-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
U.S. Senate is set to repeal1 the war authorization2 for the 2003 Iraq war
Twenty years after the Iraq War began, the Senate is on track to vote this week to repeal the authorization that justified4 the 2003 invasion.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Twenty years after the Iraq War began, the Senate is on track to vote this week to repeal the authorization that justified the 2003 invasion. Senate Democratic whip Dick Durbin argued in favor of the repeal on the Senate floor.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
DICK DURBIN: Let me be clear. Nothing we're doing here prevents an American president from acting5 in self-defense or in the face of imminent6 threats to our American nation.
MARTIN: Supporters say repealing7 the authorization will reassert the role of Congress in deciding when to start and end wars. NPR political correspondent Susan Davis has been covering the debate, and she's here with us now to tell us more. Good morning.
SUSAN DAVIS, BYLINE8: Good morning, Michel.
MARTIN: So U.S combat operations ended in Iraq in 2011, and yet it's been more than a decade and - before Congress has decided9 to take this step. What took so long?
DAVIS: Well, there really has been bipartisan support for this on Capitol Hill for years. In the Senate, it's been led by Democratic Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia and Republican Senator Todd Young of Indiana. And what Kaine said recently is there was really disinterest from - during the Obama administration and outright10 opposition11 from the Trump12 administration. But President Biden says he'll - he supports it, and he'll sign it if it reaches his desk. So there's a supermajority of support in the Senate. It's basically just taken this long for the political stars to align13 in its favor. The legislation also repeals14 the 1991 war authorization that justified the first Gulf15 War under former President George H.W. Bush.
Michel, these are largely symbolic16 votes, but supporters of the action say it really is about Congress reasserting this war power authority, which structurally17, over decades, has sort of crept towards the executive branch, particularly after the September 11, 2001, attack.
MARTIN: And, you know - and about that - I mean, after the 2001 attack, Congress passed another war authorization essentially18 to hunt down terrorists around the world. That's still on the books. And it's been used by four presidents now to conduct counterterrorism operations. Has Congress shown any interest in addressing that longstanding authority?
DAVIS: Yeah. I mean, in the Senate debate, they - it was brought up and it was rejected. Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky is a Republican. He offered an amendment19 that would have sunset that 2001 AUMF in six months. That would give Congress time to sort of revise it or rewrite it. That was overwhelmingly rejected. Just nine senators voted in favor of doing that. Republican Utah Senator Mike Lee offered another amendment that would require every AUMF to be reauthorized every two years at the start of every new Congress. Likewise rejected, only - like, handful of senators supported; 76 voted against that. What I think that says is there's actually very little interest in Congress in reining20 in not just the 2001 AUMF, but anything that would, you know, structurally make real-time decisions back in the hands of Congress. They're much more comfortable with these symbolic votes.
MARTIN: I'm wondering whether this Senate debate has demonstrated any reflection or regret about the impact that the Iraq war had on the country.
DAVIS: You know, the tone of it has largely been very forward-looking, sort of almost optimistic. Kaine and others now acknowledge - say Iraq is a strategic partner in the region, that they're not an adversary21 anymore. But Dick Durbin of Illinois, he was one of 22 Democrats22 who voted against it in 2002. And he spoke23 to those costs yesterday.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
DURBIN: No nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction were ever found. We were never greeted as liberators. Iraqi oil didn't pay for the damage, the $2 trillion cost of the war. American taxpayers24 paid for it. More than 4,500 U.S. service members died in the conflict in Iraq.
DAVIS: Michel, dozens of Republicans are expected to vote against the repeal today. Their opposition is less about the AUMF. They say it just sends the wrong message to the Middle East that it would seem that the U.S. is now disengaging from the region.
MARTIN: That is NPR political correspondent Susan Davis. Susan, thank you so much.
DAVIS: You're welcome.
1 repeal | |
n.废止,撤消;v.废止,撤消 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 imminent | |
adj.即将发生的,临近的,逼近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 repealing | |
撤销,废除( repeal的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 outright | |
adv.坦率地;彻底地;立即;adj.无疑的;彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 align | |
vt.使成一线,结盟,调节;vi.成一线,结盟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 repeals | |
撤销,废除( repeal的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 structurally | |
在结构上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 reining | |
勒缰绳使(马)停步( rein的现在分词 ); 驾驭; 严格控制; 加强管理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 adversary | |
adj.敌手,对手 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 democrats | |
n.民主主义者,民主人士( democrat的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|