搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
by Adam Freedman
Today’s topic: Halloween and the Law: tricks, treats--and due process.
And now, your daily dose of legalese: This article does not create an attorney-client relationship with any reader. In other words, although I am a lawyer, I’m not your lawyer. In fact, we barely know each other. If you need personalized legal advice, contact an attorney in your community.
The podcast edition of this article was sponsored by Go to Meeting. With this meeting service, you can hold your meetings over the Internet and give presentations, product demos and training sessions right from your PC. For a free, 45 day trial, visit GoToMeeting.com click the try it free button and enter the code podcast.
What are “Halloween Laws”?
Did you know that there are special laws that apply only on Halloween night? That may sound scary, but such laws are actually designed to make parents feel safer by restricting the activities of convicted sex offenders2 on Halloween. These laws are increasingly popular, but--as I’ll explain in a minute--they have been facing a number of legal challenges in state and federal courts.
Halloween Laws Apply to Sex Offenders
Over the past few years, a number of states--including Missouri, Illinois, Maryland, and Louisiana--have enacted3 so-called Halloween Laws. When I first heard the term “Halloween Law,” I thought that somebody had finally passed the kind of legislation I longed for as a kid: like, say, a law requiring grown-ups to hand out real candy on Halloween, rather than raisins4, apples, or other “healthy” snacks. But no, these laws have a much more serious purpose: to keep trick-or-treaters away from potential sexual predators5.
What Do Halloween Laws Say?
The typical Halloween Law requires convicted sex offenders to stay in their house on Halloween night, and prohibits them from answering the door to trick or treaters. In some states, sex offenders are also required to post a sign on their door saying “No Candy at this Residence,” or words to that effect. In Maryland, state officials created a stir when the signs that they distributed to sex offenders were pumpkin-shaped and bright orange. These unintentionally jaunty6 signs quickly became fodder7 for late-night comics, including a skit8 on Saturday Night Live.
Are Halloween Laws Unconstitutional?
But Halloween Laws have been subjected to more than just ridicule--they have faced a number of legal challenges. Although the basic requirements of typical Halloween Laws appear to be constitutional, some court cases in Missouri have placed limits on the scope of such laws.
First, Halloween Laws must be precise about what exactly they prohibit. In Missouri, the law not only required sex offenders to stay inside on Halloween, but it originally prohibited all “Halloween-related contact” with children. But the law never defined what “Halloween-related contact” means. For example, could a convicted sex offender1 carve pumpkins9 with his own children or grandchildren?
The law wasn’t clear. That’s a problem because the Constitution’s guarantee of “due process” means that penal10 laws must clearly describe the conduct that is prohibited. In 2008, a federal judge struck down Missouri’s ban on “Halloween-related contact” as unconstitutionally vague.
Halloween Laws May Not Apply to All Sex Offenders
The other aspects of Missouri’s Halloween Law remained in force. In January 2010, however, the Missouri Supreme11 Court held that the law applies only to individuals who were convicted of sexual offenses12 after the Halloween Law was enacted. The court said that subjecting sex offenders to additional obligations that didn’t exist at the time of their conviction would violate the Missouri constitution’s prohibition13 against “retrospective” laws.
But what about the US Constitution--you might be asking--doesn’t that prohibit all “ex post facto” laws? Yes, it does, but “ex post facto” is a relatively14 narrow concept; it doesn’t forbid all retroactive laws, but only those that criminalize conduct retroactively, or that add new punishments to past crimes. State laws that require convicted sex offenders to register with state authorities and follow certain guidelines have been upheld by the US Supreme Court on the theory that such laws do not impose additional “punishments” for past crimes. The bottom line is that the retroactive application of Halloween Laws will only be a problem in the relatively few states that, like Missouri, have broad prohibitions15 against retrospective laws. And even in those states, the Halloween Laws continue to operate with respect to those convicted after the enactment16 of the law.
Halloween Laws vs. the Right to Travel
Another objection to Missouri’s Halloween Law was raised last year by a man who was arrested for failing to stay in his house on Halloween night--even though the reason he wasn’t in his house was because he wasn’t even in the state. In fact, he was vacationing in Arkansas. But the Missouri law, like other Halloween Laws, does not have a specific exception for people who aren’t in their houses on Halloween because they’re travelling.
The lawyer for the man who was arrested last year argues that the strict requirement to stay in your house over Halloween infringes17 on Americans’ right to travel, which has been recognized as a “fundamental right” protected under the 14th Amendment18. Unfortunately, I can’t find any record of a court decision on that issue.
In any event, Halloween Laws that are written clearly and make some allowance for people to travel on Halloween should withstand constitutional challenge. And whether or not there is a Halloween Law where you live, there are plenty of other steps you can take to keep your kids safe on Halloween. Check out the article by my Quick and Dirty Tips colleague Mighty19 Mommy to learn more!
And finally, I wanted to let you know about a terrific new book by my Quick and Dirty Tips colleague Stever Robbins, aka The Get it Done Guy. Get-It-Done Guy's 9 Steps to Work Less and Do More covers all the big things that cause you to fall behind on your goals, like email overload20 and procrastination21. The book is available in paperback22 and as an ebook and audiobook. Enjoy!
Thank you for reading Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful23 Life. You can send questions and comments to................Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this article only.
1 offender | |
n.冒犯者,违反者,犯罪者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 offenders | |
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 enacted | |
制定(法律),通过(法案)( enact的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 raisins | |
n.葡萄干( raisin的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 predators | |
n.食肉动物( predator的名词复数 );奴役他人者(尤指在财务或性关系方面) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 jaunty | |
adj.愉快的,满足的;adv.心满意足地,洋洋得意地;n.心满意足;洋洋得意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 fodder | |
n.草料;炮灰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 skit | |
n.滑稽短剧;一群 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 pumpkins | |
n.南瓜( pumpkin的名词复数 );南瓜的果肉,南瓜囊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 penal | |
adj.刑罚的;刑法上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 offenses | |
n.进攻( offense的名词复数 );(球队的)前锋;进攻方法;攻势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 prohibition | |
n.禁止;禁令,禁律 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 prohibitions | |
禁令,禁律( prohibition的名词复数 ); 禁酒; 禁例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 enactment | |
n.演出,担任…角色;制订,通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 infringes | |
v.违反(规章等)( infringe的第三人称单数 );侵犯(某人的权利);侵害(某人的自由、权益等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 mighty | |
adj.强有力的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 overload | |
vt.使超载;n.超载 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 procrastination | |
n.拖延,耽搁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 paperback | |
n.平装本,简装本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。