-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A U.S.-based human rights group has raised an uproar1 with a report arguing that development assistance to Ethiopia may be doing more harm than good by strengthening a repressive government. The report has sparked condemnation2 in some quarters, praise in others.
The Human Rights Watch report issued last month accuses Ethiopia's government of using development aid to suppress political dissent3. The 105-page document alleges4 that much of the $3 billion a year contributed by foreign donors6 is used to consolidate7 the power of the ruling Ethiopian Peoples' Revolutionary Democratic Front.
Ethiopian government spokesmen did not answer repeated phone calls seeking comment on the report. The government, however, launched a scathing8 counterattack online. Statements posted on the foreign ministry9 website accuse Human Rights Watch of "unbridled arrogance10" and "warped11 neo-colonialism."One statement calls the allegations a "make believe" story that is part of a "vendetta12" against the Ethiopian people. Another accuses the rights group of trying to bully13 the international aid community into halting cooperation with Addis Ababa.
A consortium of 25 aid donors, known as the Development Assistance Group, issued a statement saying it disagrees with the conclusions in the HRW report. The DAG, as the assistance group is known, said its own independent study earlier this year uncovered no evidence of widespread or systematic14 aid distortion.
The full DAG study posted on the group's website, though, paints a different picture. It states that its study was a "desk-top" exercise - not an investigation15 - and no specific allegations were checked. The study notes that a fact-finding mission late last year by the U.S. Agency for International Development observed the potential for political bias16 in the allocation of aid. It recommended further analysis to determine if systematic distortion takes place on the basis of political affiliation17.
The United States is Ethiopia's largest individual aid donor5, giving an estimated $1.3 billion per year. USAID Country Director Thomas Staal said the types of distortion alleged18 in the HRW report would be difficult for a donor study to detect.
"To us, the important thing is to make sure the programs are well managed, closely monitored with strict accountability systems, and you're building institutions that can make sure programs are meeting the goals, targets and beneficiaries intended," said Staal. "And you cannot go after individual cases of an allegation here and there."Authors of the Human Rights Watch report call the Development Assistance Group's response to their allegations "disingenuous19." In a telephone interview, HRW Horn of Africa Senior Researcher Leslie Lefkow said the aid community has been timid in confronting Ethiopia's government with charges of misusing20 aid money.
"This is one of the ironies21 of research we did, and the discussions we had with officials before we published this report, is that many of them privately22 acknowledge the characterization of the regime as repressive. They acknowledge these characteristics privately, but publicly there is no appetite for voicing this analysis."Ethiopian opposition23 leader Bulcha Demeksa is a former World Bank director and a long-time senior official of the United Nations Development agency. He said the ruling party's access to vast sums of cash during the last election should have been a red flag to donors that aid money was involved.
"I do not understand how they cannot see the huge amount of money that was spent in elections this year," said Demeksa. "Where does this money come from? Ethiopia, all by itself, cannot sustain that. I believe this money was from the various types of aid coming from donors."Demeksa said political payments were so widespread during the election that anyone not receiving money was socially ostracized24. "In my own district I know very well ... and there is no house this has not touched. People are now afraid if they think somebody has not received money, and is not a thorough EPRDF supporter, nobody goes to his house, he is not invited to weddings, social functions."Lefkow said the ruling party's influence has grown exponentially in recent years. "Between 2005 and 2010, the party increased its membership to between 4 million and 5 million, that is one in seven adults, which means in most families you have a party member, and in most kebeles (village districts) every household probably has a party member. So I do not think it is an exaggeration to say the party has essentially25 infiltrated26 every layer of Ethiopian society."Prime Minister Meles Zenawi rejects characterizations of Ethiopia as a "one party state." He describes it as a dominant27 party state.
In parliamentary elections this year, the EPRDF and its allies won 99.6 percent of the seats. In village and regional council elections two years ago, the party won all but three of nearly 3 million seats. Ethiopia remains28 one of the world's poorest countries, though official figures show the economy has grown 10 percent or more in each of the past seven years.
1 uproar | |
n.骚动,喧嚣,鼎沸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 condemnation | |
n.谴责; 定罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 dissent | |
n./v.不同意,持异议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 alleges | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 donor | |
n.捐献者;赠送人;(组织、器官等的)供体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 consolidate | |
v.使加固,使加强;(把...)联为一体,合并 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 scathing | |
adj.(言词、文章)严厉的,尖刻的;不留情的adv.严厉地,尖刻地v.伤害,损害(尤指使之枯萎)( scathe的现在分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 ministry | |
n.(政府的)部;牧师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 arrogance | |
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 warped | |
adj.反常的;乖戾的;(变)弯曲的;变形的v.弄弯,变歪( warp的过去式和过去分词 );使(行为等)不合情理,使乖戾, | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 vendetta | |
n.世仇,宿怨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 bully | |
n.恃强欺弱者,小流氓;vt.威胁,欺侮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 systematic | |
adj.有系统的,有计划的,有方法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 bias | |
n.偏见,偏心,偏袒;vt.使有偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 affiliation | |
n.联系,联合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 disingenuous | |
adj.不诚恳的,虚伪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 misusing | |
v.使用…不当( misuse的现在分词 );把…派作不正当的用途;虐待;滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 ironies | |
n.反语( irony的名词复数 );冷嘲;具有讽刺意味的事;嘲弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 privately | |
adv.以私人的身份,悄悄地,私下地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 ostracized | |
v.放逐( ostracize的过去式和过去分词 );流放;摈弃;排斥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 infiltrated | |
adj.[医]浸润的v.(使)渗透,(指思想)渗入人的心中( infiltrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 dominant | |
adj.支配的,统治的;占优势的;显性的;n.主因,要素,主要的人(或物);显性基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|