-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Brookings Study Weighs Benefits of US - Africa Trade Reforms 布鲁金斯研究美非贸易改革的重大利益
WASHINGTON, DC — Can the United States take a trade law that’s helping1 to increase African exports, and make it better? That’s what African and American politicians, economists2 and policy makers3 are discussing as they consider the future of the African Growth and Opportunity Act, or AGOA.
The legislation, which expires in two years, drops duties and tariffs4 on thousands of products from the continent. Supporters say it’s generated hundreds of billions of dollars in trade and investment opportunities.
Most African development specialists and policy makers would like to see AGOA extended, at least for another ten years. Some would like to add other low income countries outside Africa or include a wider range of products.
A new study by the Washington-based Brookings Institution looks at how changes to the law might affect US trade with Africa.
According to the report, failing to extend AGOA would be among the worst options.
华盛顿特区——美国可以采取贸易法律来帮助提高非洲出口使它更好吗?这就是非洲和美国的政治家、经济学家和政策制定者正在讨论的他们考虑未来的《非洲增长与机遇法案》,或者《非洲增长与机会法》。
Curtailing5 wealth creation
The Brookings study says it would lead to a two percent drop in Africa exports to the United States, or about one billion dollars.
African sectors6 affected7 by the end of AGOA -- and the return of tariffs -- would include meat and dairy, leather, textiles and manufactured goods. Limited gains made in economic diversification8 would disappear in many AGOA-eligible countries, as would associated employment gains. The act has been credited with creating over 300,000 jobs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Many of those would be put at risk.
Wages for unskilled agriculture labor9 would be harmed particularly in South Africa and members of the Southern African Customs Union, Nigeria, and East Africa. Pay for skilled laborers10 in the textile and apparel industry would drop in Mauritius and Malawi.
The advantages of extension
On the other hand, renewing AGOA would continue to improve African trade and revenues. Dropping all US quotas11 and duties on goods on AGOA-eligible countries would provide Africa with even greater gains.
Mwangi S. Kimenyi, a senior fellow and director of the Africa Growth Initiative at the Brookings Institution in Washington,DC., says Africa would benefit from increased trade with the US.
"There’d be a big change in total value of trade between US and Africa….and because Africa is a small global market player, the cost to the US for allowing these products to come into the US are extremely small, with no major [effects] on the US economy…”
In fact, he says opening the US market to these sectors would cost the US less than $10 million dollars per year, but increase African exports by $72 million dollars.
In another proposed trade reform, some want to drop the 14 middle-income countries that are part of AGOA today. The Brookings study shows that under this plan, several countries would see large drops in exports to the US.
Nigeria would lose $500 million per year from mining and energy, agriculture and food. Mauritius would lose about $95 million dollars, with a majority from textiles. South Africa alone would lose nearly $260 million dollars in exports (including meat and milk products), while the rest of the Southern African Customs Union would lose about $110 million.
Out of Africa
US lawmakers are also considering an extension of AGOA-like preferences beyond Africa to other lesser12 developed regions of the world .
The report finds that doing so could harm African countries already enjoying AGOA-provided access to US markets.
"What about if you give the same [duty and quota-free] preferences to low income developing countries …. like Bangladesh and Cambodia," he asks. "Particularly in the area of textiles.. we find that African economies would not be able to sell much to the US..In fact, there would be big losses to African countries."
Economic Partnership13 Agreements
The study also considers the effect of other trade pacts14, including Economic Partnership Agreements, or EPA’s, between the European Union and the developing world.
They would create a free trade area with reciprocal preferential trade agreements between the EU and countries that would belong to five EPA-created regions: West Africa, Central Africa, East and Southern Africa, the Southern African Development Community and the East Africa Community.
Kimenyi says the report is not in favor of the agreements.
"Our model shows that….a lot of Africans would lose from EPA’s and if the US followed the same [idea], using EPA’s….it would be bad for Africa," he said..
The report says EPA’s encourage commerce within designated regions, but not between African countries belonging to different regional blocs15. For example, some countries bordering each other, like Mozambique and Malawi, would belong to different EPA groupings, and would each maintain high tariffs on each other.
Free trade areas
But the report does cite another tool for boosting African exports: free trade areas, or FTA’s.
For example, it found that an FTA between the US and EU would increase world trade by up to $124 billion dollars. It says Africa could benefit from such a deal if it implements16 regional trade agreements, preferably a continent-wide free trade area, or CFTA.
The report says $36 billion dollars per year in new trade would be created by dropping all quotas and tariffs between and among all countries on continent.
The resulting increase in exports could work to help offset17 the large loss of revenues from dropping duties and tariffs.
The question now, say Africa watchers, is if there’s political will to enact18 the economic reforms.
1 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 makers | |
n.制造者,制造商(maker的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 tariffs | |
关税制度; 关税( tariff的名词复数 ); 关税表; (旅馆或饭店等的)收费表; 量刑标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 curtailing | |
v.截断,缩短( curtail的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sectors | |
n.部门( sector的名词复数 );领域;防御地区;扇形 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 diversification | |
n.变化,多样化;多种经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 laborers | |
n.体力劳动者,工人( laborer的名词复数 );(熟练工人的)辅助工 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 quotas | |
(正式限定的)定量( quota的名词复数 ); 定额; 指标; 摊派 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 lesser | |
adj.次要的,较小的;adv.较小地,较少地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 pacts | |
条约( pact的名词复数 ); 协定; 公约 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 blocs | |
n.集团,联盟( bloc的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 implements | |
n.工具( implement的名词复数 );家具;手段;[法律]履行(契约等)v.实现( implement的第三人称单数 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 offset | |
n.分支,补偿;v.抵消,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 enact | |
vt.制定(法律);上演,扮演 | |
参考例句: |
|
|