搜索关注在线英语听力室公众号:tingroom,领取免费英语资料大礼包。
(单词翻译)
Former International Monetary1 Fund chief economist2 Simon Johnson said Wednesday that the biggest U.S. banks are too powerful and exert too much influence over the government.
Johnson told an audience at Washington's School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) that the biggest American banks bear considerable blame for the on-going financial crisis in the United States and subsequent global recession. Saying they comprise a financial oligarchy3, Johnson said the biggest banks should to be broken up into smaller parts.
He predicted that some major U.S. or European banks will fail. But he opposes nationalization, saying governments make bad managers and would impose a political agenda on the banks.
Now a professor at the business school at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Johnson voiced a similar view in responding to a caller on America's C-SPAN television last week.
"Why are your taxes going to go up? Why is the government having to take these measures [in rescuing the banks]? Because of the mistakes made by big business, these huge, huge mistakes [in taking too much risk]. Because they became far too big and powerful. And now they're trying to stick the rest of us [taxpayers] with the bill," he said.
Johnson said the financial services industry exerts its political power by contributing huge amounts of money to the electoral campaigns of members of the U.S. Congress. He said world economies are currently so weak that despite massive monetary and fiscal4 stimulus5, recovery is likely to be sluggish6 and slow to begin.
Another economist, Financial Times financial commentator7 Martin Wolf made a similar assesment about the power of the big banks. He told a Washington audience last week that the bailout of the banks is imposing8 intolerable costs on U.S. and European governments.
"We can't go on living like this. It's intolerable. And that is really the background, I think, that we have to approach thinking about the future of the financial system. We shouldn't allow one sector9 of the economy [the banks] to inflict10 fiscal costs on economies that are comparable, of course not in terms of destruction, but in economic costs, are like having a significant war," he said.
The International Monetary Fund says the financial losses directly related to the banking11 crisis are likely to approach $4 trillion.
The global crisis began in August 2007 with a credit squeeze associated with losses in the sub-prime U.S. mortgage market.
1 monetary | |
adj.货币的,钱的;通货的;金融的;财政的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 oligarchy | |
n.寡头政治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 stimulus | |
n.刺激,刺激物,促进因素,引起兴奋的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sluggish | |
adj.懒惰的,迟钝的,无精打采的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 commentator | |
n.注释者,解说者;实况广播评论员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 sector | |
n.部门,部分;防御地段,防区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 inflict | |
vt.(on)把…强加给,使遭受,使承担 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 banking | |
n.银行业,银行学,金融业 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎 点击提交 分享给大家。