-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Radio telescopes are not enough, says SETI scientist
Art Chimes | Washington, DC 16 April 2010
When the search for extra-terrestrial life began a half-century ago, it was assumed that technological1 civilizations would broadcast more and more signals into space. But that assumption could be wrong.
Related Links
"The Eerie2 Silence" (publisher's website)
"After 50 years of silence ... I'm trying to urge the SETI community to change their tactics a bit." — Paul Davies
Fifty years ago this week, a young Cornell University scientist named Frank Drake pointed3 a radio telescope at a distant star, hoping to hear transmissions from an alien civilization.
After a half-century, the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence, or SETI, has pretty much come up empty. But a leader in the SETI community says maybe we're looking in the wrong way.
New approach
When the search began, a half-century ago, it seemed sensible to assume that as technological civilization increased on a planet, more and more signals would be broadcast into space. It was just a matter of knowing where and how to tune4 in.
Now, it seems sensible to assume that that assumption could be wrong. Television and radio transmitters on Earth may soon go dark, replaced by cable, fiber5, satellites, and the Internet.
'The Eerie Silence,' reviews the search for alien life and suggests ways to broaden the quest.
So Arizona State University physicist6 and astrobiologist Paul Davies says we might not be hearing alien civilizations because they have transcended7 their broadcasting stage. And, as for sending a message aimed at us, Davies says they probably don't even know we're here.
'10,000 communicating civilizations in the galaxy8'
"Even an optimist9 like Frank Drake estimates that there would be no more than about 10,000 communicating civilizations in the galaxy, which means that the nearest one is likely to be about 1,000 light years away," he said in a VOA interview.
"Now, if you're on a star about 1,000 light years away, you see earth as it was 1,000 years ago. There were no radio telescopes. There was no radio technology here. It would make no point in those aliens sending messages our way at this particular time."
Eerie silence
Davies is the author of a new book, "The Eerie Silence," which reviews the search for alien life and suggests ways to broaden the quest.
He's not against the radio telescope surveys that have been the mainstay of SETI for the past 50 years, but he says maybe we're looking for the wrong thing.
"We could look for beacons," he suggests. "It could be that there are alien civilizations that have simply created something a little bit like a lighthouse that sweeps the plane of the galaxy, goes bleep, and it's there to attract attention, or it's a monument, or an aesthetic10 symbol or even a religious symbol. Who knows? And that's a different type of search. I'm trying to urge the SETI community to change their tactics a bit."
Changing tactics
Or maybe, instead of a radio signal, an alien civilization sent us something physical. Science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke described an object left on the moon to let aliens know when humans were able to travel in space. Davies says maybe aliens have sent a probe to orbit the Sun.
A more intriguing11 possibility is that our genetic12 makeup13 includes a signal encoded by aliens in our DNA14 that might have been left hundreds of millions of years ago.
"We have genes15 inside our body that go back three billion years, largely unchanged. So if you can somehow upload a message into DNA of terrestrial organisms, it could last a very, very long time, indeed."
Paul Davies admits some of his ideas may be "fanciful."
"But they illustrate16 what I want to try to do in this book, which is to just broaden the thinking to get away from this traditional sort of radio search. That should carry on, of course. But in addition, we need some new thinking. After 50 years of silence, I think the time has come to take stock and say, maybe we should mobilize all of the sciences to look for anything fishy17, anything weird18, any anomaly, both in our own little corner of the universe here on Earth and in the solar system, and far out across the galaxy."
University of Arizona scientist Paul Davies' new book, "The Eerie Silence," advocates an expanded search for extra-terrestrial intelligence.
1 technological | |
adj.技术的;工艺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 eerie | |
adj.怪诞的;奇异的;可怕的;胆怯的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 tune | |
n.调子;和谐,协调;v.调音,调节,调整 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 fiber | |
n.纤维,纤维质 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 physicist | |
n.物理学家,研究物理学的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 transcended | |
超出或超越(经验、信念、描写能力等)的范围( transcend的过去式和过去分词 ); 优于或胜过… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 galaxy | |
n.星系;银河系;一群(杰出或著名的人物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 optimist | |
n.乐观的人,乐观主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 aesthetic | |
adj.美学的,审美的,有美感 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 intriguing | |
adj.有趣的;迷人的v.搞阴谋诡计(intrigue的现在分词);激起…的好奇心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 makeup | |
n.组织;性格;化装品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 DNA | |
(缩)deoxyribonucleic acid 脱氧核糖核酸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 genes | |
n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 fishy | |
adj. 值得怀疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 weird | |
adj.古怪的,离奇的;怪诞的,神秘而可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|