-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Russia claims U.S. labs across Ukraine are secretly developing biological weapons
Russia's attempts to convince the world that its invasion of Ukraine is justified2 have mostly fallen flat in the U.S. But a recent disinformation campaign has gained some traction3.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Russia's disinformation campaigns to justify4 invading Ukraine have failed up to now, but Russia keeps trying. And one conspiracy5 theory is gaining some ground here in the United States. It's spreading through some of the same channels that domestic extremists rely on.
NPR's Odette Yousef covers domestic extremism, so she's on this story. Good morning.
ODETTE YOUSEF, BYLINE6: Good morning.
INSKEEP: What's the Russian narrative7?
YOUSEF: Well, this has come to be known as the biolabs conspiracy, Steve, and it goes like this. The U.S. has laboratories all over Ukraine where it's secretly developing biological weapons or conducting dangerous experiments, and so Russia's using this to justify its attack on Ukraine, you know, to protect itself and perhaps even the wider world.
You know, this claim isn't new, Steve. Russia has a long history, dating back to Soviet8 times, of claiming that the U.S. has been developing biological or chemical weapons and even, in the 1980s, claimed that the virus that causes AIDS was a result of that. But I think the thing that's notable now is that this was one of several disinfo narratives9 that was generally floating around and not gaining too much traction when the war began, until a Twitter user, who went under a handle @WarClandestine, seized on it in late February.
INSKEEP: Oh, that's when you know something is really true, when a random10 person without their name on a Twitter account says. Yeah, so who's @WarClandestine?
YOUSEF: So it's an account that belongs to somebody who traffics in the QAnon conspiracy theory. In the past, they've tweeted extremist views, calling for the execution of some public figures. I spoke11 with Alex Kaplan about this. He's a senior researcher at Media Matters, and he said that this was a really important inflection point in the life of this narrative.
ALEX KAPLAN: I actually consider it to be potentially the most significant failure for a mainstream12 social media platform to enforce their QAnon crackdown since they started in mid-2020 because the consequences of it have been so significant.
YOUSEF: You know, Steve, the QAnon community was maybe predisposed to believe this kind of claim. You know, it's already somewhat sympathetic to Russia and Vladimir Putin and, shall we say, skeptical13 of the U.S. government. And this has turned out to be a windfall for the Kremlin. Chinese state media have amplified14 it. And here in the U.S., it's tipped into a more mainstream right, you know, when Tucker Carlson started talking about it on his show on Fox News.
INSKEEP: Are there any facts here at all?
YOUSEF: Well, since 2005, the Department of Defense15 has partnered with Ukraine through something called the Biological Threat Reduction Program, which basically supports 46 labs that are run by local officials in Ukraine to deal with or detect pathogens that would be harmful if released into the wider world. So, for example, helping16 to monitor the spread of COVID-19 or defending against the spread of something called African swine fever. But, you know, the U.N. has said it's not aware of any bioweapons program in Ukraine.
INSKEEP: OK, so you have something that's for public health to detect pathogens that gets twisted into something to spread them. Is this changing any minds in the United States?
YOUSEF: No. You know, popular sentiment in the U.S. still seems to be overwhelmingly against Russia in this conflict. But I did put this question to Jared Holt. He's with the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic17 Research Lab.
JARED HOLT: What I do worry this could do is provide people who are maybe skeptical or predisposed to conspiratorial18 thinking an easy ramp19 to, you know, dismiss the horrors that are being reported from news agencies all around the world about what's happening to people in Ukraine.
YOUSEF: And, you know, U.S. officials have warned this could be a false flag narrative to justify, you know, Russia possibly using chemical weapons in this war.
INSKEEP: NPR's Odette Yousef, thanks.
YOUSEF: Thank you.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 traction | |
n.牵引;附着摩擦力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 justify | |
vt.证明…正当(或有理),为…辩护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 conspiracy | |
n.阴谋,密谋,共谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 narrative | |
n.叙述,故事;adj.叙事的,故事体的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 Soviet | |
adj.苏联的,苏维埃的;n.苏维埃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 random | |
adj.随机的;任意的;n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 skeptical | |
adj.怀疑的,多疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 amplified | |
放大,扩大( amplify的过去式和过去分词 ); 增强; 详述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 forensic | |
adj.法庭的,雄辩的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 conspiratorial | |
adj.阴谋的,阴谋者的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 ramp | |
n.暴怒,斜坡,坡道;vi.作恐吓姿势,暴怒,加速;vt.加速 | |
参考例句: |
|
|