VOA慢速英语--美国将改革“大学记分卡”计分模式

（单词翻译）

US National Average Data Removed from ‘College Scorecard’

There are many things for students in the United States to consider when thinking about which college or university to attend. This includes the location of the school, whether it is in a big city or the countryside, the size of the student population, and even how well known the school is.

But as the cost of U.S. higher education keeps rising, another consideration for many students is return on investment.

Not all colleges and universities require a lot of money for a student’s education. But at some schools, students can expect to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars within the normal four-to-six year study period. If they have to spend that much, students want to know what they can expect to earn in their chosen career field.

In 2013, then-U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration launched an online tool to help students decide which college or university to attend. It is a Department of Education-operated website called College Scorecard.

The department created the website as a database for all kinds of information on schools across the country. It lists information on yearly costs, average student debt, completion rates and expected job earnings¹.

The Obama administration put all this data in one place as a way of providing answers to questions about higher education.

“We know students and families … often … feel they lack the tools to … decide which school is right for them,” noted² then-Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.

Critics raised questions about whether the data treated all schools fairly and whether it was helping³ some schools, but not others. Some were concerned that the website was designed only for students receiving financial aid from the federal government. And others argued that the data failed to demonstrate the student experience at some schools.

But generally speaking, College Scorecard has been a useful tool for Americans wanting to make informed decisions about higher education. So says Kaitlyn Vitez, higher education campaign director for the U.S. Public Interest Research Group. The group, also known as U.S. PIRG, is an alliance of activist⁴ non-profit organizations across the country and in Canada.

A major change to the 'College Scorecard'

Recently, the administration of President Donald Trump⁵ made a change to the College Scorecard that critics say limits its usefulness. In September, the Department of Education removed all the national median data from the website.

The national median data provided the national average for any of the qualities and groupings listed on the College Scorecard. For example, if users looked at the debt they could expect to take on from studying at a given school, they would also see the overall average for all the schools in the system.

This gave students at least some kind of general comparison when weighing costs and expected results, said U.S. PIRG’s Kaitlyn Vitez. She added that without this information, students might not be able to tell if a school is successfully serving students as well as others.

Vitez noted there are other ways for comparing the return on investment from colleges and universities. But some publications give more attention to schools that are well-known and respected, but not necessarily the best value.

Vitez said the current administration would want to limit this kind of information because of its support for for-profit higher education. The Obama administration took legal action against several for-profit schools, accusing them of wrongdoing.

Vitez said the current Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos, has taken steps to remove rules that she considers harmful to the for-profit higher education industry. This includes announcing plans to cancel a rule requiring schools to ensure that their graduates find good-paying jobs.

Vitez told VOA, “If we’re not going to be holding these schools accountable for … all those … really important metrics, and we’re also not going to … show that some of the schools are not a good choice for students, that doesn’t serve the public interest.”

But the Department of Education argues that the national median data has serious problems and is not that clear.

In a written statement, a department spokesperson noted that the national medians were established with data from every school receiving federal money. The official argued it is unfair to compare all schools with the same measures, as many colleges and universities are very different in important ways.

For example, a selective school that serves mostly wealthy students will have different outcomes than a school that mainly serves poor communities.

“Comparing these two types of institutions is meaningless,” the spokesperson wrote. “Institutional selectivity has a significant impact on institutional outcomes, and therefore the most appropriate comparisons are between institutions that serve similar students and have similar admissions criteria⁶.”

Who the remove of national medians affects

However, even some supporters of Secretary DeVos and her efforts find the change in the College Scorecard troubling.

Daniel Elkins is the legislative⁷ director for the Enlisted⁸ Association of the National Guard of the United States. His organization represents the interests of thousands of members of the U.S. armed forces.

Elkins says his group was pleased with recent actions by DeVos, including the plan to remove the employment guarantee rule. He argues it does not correctly punish all the schools guilty of underserving their students. However, he said, the removal of national median data is a move in the complete opposite direction from where the department should be heading.

Elkins notes that many armed forces members who seek a college or university education are non-traditional students. This means they are likely the first in their families to go college and may have little money of their own. He noted that their families may not be able to help them financially or have experience with higher education.

The U.S. military offers financial aid for education to some of its members. But many of them often need to take out loans to help pay for college. Elkins and Vitez agree any lack of knowledge can lead them to borrowing from bad lenders or attending bad schools. And the special tools the military uses to help members find good schools depend on information from College Scorecard, including national medians.

“If you do not have anything to compare it to, you don’t understand … what’s out there,” said Elkins. “Then you have to compare multiple graphs, multiple charts, and try and figure out an average on your own.”

In October, Elkins’ organization released a joint⁹ statement with several other military veterans groups. They asked the Department of Education to return national medians to the College Scorecard by mid-November. The information has yet to return to the website.

I’m Pete Musto. And I’m Dorothy Gundy.

Words in This Story

graduate(s) – n. a person who has earned a degree or diploma from a school, college, or university

accountable – adj. required to be responsible for something

metric(s) – n. a system or standard of measurement

selective – adj. careful to choose only the best people or things

institution(s) – n. an established organization

impact – n. a powerful or major influence or effect

appropriate – adj. right or suited for some purpose or situation

criteria – n. something that is used as a reason for making a judgment¹⁰ or decision

graph(s) – n. a drawing that uses a series of dots or lines to show how much or how quickly something changes

chart(s) – n. information in the form of a table or diagram