-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Top U.S. defense1 officials say the new strategy for the war in Afghanistan announced by President Barack Obama a year ago is working. Some military and intelligence analysts3, however, say the fight is far from over. The comments come as the White House prepares to deliver a widely anticipated year-end review of the administration's Afghan policy.
After more than nine years of war and the surge of 30,000 additional troops into Afghanistan, U.S. defense officials say progress is being made in the fight against the Taliban and al-Qaida.
Speaking recently in Kabul, U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said the new plan for Afghanistan is successful because Taliban insurgents4 control much less territory than they did one year ago. "I will go back convinced that our strategy is working and that we will be able to achieve the key goals laid out by President Obama last year."
Those goals include the handover of security responsibilities to Afghan forces and to have the Afghan government take the lead for the entire nation by the end of 2014. Obama's goals also include denying al-Qaida a safe haven5 and the Taliban the ability to overthrow6 the Afghan government.
Georgetown University Professor Bruce Hoffman said that while al-Qaida has been under immense pressure from a major increase in drone attacks in Pakistan's tribal7 areas along the Afghan border, the terrorist group continues to wage a war of attrition against Western nations.
"Their strategy is to wear us down and also to force us to spend more money on domestic security and to prolong our overseas military commitments to the greatest extent possible," said Hoffman.
The top NATO and U.S. Commander in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus, said allied8 and Afghan forces have seized momentum9 from the Taliban in many key regions, but some still are under the control of insurgents.
"Clearly, again, the Taliban does still have areas in which it has the freedom of movement, in some cases still has arguably the momentum, and so therefore there's more work to be done in those areas," said Petraeus.
Most of the military effort during the surge has focused on the provinces of Kandahar and Helmand in southern Afghanistan, traditionally the stronghold of the Taliban insurgency10.
While U.S. troops have made progress in pacifying11 that region, there are concerns the Taliban is increasing its presence in northern Afghanistan, in areas once considered secure.
Muhammad Tahir is an analyst2 from Radio Free Europe who has spent considerable time in Afghanistan. During a recent trip to northern Kunduz Province, Tahir said there was significant evidence of Taliban influence there.
"Security is very important. Something must be done with this. Because when you do not have enough security there, there are other guys to fill this security gap today. The other guys are the Taliban, the militants12, the foreign or the local. So they will fill that," said Tahir.
Amrullah Saleh is the former director of Afghanistan's National Directorate of Security. He said the key to defeating the Taliban is to cut off support in safe havens13 across the border in Pakistan. Saleh said while this year's surge in U.S. troops has secured some territory, it has failed to achieve the primary goals of the war.
"Has the surge brought a fundamental change in the basics? Has something changed in Pakistan? No. Have we captured, killed or brought into the negotiations14 table the Taliban leadership? No. Have we defeated al-Qaida? No," said Saleh.
The executive director of the Center for Research and Security Studies in Islamabad, Imtiaz Gul, said it will take more time to establish whether President Obama's strategy for the war in Afghanistan will work.
"On a tactical level there has been some success reported by General Petraeus and also by the Afghan government," said Gul. "But tactical victories or successes do not necessarily translate into durable15, peaceful solutions. So you really have to look at the impact a few further months down the lane to determine as to whether the surge has been successful or not."
The next major deadline in the war strategy is July 2011, when Obama has said he wants to begin a gradual drawdown of U.S. troops from Afghanistan.
1 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 insurgents | |
n.起义,暴动,造反( insurgent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 haven | |
n.安全的地方,避难所,庇护所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 overthrow | |
v.推翻,打倒,颠覆;n.推翻,瓦解,颠覆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 tribal | |
adj.部族的,种族的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 momentum | |
n.动力,冲力,势头;动量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 insurgency | |
n.起义;暴动;叛变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pacifying | |
使(某人)安静( pacify的现在分词 ); 息怒; 抚慰; 在(有战争的地区、国家等)实现和平 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 militants | |
激进分子,好斗分子( militant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 havens | |
n.港口,安全地方( haven的名词复数 )v.港口,安全地方( haven的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 durable | |
adj.持久的,耐久的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|