-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Counterterrorism researchers say they lack the data to prevent future violence
A year ago, the Biden administration launched a national plan to counter domestic terrorism. But are federal agencies hampering2 anti-terrorism efforts by failing to report basic data?
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
One year ago, the Biden administration launched the first national plan to counter domestic extremism. It aims to address what top national security officials say is one of the most significant threats to the country. That threat earned renewed focus only a few weeks ago, when a white gunman shot 10 Black people in a racist3 attack at a Buffalo4 grocery store. He has now been charged with a federal hate crime. But even with heightened federal attention on the issue, lawmakers and counterterrorism experts say they lack a critical component5 - data. NPR's Odette Yousef covers domestic extremism and joins us now. Good morning, Odette.
ODETTE YOUSEF, BYLINE6: Good morning.
MARTIN: All right. So officials are saying they lack data. What exactly is missing?
YOUSEF: Well, Rachel, before I can answer that, let me give you some context. Last week, at least two Senate committees held hearings focusing on domestic extremism and what can be done to prevent another tragic7 attack like what happened in Buffalo. But what emerged was a really deep partisan8 divide over how law enforcement should identify and go after threats. You know, Republicans were largely pushing back against focusing exclusively on white supremacist violence, suggesting that it's just as bad from actors on the far left. And it seems that this disagreement might be overcome if they could just agree on the numbers, you know, but lawmakers on both sides complained that they haven't been getting the numbers. They're supposed to get, you know, annual reports on domestic terrorism from the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. Those reports have been delayed. And when I contacted those agencies, neither explained the delays or said when the latest report would come out.
MARTIN: But haven't we heard both the FBI and Homeland Security point to the threat from white supremacists as a priority?
YOUSEF: Yes. You know, DHS officials have said white supremacist extremists are the most persistent9 and lethal10 threat in the U.S. The FBI says most of their caseload when it comes to racially or ethnically11 motivated violent extremism involves white supremacy12. But one of the issues is that the FBI has changed how they categorize the data. During the Trump13 era, the agency collapsed14 classifications of political or ideological15 motivators of domestic terrorism from roughly a dozen down to just five, and one of those is racially or ethnically motivated violence. But, Rachel, that means that you're now rolling together, you know, both white supremacists and violent Black supremacists into a single category.
MARTIN: OK. So explain why that matters.
YOUSEF: Well, counterterrorism experts like Michael German say that this leaves federal agencies with tremendous discretion16 over where they direct their resources. He's with the Brennan Center for Justice. And here's some of his congressional testimony17 from last week.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
MICHAEL GERMAN: I think Portland, Ore., is a good example, where the federal government charged almost a hundred people during the civil unrest following the murder of George Floyd. But groups from outside of Oregon were traveling in far-right militant18 groups, like the Proud Boys, were coming into Oregon and instigating19 violence and committing violence on the street with very little law enforcement interference.
YOUSEF: And German said that, in turn, allowed the Proud Boys to continue building their network and organization, Rachel, ultimately to lay the groundwork for their involvement in the January 6 attack at the Capitol. And even though violent white supremacists currently present the most lethal and persistent domestic terrorism threat, you know, that threat changes over time. And so having consistent and timely data can allow federal agencies to be more nimble and accountable when it comes to responding to the evolving threat.
MARTIN: NPR's Odette Yousef. She covers domestic extremism. Thank you so much, Odette.
YOUSEF: My pleasure.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 hampering | |
妨碍,束缚,限制( hamper的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 racist | |
n.种族主义者,种族主义分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 buffalo | |
n.(北美)野牛;(亚洲)水牛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 tragic | |
adj.悲剧的,悲剧性的,悲惨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 persistent | |
adj.坚持不懈的,执意的;持续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 lethal | |
adj.致死的;毁灭性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 ethnically | |
adv.人种上,民族上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 collapsed | |
adj.倒塌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 ideological | |
a.意识形态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 militant | |
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 instigating | |
v.使(某事物)开始或发生,鼓动( instigate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|