-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
PEPFAR Evolves and Expands
PEPFAR, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, is credited with saving millions of lives in developing countries. The program, which started under President Bush, continues under President Obama. However, despite the success, supporters say PEPFAR faces many challenges due to a poor economy and partisan1 politics.
U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator2 Eric Goosby, the man in charge of PEPFAR, said many people are responsible for the program’s success.
“The healthcare providers, faith-based organizations and community groups, the businesses, the people living with HIV – they are the hands and feet who have led the transformation3 over the past decade. It’s thanks to them that the PEPFAR program was able to make incredible progress in both a programmatic impact, but just as importantly, in returning and expanding hope to the communities in which we work,” he said.
Dr. Goosby said PEPFAR has taught the world much about tackling a global epidemic4. He says less than a decade ago the “hopelessness was overwhelming.”
“Despite the complexities5 of AIDS as a disease to diagnose and to treat, the United States took it on with a targeted approach on a large-scale and with accountability for results. Yet what even many experts don’t appreciate is the broader transformational impact of this work on the health sector6,” he said.
He said improving hospitals, clinics and labs, as well as training healthcare workers and creating better supply chains have also strengthened health care systems in developing countries.
“That helps us understand the improvements we’ve seen in non-HIV indicators7 such as maternal8, child and TB related mortality, use of ante-natal care and safe blood supply. I believe we just scratched the surface of what can be achieved on these platforms,” he said.
Ambassador Goosby said PEPFAR will continue to push for “country ownership” of HIV/AIDS programs. This gives local health officials greater authority in tailoring programs to their needs. It does not mean an end to PEPFAR funding at this time.
“These frameworks have also given us a forum9 in which to highlight policy or other issues that may be holding countries back, whether it’s failure to focus on key populations at highest risk, lack of inclusion of women, or not collaborating10 with the faith sector that does so much of the work. Of course another recurring11 barrier is an adequate investment in health from national budgets,” he said.
He added that “shared responsibility” is what will allow PEPFAR programs to expand.
PEPFAR works closely with the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis12 and Malaria13, and Goosby praises the fund’s efforts and reforms.
He said that an AIDS-free generation is not only possible, it’s something that must be achieved.
One of the major supporters of PEPFAR is Democratic Congressman14 Jim McDermott – a medical doctor and co-chair of the Congressional HIV/AIDS Caucus15. He is a former regional medical officer for the State Department in the then-Zaire.
“I arrived there in ’87 right in the middle of the beginning of the epidemic when Mama Yemo Hospital in Kinshasa had hundreds of people lying on the floor just dying,” he said.
He said in the early days of the epidemic, few members of congress were interested. He disagreed with former President Bush on many political issues, but says Mr. Bush “got it right” when he launched PEPFAR in 2003.
McDermott warns that today’s intensely partisan politics – coupled with a poor economy - have resulted in only short-term support for PEPFAR – funds just for fiscal16 year 2013.
“It isn’t very reassuring17. I get calls from my friends in South Africa and other countries saying, what’s going to happen? Are we going to have a program next year? Where’s it going to go? So the anxiety is flowing out all over the world as the Congress dawdles18 here on the Hill,” he said.
He warned PEPFAR is not immune from budget sequestration -- automatic, across-the-board cuts that take effect if the president and congress fail to agree on deficit19 reduction. McDermott said such cuts could result in a lot more AIDS-related deaths and many more orphans20.
Over the years, PEPFAR has spent tens of billions of dollars to fight HIV/AIDS.
1 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 coordinator | |
n.协调人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 epidemic | |
n.流行病;盛行;adj.流行性的,流传极广的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 complexities | |
复杂性(complexity的名词复数); 复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 indicators | |
(仪器上显示温度、压力、耗油量等的)指针( indicator的名词复数 ); 指示物; (车辆上的)转弯指示灯; 指示信号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 maternal | |
adj.母亲的,母亲般的,母系的,母方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 collaborating | |
合作( collaborate的现在分词 ); 勾结叛国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 recurring | |
adj.往复的,再次发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tuberculosis | |
n.结核病,肺结核 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 malaria | |
n.疟疾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 Congressman | |
n.(美)国会议员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 caucus | |
n.秘密会议;干部会议;v.(参加)干部开会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 reassuring | |
a.使人消除恐惧和疑虑的,使人放心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 dawdles | |
v.混(时间)( dawdle的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 orphans | |
孤儿( orphan的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|