-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
North Korea Missile Threat Brings Back Talk of 'Star Wars' Defenses
Scientists and American space agency officials led efforts by the United States to develop a space-based missile defense1 system in the 1980s.
Now, those same individuals are urging the U.S. government to re-start work on the anti-missile program. They say it could help answer nuclear threats from North Korea and other rogue2 countries.
North Korea’s nuclear activities have become a security concern to the government since the North began testing intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
There were false reports of a North Korean missile attack on Hawaii earlier this month. North Korea says its missiles have the ability to reach the U.S. mainland.
The U.S. Space Defense Initiative (SDI) was started over 30 years ago during the presidency3 of Ronald Reagan. SDI was called “Star Wars” by critics in the U.S. Congress and media. They questioned its high cost.
Many people also questioned its effectiveness against the Soviet4 Union’s large number of highly-developed nuclear weapons.
The program never got past the planning stage and was largely ended after the collapse5 of the Soviet Union.
“Everybody lost interest in SDI when the Soviet Union collapsed,” says Robert Scheder, who works for the RAND Corporation.
Scheder designed the first model for a space-based defense. He said that the nuclear threat from North Korea, and improvements in technology over the past 30 years, show the need for SDI.
In the 1980s, Scheder carried out experiments with a weapon system made of orbiting rockets. They had sensor6 technology that could stop attacking missiles immediately after launch, before they can release decoys and countermeasures.
But there were major technological7 problems.
The satellite interceptor systems, also known as Brilliant Pebbles8 or Smart Rocks, could not entirely9 contain a Russian attack involving thousands of nuclear missiles, Scheder said.
But he now believes they could provide fail-safe protection against the threat now posed by North Korea, which can only launch at most three or four missiles at a time. Scheder spoke10 to VOA from his home in Spain.
Thomas Roberts, a critic of space-based defense, works at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C. He says that even a few missiles could get through the defense system.
“The enemy can first launch a decoy,” Roberts said, which would make a hole in the system that other missiles could pass through.
At least 1,600 “killer” satellites would be needed to fully11 cover the Earth. The estimated $100 billion cost for placing thousands of Brilliant Pebbles in orbit would have used up all of the money the U.S. spent on defense in the 1980s.
The money could be spent just as effectively in deploying12 more traditional interceptor missiles and launching more satellites to watch and identify incoming enemy missiles, Scheder said.
“The much smaller size of satellites...would limit the cost,” he noted13.
Commercially available space technology that is produced by Tesla and other businesses would also lower costs and shorten deployment14 time. That’s the belief of experts with NASA, the National Aeronautics15 and Space Administration.
A former SDI director, retired16 U.S. Air Force General James Abrahamson, has placed the cost of Brilliant Pebbles at $20 billion.
Roberts said it would cost at least $70 billion.
Government support for SDI research was stopped when Bill Clinton was U.S. president. Plans to restart it under President George W. Bush were suspended because of anti-terrorism efforts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Growing concern with North Korea has moved the U.S. Congress to request new money for space weapons research. The House of Representatives’ Armed Services Committee made the request in a recent letter to President Donald Trump17 and his administration.
President Trump signed the 2018 National Defense Authorization18 Act last month. The act orders the Missile Defense Agency to begin research on SDI and other technologies.
Abrahamson has said that the land-based anti-ballistic missile Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system, or THAAD, cannot guarantee protection against an attack.
Experiments have shown that THAAD and the Navy’s AEGIS19 system have a 50 percent chance of stopping ICBMs when they re-enter the atmosphere.
They are “weapons designed to protect points in a set piece battle scenario,” Scheder said. But effective protection for whole countries or areas under threat by countries like North Korea can only be provided by satellite-operated area defense, he added.
Critics of space-based weapons point to the possibility that a satellite could make a mistake when trying to identify a hostile launch.
Defensive20 missiles could also be destroyed as they re-enter the atmosphere before hitting an enemy missile.
Scheder also says that the Smart Rock is a solid missile built to destroy a rocket without an explosion. As a result, its collateral21 damage would be limited.
An enemy ICBM has about 20 minutes in space when it could be hit, but “once it’s re-entered the atmosphere, land-based missiles have only seconds in which to hit it,” Scheder said.
Some weapon systems considered for SDI, like lasers, could not provide enough protection, he added.
There is also the theoretical danger that a rogue nation or group with highly developed cyber war ability could attack the system and use it against the United States or its allies.
But difficulties in overpowering a U.S. anti-missile system could persuade enemy nations that nuclear war is futile22, said Scheder.
He noted that the cost of the 1980s “Star Wars” program caused the Soviet Union to end its arms race.
I'm Susan Shand. And I'm Lucija Milonig.
Words in This Story
rogue – n. someone or something that causes trouble
stage – n. a point or period in the development of something
decoy – n. someone or something that gets people’s attention so they will ignore someone or something else
interceptor - n. something that stops an object mid-flight
pose – v. to cause; to set or put in place
fail-safe – adj. causing a piece of machinery23 to return to a safe condition in the event of a breakdown24 or problem
anti-ballistic – adj. of or relating to stopping missiles while in flight
commercial – adj. related to the buying and selling of services
collateral – adj. related but not in a direct or close way
cyber – adj. of or related to computers or computer networks
1 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 rogue | |
n.流氓;v.游手好闲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 presidency | |
n.总统(校长,总经理)的职位(任期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 collapse | |
vi.累倒;昏倒;倒塌;塌陷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sensor | |
n.传感器,探测设备,感觉器(官) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 technological | |
adj.技术的;工艺的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pebbles | |
[复数]鹅卵石; 沙砾; 卵石,小圆石( pebble的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 deploying | |
(尤指军事行动)使展开( deploy的现在分词 ); 施展; 部署; 有效地利用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 deployment | |
n. 部署,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 aeronautics | |
n.航空术,航空学 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 aegis | |
n.盾;保护,庇护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 defensive | |
adj.防御的;防卫的;防守的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 collateral | |
adj.平行的;旁系的;n.担保品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 futile | |
adj.无效的,无用的,无希望的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 breakdown | |
n.垮,衰竭;损坏,故障,倒塌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|