-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Isolation1 rule changes are the latest case of the CDC's problems with messaging
The new CDC guidelines for COVID-19 isolation and quarantine have garnered3 a lot of criticism. And this is just one example of the agency's on going communication problems.
A MARTINEZ, HOST:
The new CDC guidelines for COVID isolation and quarantine have garnered a lot of criticism. Yesterday, they were panned by the American Medical Association as confusing and counterproductive. They've also been fodder4 for social media wags, who started a CDC has announced meme and also for comedians5. Here's Desi Lydic from "The Daily Show."
(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, "THE DAILY SHOW")
DESI LYDIC: If you test negative but you're an Aries or any other fire sign, test again. Your immune system is a free spirit, so the tests have trouble detecting COVID.
MARTINEZ: All right. So clearly, the message got muddled6. And that's just one example of the agency's communication problems. NPR's Selena Simmons-Duffin is here to explain. Selena, so obviously a lot of jokes and criticism on this latest guidance. How did things get so off track?
SELENA SIMMONS-DUFFIN, BYLINE7: Well, first of all, this came out via press release. It was only about 500 words. And it was unclear about how long to stay home and when to test, how to test, if you need to test. There was no technical briefing, no studies to support the change with evidence. That didn't come out until a week later. And there was none of the usual heads up that this press release was coming to important partners, like state and local health associations. Dr. Tom Frieden directed the agency during the Obama administration.
TOM FRIEDEN: There's a right way to do public health messaging. It means getting clear, simple, technically8 sound and practical recommendations, and then holding a media briefing to explain the reasoning behind them. For whatever reason, that's not how CDC recommendations are being rolled out.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: He says the result is that there's been a lot of misunderstanding about the guidance and criticism of the agency, and that some of the criticism points to a pattern with CDC's communication.
MARTINEZ: You said pattern. Tell us more about that.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Well, you know, there have been some memorable9 missteps, like take off your mask if you're vaccinated10 last spring, which then had to be walked back soon after. But also, critics say CDC is just not doing enough communicating about its guidance and policies to be able to explain when people are confused or have questions.
MARTINEZ: Now, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky has done media interviews. And she often presents at White House COVID-19 response briefings. Why wouldn't that be enough?
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Well, first of all, these are White House-led briefings. There hasn't been a CDC-led media briefing for two years. It's just not the same thing as subject matter experts, career scientists, sharing with the press and the public what they know. Dr. Walensky also is a political appointee who came from a big hospital system. Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is often also at these briefings, is famously a great communicator. But he is an immunologist, not a public health policy expert.
MARTINEZ: OK. So how should, then, the CDC be getting that message out there then?
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Well, in the not-too-distant past - back in 2009...
MARTINEZ: (Laughter).
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: ...Career scientists at CDC were briefing the public daily during the H1N1 pandemic. Glen Nowak ran CDC communications at the time. He's now a professor at the University of Georgia.
GLEN NOWAK: We did a press conference every single day for eight weeks, including weekends. We did press conferences as long as we had something that was new, something that was different, there was a need to do it.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: CDC scientists would field detailed11 questions from health reporters about the data or the vaccine12 supply or the guidance. And Dr. Frieden, who directed the agency then, says he actually thinks some of the current criticism of CDC is unfair, that the virus is changing in a way that justifies13 the changing guidance, but that the agency needs to get back to being more transparent14 and more communicative.
FRIEDEN: The fact is there are dedicated15 scientists at CDC who are the worlds' experts in a lot of these issues. And they need to be speaking directly to the public along with Dr. Walensky.
MARTINEZ: Selena, what does the agency say?
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Well, I asked CDC's press office if there might be CDC-led briefings in the future. I did not hear back by air time. And this isn't just about optics. People need to understand public health guidance to follow it. And unclear communication can be used to fuel disinformation that can undermine trust in CDC and public health. So the stakes are high.
MARTINEZ: Yeah. That's NPR's Selena Simmons-Duffin. Thanks a lot.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Thank you.
1 isolation | |
n.隔离,孤立,分解,分离 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 garnered | |
v.收集并(通常)贮藏(某物),取得,获得( garner的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fodder | |
n.草料;炮灰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 comedians | |
n.喜剧演员,丑角( comedian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 muddled | |
adj.混乱的;糊涂的;头脑昏昏然的v.弄乱,弄糟( muddle的过去式);使糊涂;对付,混日子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 technically | |
adv.专门地,技术上地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 memorable | |
adj.值得回忆的,难忘的,特别的,显著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 vaccinated | |
[医]已接种的,种痘的,接种过疫菌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 vaccine | |
n.牛痘苗,疫苗;adj.牛痘的,疫苗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 justifies | |
证明…有理( justify的第三人称单数 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 transparent | |
adj.明显的,无疑的;透明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 dedicated | |
adj.一心一意的;献身的;热诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|