(单词翻译:单击)
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning, everybody. I just had a meeting with Treasury1 Secretary Tim Geithner, Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, and governors like Ed Rendell, mayors like Antonio Villaraigosa, and economists2 and engineers from across the country to discuss one of America’s greatest challenges: our crumbling3(破碎的) infrastructure4 and the urgent need to put Americans back to work upgrading it for the 21st century.
We’re also joined today by two former Transportation Secretaries of both political parties: Sam Skinner, who served under President George H.W. Bush; and Norm Mineta, who served in the Cabinets of both President Clinton and President George W. Bush. They’re here today because they are passionate(热情的) about this task.
Their cooperation –- and indeed, this country’s very history –- proves that this is something for which there has traditionally been broad bipartisan(两党连立的) support. So Sam and Norm have been leading a bipartisan group of more than 80 experts who, just last week, released a call to action demanding a “fundamental overhaul” of how America approaches funding and building our infrastructure. And today, my Treasury Department and my Council of Economic Advisors5 have released our own study.
And these reports confirm what any American can already tell you: our infrastructure is woefully(悲伤地,不幸地) inefficient6 and it is outdated7. For years, we have deferred(推迟,延期) tough decisions, and today, our aging system of highways and byways, air routes and rail lines hinder(阻碍,打扰) our economic growth. Today, the average American household is forced to spend more on transportation each year than food. Our roads, clogged8 with traffic, cost us $80 billion a year in lost productivity and wasted fuel. Our airports, choked with passengers, cost nearly $10 billion a year in productivity losses from flight delays. And in some cases, our crumbling infrastructure costs American lives. It should not take another collapsing9 bridge or failing levee(堤坝) to shock us into action.
So we’re already paying for our failure to act. And what’s more, the longer our infrastructure erodes10(腐蚀,侵蚀) , the deeper our competitive edge erodes. Other nations understand this. They are going all-in. Today, as a percentage of GDP, we invest less than half of what Russia does in their infrastructure, less than one-third of what Western Europe does. Right now, China’s building hundreds of thousands of miles of new roads. Over the next 10 years, it plans to build dozens of new airports. Over the next 20, it could build as many as 170 new mass transit11 systems. Everywhere else, they’re thinking big. They’re creating jobs today, but they’re also playing to win tomorrow. So the bottom line is our shortsightedness has come due. We can no longer afford to sit still.
What we need is a smart system of infrastructure equal to the needs of the 21st century. A system that encourages sustainable communities with easier access to our jobs, to our schools, to our homes. A system that decreases travel time and increases mobility12. A system that cuts congestion(拥挤) and ups productivity. A system that reduces harmful emissions13 over time and creates jobs right now.
So we’ve already begun on this task. The Recovery Act included the most serious investment in our infrastructure since President Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System in the 1950s. And we’re not just talking new and restored roads and bridges and dams and levees, but we’re also talking a smart electric grid14 and the high-speed internet and rail lines required for America to compete in the 21st century economy. We’re talking about investments with impacts both immediate15 and lasting16.
Tens of thousands of projects employing hundreds of thousands of workers are already underway across America. We’re improving 40,000 miles of road, and rebuilding water and sewer17 systems(污水管道系统) . We’re implementing18 a smarter, more stable, more secure electric grid across 46 states that will increase access to renewable sources of energy and cut costs for customers. We’re moving forward with projects that connect communities across the country to broadband internet, and connect 31 states via a true high-speed rail network. And what’s more, a great many of these projects are coming in under budget.
1 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 crumbling | |
adj.摇摇欲坠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 advisors | |
n.顾问,劝告者( advisor的名词复数 );(指导大学新生学科问题等的)指导教授 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 inefficient | |
adj.效率低的,无效的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 outdated | |
adj.旧式的,落伍的,过时的;v.使过时 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 clogged | |
(使)阻碍( clog的过去式和过去分词 ); 淤滞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 collapsing | |
压扁[平],毁坏,断裂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 erodes | |
侵蚀,腐蚀( erode的第三人称单数 ); 逐渐毁坏,削弱,损害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 transit | |
n.经过,运输;vt.穿越,旋转;vi.越过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 mobility | |
n.可动性,变动性,情感不定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 grid | |
n.高压输电线路网;地图坐标方格;格栅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 lasting | |
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 sewer | |
n.排水沟,下水道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 implementing | |
v.实现( implement的现在分词 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|