搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
Scientists Study Long-lasting Ancient Structures
Ancient builders across the world created structures that are still standing1 today, thousands of years later.
Roman engineers built thick concrete sea barriers, for example. Mayan builders created sculptures to their gods, and Chinese builders raised walls against invaders2.
But there are many recent structures that are already starting to fail. The concrete that makes up much of our modern world lasts around 50 to 100 years.
A growing number of scientists have been studying materials from long-ago. They are breaking apart pieces of buildings and reading historical texts hoping to learn how they have stood for thousands of years.
The research has turned up a surprising list of materials that were mixed into old buildings. They include tree bark, volcanic3 ash, rice, beer and even urine. These unexpected materials could have the ability to get stronger over time and "heal" cracks when they form.
Figuring out how to copy these features could have real impacts today. While our modern concrete has the strength to hold up very tall buildings and heavy infrastructure4, it cannot compete with the endurance of these ancient materials.
With the rising threats of climate change, there is a growing call to make construction more sustainable. A recent UN report estimates that the built environment is responsible for more than a third of carbon dioxide emissions5 worldwide. Cement production alone makes up more than 7 percent of those emissions.
Is ancient Roman concrete better?
Many researchers have turned to the Romans. Starting around 200 BCE, the Roman Empire was building concrete structures that have stood the test of time. That includes the Pantheon to the aqueducts that still carry water today.
Even in places where seawater has been hitting structures for ages, you will find concrete "basically the way it was when it was poured 2,000 years ago," said John Oleson. He is an archaeologist at the University of Victoria in Canada.
Most modern concrete starts with Portland cement, a powder made by heating limestone6 and clay to super-high temperatures and grinding them up. That cement is mixed with water to create a paste. Then, materials like rock and gravel7 are added.
Records from ancient builders show the Roman process was similar. The ancient builders mixed materials like burnt limestone and volcanic sand with water and gravel, creating chemical reactions to tie everything together.
Now, scientists think they have found an important reason why some Roman concrete has held up structures for thousands of years. The ancient material has an unusual power to repair itself. Exactly how is not yet clear, but scientists are starting to find reasons why.
Admir Masic is a civil and environmental engineer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In a study, he said this power comes from chunks9 of limestone throughout the Roman material that is not mixed in evenly. Researchers used to think these chunks were a sign that the Romans were not mixing up their materials well enough.
Instead, the scientists found that the chunks could fuel the material's "self-healing" abilities. When cracks form, water enters the concrete, Masic explained. That water activates10 the leftover11 lime, creating new chemical reactions that can fill in the damaged sections.
Ancient Roman ... skyscrapers13?
Today's builders cannot just copy the ancient processes. Even though Roman concrete lasted a long time, it could not hold up heavy buildings. "You couldn't build a modern skyscraper12 with Roman concrete," Oleson said. "It would collapse14 when you got to the third story."
Instead, researchers are trying to take some of the ancient materials and add them into modern mixes. Masic is part of a company that is trying to build new projects using "self-healing" concrete.
People do not need to make things last quite as long as the Romans did to have an impact, Masic said. If we add 50 or 100 years to concrete's lifespan, he said, "we will require less demolition15, less maintenance and less material in the long run."
Words in This Story
concrete — n. a hard, strong material that is used for building and made by mixing cement, sand, and broken rocks with water
infrastructure — n. the basic equipment and structures that are needed for a country, region, or organization to function properly
endurance — n. the ability to do something difficult for a long time
sustainable — adj. able to be used without being completely used up or destroyed
emissions — n. the act of producing or sending out something from a source
aqueduct — n. a structure that looks like a bridge and that is used to carry water over a valley
paste — n. a soft, wet mixture of usually a powder and a liquid
chunk8 — n. a thick piece of something
demolition — n. deliberate destruction of a building or other structure
1 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 invaders | |
入侵者,侵略者,侵入物( invader的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 volcanic | |
adj.火山的;象火山的;由火山引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 emissions | |
排放物( emission的名词复数 ); 散发物(尤指气体) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 limestone | |
n.石灰石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 gravel | |
n.砂跞;砂砾层;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 chunk | |
n.厚片,大块,相当大的部分(数量) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 chunks | |
厚厚的一块( chunk的名词复数 ); (某物)相当大的数量或部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 activates | |
使活动,起动,触发( activate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 leftover | |
n.剩货,残留物,剩饭;adj.残余的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 skyscraper | |
n.摩天大楼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 skyscrapers | |
n.摩天大楼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 demolition | |
n.破坏,毁坏,毁坏之遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。