搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
This is the VOA Special English Economics Report.
Last week, the United States Congress approved a major housing bill. President George Bush signed it into law on Wednesday.
The plan could help an estimated four hundred thousand homeowners late in their payments and in danger of losing their homes.
The government will guarantee up to three hundred billion dollars in lower-cost refinancing of loans. In return, lenders must agree to forgive part of the original loan.
Prices for homes, like this one in Denver, Colorado, are falling in many parts of the country
But experts say as many as three million owners are in trouble. With falling prices, many people owe more than their homes are worth.
The new law also includes help for the mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. They guarantee or own almost half of the nation's twelve trillion dollars in housing debt.
They buy high quality loans but have also invested in risky1 mortgages. In recent months they have reported eleven billion dollars in losses, and their stock prices have collapsed2.
Congress created the Federal National Mortgage Association, or Fannie Mae, in nineteen thirty-eight. In sixty-eight it became a shareholder-owned company financed with private capital. Then Congress created a competitor: the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Association, or Freddie Mac.
Fannie Mae and the smaller Freddie Mac buy loans from banks and other lenders, then sell them as securities to investors3 worldwide. This secondary market provides money for lenders to make new loans.
Now, few investors are interested in mortgage-backed securities without government guarantees.
Investors always believed that if Fannie and Freddie needed help, the government would intervene. Now, it has. The new law lets the Treasury4, until the end of next year, offer them unlimited5 credit and even buy their stock.
Some critics say Fannie and Freddie should be replaced by truly private companies. Their government connection has lowered their borrowing costs. But many economists6 say homeowners get little of that savings7. And critics have deplored8 their spending on political campaigns, lobbying activities, and pay for their executives.
The plan does create new supervision9 over both companies.
The Congressional Budget Office says the rescue plan could cost taxpayers10 twenty-five billion dollars. But it also says there is probably better than a fifty percent chance that no money will be needed.
And that's the VOA Special English Economics Report, written by Mario Ritter. I'm Steve Ember.
1 risky | |
adj.有风险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 collapsed | |
adj.倒塌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 investors | |
n.投资者,出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 deplored | |
v.悲叹,痛惜,强烈反对( deplore的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 supervision | |
n.监督,管理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。