专家细说海啸警报系统的重要性

（单词翻译）

专家细说海啸警报系统的重要性

MS. Pearson: My guest is Dr. Timothy Beach. He is Director of the Center for the Environment at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C.

Dr. Beach, some of the systems, or some of the reports indicate that it would cost about $20 million to put a warning system, a tsunami warning system, in the Indian Ocean. Twenty million hardly seems like a lot of money when we're hearing about all the money that it's going to cost to rebuild the seven countries involved that were affected² by the tsunami. What exactly is needed to be put in place?

Dr. Timothy Beach: What we need is a system of buoys⁴, both those that are on the ocean floor, pressure gauges⁶, as well as those tethered at the ocean surface. And then we need a system of satellites as well. We already have in place a system of satellites, the GOES system that the U.S. uses mainly for predicting weather from day to day, but it also allows for information on pressure in the ocean to be told to various warning organizations around the United States and around the coast of the United States, as well as the Pacific.

So the gauges themselves are on the order of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The GOES satellite system is a much more expensive one. But certainly we could build off the European system as well as off some of the other systems like our own GOES satellites. And so the total amount wouldn't be the total start up that it cost the United States and Europe for developing these kinds of weather prediction satellite systems.

MS. Pearson: And would you say that these also need to be put in other areas throughout the world? For instance, the Caribbean Basin doesn't have any kind of warning system.

Dr. Timothy Beach: Absolutely, especially the Atlantic as well, we know, for example, that on the Canary Islands there is a volcano that at a certain point in time? It may be a long time, it may not be so long will slip off into the ocean and induce a tsunami, which will affect Europe, and particularly England in this case. In fact, I was just reading an editorial in The Guardian⁷ of London, which was talking about this very point, which many geoscientists have talked about for many years.

MS. Pearson: Some experts have said that if the people in the countries that were affected by the tsunami had had even an hour to prepare for it, there would have been much less devastation⁸ in terms of loss of life.

Dr. Timothy Beach: Well, absolutely. An hour is enough time to get most people away from the main areas that are affected by a tsunami. The tsunami in this case, of several meters high, pushed inland a good distance because a number of these areas have low relief near the sea. But it's usually enough time to pull people out of the way, especially in areas that have higher relief that can move quickly up in elevation⁹.

So I think that... I'm sorry, what's the rest of...

MS. Pearson: We were talking about the amount of warning time needed.

Dr. Timothy Beach: The amount of warning time. An hour is not plenty, but it's more than you might have on smaller types of tsunamis¹⁰. We know, for example, there are local tsunamis that do occur from landslides¹² or from rock falls that may cause massive tsunamis in size and give only a few minutes, 10 to 15 minutes let's say, warning beforehand in which case a warning system is very difficult. But these are very infrequent.

There is a classic example of a 500 meter high tsunami in Alaska that devastated¹³ everything around it. Fortunately, the population was lower there. But for the most part, an hour is a good amount of time to move people away from beach areas.

Now, another aspect of this of course is to attempt to warn people around beach areas. And a classic example here is where we need more geographic¹⁴ and geoscience education. Another classic example of this was a little girl in England, who told her family, vacationing on the beach at Phuket in Thailand, that she had seen the ocean go out. And her geography teacher in England had told her that this is a prediction of a tsunami wave coming in. She told her parents. Her parents warned everybody on the beach. People pulled out, and nobody on that particular beach died.

So it underscores just the basic importance of geographic or geoscience education, which unfortunately we've cut over the last decades.

MS. Pearson: But people in especially the coastal¹⁵ areas need to have this very important information?

Dr. Timothy Beach: They need to have the information. We need the education. But we also need the kind of warning systems along the coast.

Another example of this is many people have argued that, well, in place there aren't the warning systems in many undeveloped countries that could warn a lot of people. But we know, for example, in Bangladesh, there is a system of warning by bikes and whistles, to warn people of cyclones¹⁷ and the rise in water that occurs with that, which has caused in the past the deaths of thousands and thousands of people.

So it could be very low-tech in the case of bicycles and whistles or it could be very high-tech¹⁸ in the case of geographic information systems, with satellite imagery and with overlays of data that tell us where areas are likely to be inundated¹⁹ by a particular size tsunami. And then also tell us where the major evacuation routes are.

And so we can go very high-tech, which I think we should do, because the total amount of money spent on that still doesn't add up to the total amount of costs that came from this earthquake, both in human life but also in infrastructure²⁰ and rebuilding.

MS. Pearson: But it can also be low-tech, like in Kenya, where there was one death, because...

Dr. Timothy Beach: Where there was one death, right.

MS. Pearson: Because the police or the military mobilized and got people off the beaches.

Dr. Timothy Beach: Any system that's appropriate for the country. It could be low-tech or high-tech in these cases. The U.S. system is a very high-tech one. But it also relies just on local people getting the word out around beach areas.

This is a classic example in this case where we have in the world a digital divide, as it's often called, between the developed countries that have a lot of computer technology and information, and undeveloped countries that have little of this. This so-called digital divide then divides us in many ways, access to information.

Now, this can work for us, where we don't have the digital divide, where people have access to information, from a warning system like this, but we could develop, again, the low-tech systems. Although it doesn't mean we shouldn't try to develop the high-tech systems for those undeveloped countries.

MS. Pearson: Thank you very much, Dr. Timothy Beach.

Dr. Timothy Beach: Thanks.

注释：

buoy³ [bCi] n. (湖, 河等中的)浮标，浮筒，救生圈

gauge⁵ [^edV] n. 标准尺，规格，量规，量表

tether [5teTE] v. 拴在

induce [in5dju:s] vt. 劝诱，促使，导致，引起，感应

geoscientist [7dVi(:)E5saiEntist] n. 地球学家

in terms of adv. 根据，按照

elevation [7eli5veiFEn] n. 上升，海拔，提高

landslide¹¹ [5lAndslaId] n. [地]山崩，崩塌的泥石

infrequent [in5fri:kwEnt] adj. 稀少的，很少发生的，罕见的

whistle [(h)wisl] n. 口哨，汽笛，哨声，汽笛声

cyclone¹⁶ [5saiklEun] n. 旋风，飓风，暴风，龙卷风

evacuation [i7vAkju5eiFEn] n. 撤退，走开

add up to v. 合计达