-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
UN Report on Syria Leaves Little Doubt about Chemical Weapons 联合国报告表明叙利亚化武使用确定无疑
There is a growing consensus1 that details contained in a U.N. report of last month’s chemical attack in Syria leave little doubt as to who was responsible. Military analysts3 say the direction from which the rockets were fired and other factors point squarely to the Assad government even as Syria's allies continue to offer a different narrative4.
Around the Syrian capital, the skyline is punctuated5 by pillars of dark smoke. Neighborhoods hit by chemical weapons look like ghost towns.
A contrast to the panic and suffering of a month ago.
Now, after U.N. inspectors6 released their report, experts like Salman Shaikh from The Brookings Doha Center say there can be no doubt as to what happened.
“I don’t think we should labor7 this point today in terms of who did it. It’s quite clear that the regime did it,“ Shaikh said.
To back up the claim, analysts point to the work of the U.N. inspectors, who pored over the evidence and made detailed8 notes on how and where the rockets landed.
Based on that, analysts at Human Rights Watch mapped the paths of two rockets from their point of impact to a likely point of origin, a Syrian military base.
Other military analysts point out the rebels simply don't have access to the types of surface-to-surface rockets used in the August 21 attack.
But in Moscow Tuesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov insisted questions remain.
"We want the events of the 21st of August to be impartially9, objectively, professionally investigated," he said. "We have serious grounds to believe that it was a provocation10."
Such doubts give hope to supporters of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, being forced only to hand over his chemical weapons to international control and nothing more.
“It clearly is so far demonstrating that you can use these weapons and there is relatively11 little accountability," said Brookings analyst2 Shaikh.
Many analysts fear that message will only set the stage for more intense fighting and more Syrian skylines sullied by smoke.
1 consensus | |
n.(意见等的)一致,一致同意,共识 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 analyst | |
n.分析家,化验员;心理分析学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 analysts | |
分析家,化验员( analyst的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 punctuated | |
v.(在文字中)加标点符号,加标点( punctuate的过去式和过去分词 );不时打断某事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 inspectors | |
n.检查员( inspector的名词复数 );(英国公共汽车或火车上的)查票员;(警察)巡官;检阅官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 impartially | |
adv.公平地,无私地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 provocation | |
n.激怒,刺激,挑拨,挑衅的事物,激怒的原因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|