deploy的现在分词 ); 施展; 部署; 有效地利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 haven | |
n.安全的地方,避难所,庇护所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|