-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Myanmar court again finds Aung San Suu Kyi guilty of corruption1
NPR's A Martinez talks to Derek Mitchell, a former U.S. ambassador to Myanmar and president of the National Democratic Institute, about Myanmar court finding Aung San Suu Kyi guilty of corruption.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
A court in military-ruled Myanmar earlier today sentenced the country's former civilian3 leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, to seven more years in prison. Suu Kyi was arrested when the military seized power in a coup4 nearly two years ago, and she's been accused of corruption and other charges. Suu Kyi already received sentences of more than two dozen years in prison from previous charges, and human rights groups have called the proceedings5 against her a sham6. To understand what these latest verdicts mean, we've called Derek Mitchell. He's president of the National Democratic Institute. Derek, so what do you make of these rulings against her?
DEREK MITCHELL: Well, I agree with those human rights commentators7. This is a foregone conclusion. The whole process, the trial - so call - was a farce8. Veneer9 of a rule of law in Burma, or Myanmar, is there - a veneer - but it's no more than that. There is no rule of law in Myanmar.
MART?NEZ: Is it obvious to you - is it one of those things that's impossible to deny, that the rulings are a sham?
MITCHELL: Yeah, it's impossible. This was a foregone conclusion. I mean, they want to sideline Aung San Suu Kyi. They see her as a threat to their power. Every time they've had any kind of elections, which is what the military wants to do again in 2023, is have "an election" in quotes - every time they have a real election, she wins. She and her party win. And that happened a couple years ago. They don't like that, so they want to put her away, basically permanently10 sideline her, so they can assume power and all the trappings that come with it.
MART?NEZ: So it seems like civilians11 in Myanmar have a lot of trust, or at least they like her enough to keep electing her.
MITCHELL: Well, yeah, she's the symbol of - she's the hopeful symbol of the country. She's a unique figure. She's the daughter of the independence leader from the 1940s. She's led the democracy movement for decades. She's won the Nobel Peace Prize. She's won numerous prizes. I think most of your listeners will know that name, generally. And she remains12 really powerful as a symbol of resistance or a symbol of hope, a symbol of democracy in the country. So people rally around her on that basis. So, yes, that makes her uniquely challenging to the military, uniquely dangerous.
MART?NEZ: The U.N. Security Council had a resolution condemning13 the actions of the military junta14. What impact do you think that will have, if any?
MITCHELL: It has a very important symbolic15 impact. The junta does care what the world thinks of it. It wants the coup to be normalized. I think its strategy was to weather the storm that would naturally come after the February 2021 coup. But then after weathering that storm, people get used to it and then accommodate to it. Some countries have. Some in the region, particularly Asia, have. But overall, the U.N. Security Council coming out and saying, this is unacceptable; this must end. Even including Russia and China, who normally vetoes these resolutions - they abstained16 in this case, allowed it to go forward - sends a signal to the junta that their desire to normalize what they've done is not working.
MART?NEZ: Thirty seconds left, Derek. I know President Biden signing the BURMA Act provides humanitarian17 aid to the country and also imposes targeted sanctions. What kind of a difference could that make in Myanmar?
MITCHELL: Well, I think that does send a very - again, a very powerful signal about U.S. policy. I think it also sends a signal from Congress to the Biden administration that they want continued pressure, heightened pressure, more support for the opposition18, the democratic opposition, more pressure against the junta, more intense diplomacy19 with their allies - all of that to try to reverse what's happened and show again that what the junta has done cannot be normalized.
MART?NEZ: Derek Mitchell is the president of the National Democratic Institute. Derek, thanks.
MITCHELL: Thank you.
1 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 coup | |
n.政变;突然而成功的行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 sham | |
n./adj.假冒(的),虚伪(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 farce | |
n.闹剧,笑剧,滑稽戏;胡闹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 veneer | |
n.(墙上的)饰面,虚饰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 permanently | |
adv.永恒地,永久地,固定不变地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 condemning | |
v.(通常因道义上的原因而)谴责( condemn的现在分词 );宣判;宣布…不能使用;迫使…陷于不幸的境地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 junta | |
n.团体;政务审议会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 symbolic | |
adj.象征性的,符号的,象征主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 abstained | |
v.戒(尤指酒),戒除( abstain的过去式和过去分词 );弃权(不投票) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 humanitarian | |
n.人道主义者,博爱者,基督凡人论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 diplomacy | |
n.外交;外交手腕,交际手腕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|