-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
What legal implications arise after Indiana approves an abortion1 ban?
NPR's A Martínez speaks with law professor Melissa Murray about Indiana's new abortion ban, which is the first law restricting abortion since the Supreme3 Court struck down Roe4 v. Wade5.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
For the first time since Roe v. Wade was overturned, a state has passed a new law restricting abortions6. It's Indiana, and it takes effect September 15. Here to talk through the implications and whether other states may follow, I'm joined by New York University legal scholar Melissa Murray.
Let's start off with the implications this bill might have on a national level.
MELISSA MURRAY: Well, Indiana will certainly invite other laws in other states - laws that are restrictive. The Indiana law does provide for an exception for emergency care and for the health of the mother. But it doesn't really define what constitutes an emergency. And that really has been the issue as these laws have taken effect after the Dobbs decision - trying to determine where medical judgment7 ends and the law begins. And I think we'll see that kind of confusion throughout the country.
MART?NEZ: Considering the exception you just mentioned, is it not as extreme as some of the other laws that we have seen on the books lately?
MURRAY: Well, again, extreme is a relative...
MART?NEZ: Yeah.
MURRAY: ...Term here. It does provide for an exception, but it doesn't really provide much guidance for what constitutes an exigent circumstance that would allow for abortions. And the Indiana law also provides for a very Byzantine process for actually determining whether an abortion is appropriate and necessary. And so in those cases, it still makes access to lifesaving care very difficult in an exigent circumstance.
MART?NEZ: Now, Professor, voters in Kansas recently voted to protect abortion by a wide margin8, actually. Why such a contrast between the legislative9 process in Indiana and the ballot10 initiative in another state - a red state - in Kansas?
MURRAY: Well, I think that's the difference between direct democracy and representative democracy. In Indiana, the voters' preferences were translated through the single vote of their representative in the state legislature, which misses a lot of nuance11. In Kansas, individual voters could go directly to the ballot box, and they could register their preferences. And even in ruby-red Kansas, where there are likely a lot of voters who are pro-life, there may be some section of that pro-life constituency who may have viewed what has happened in the country since the Dobbs decision as far too extreme even for their preferences. That kind of nuance likely could not be translated in a representative format12 in the Indiana state legislature.
MART?NEZ: Do you possibly foresee other states following Indiana's lead?
MURRAY: Well, I think Indiana's lead is the more likely prospect13. Many states don't have the mechanisms14 for ballot initiatives in the way that Kansas does. So that kind of direct participation15 isn't available there. And even that kind of direct participation can be subject to democratic distortion. In Kansas, it was the state legislature that put the amendment16 to the people. And they did so in the August primary for the purpose of turning out more Republican voters who would likely vote pro-choice - or pro-life. In Indiana, I think we're going to see more states following that model because representative government is really the model that we have. And I think we'll likely see more extreme laws being passed.
MART?NEZ: So the Supreme Court could be allowing this to expand in the future.
MURRAY: Well, they've actually encouraged it. The majority opinion in Dobbs said that this issue would be returned to the states, where the people, through their state legislatures, could determine this question for themselves. So it is an exact invitation to the state legislatures to do just that.
MART?NEZ: Eli Lilly is a pharmaceutical17 company based in Indianapolis - a big employer in Indiana. And they say now that they're going to plan for employment growth outside of the state. They're going to have trouble, they think, to attract employees to Indiana. Does this kind of corporate18 pushback make a difference?
MURRAY: I think it does. This - what I call soft law is something that we've seen in other contexts. Think, for example, of marriage equality. For many years, way before states permitted same-sex marriage or even domestic partnership19, it was corporate interests who provided for same-sex couples to bring their partners on to employee benefits programs and things of that nature. And they basically normalized this idea that same-sex unions were OK and paved the way for the states to eventually do that. So again, here, this may be important leverage20 - the corporate interests saying that they're going to leave the state or provide for expansion of their business elsewhere.
MART?NEZ: Briefly21, can abortion rights supporters stop the ban in Indiana from going into effect September 15?
MURRAY: I think the law will certainly be challenged by reproductive rights groups. I don't know if it's likely to be struck down by the state courts or by federal courts. But what that challenge will likely do is delay the process of this law going into effect on September 15.
MART?NEZ: That's Melissa Murray. She's a law professor at NYU.
Professor, thanks.
MURRAY: Thank you.
1 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 roe | |
n.鱼卵;獐鹿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 wade | |
v.跋涉,涉水;n.跋涉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 abortions | |
n.小产( abortion的名词复数 );小产胎儿;(计划)等中止或夭折;败育 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 margin | |
n.页边空白;差额;余地,余裕;边,边缘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 nuance | |
n.(意义、意见、颜色)细微差别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 format | |
n.设计,版式;[计算机]格式,DOS命令:格式化(磁盘),用于空盘或使用过的磁盘建立新空盘来存储数据;v.使格式化,设计,安排 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 mechanisms | |
n.机械( mechanism的名词复数 );机械装置;[生物学] 机制;机械作用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 pharmaceutical | |
adj.药学的,药物的;药用的,药剂师的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 partnership | |
n.合作关系,伙伴关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 leverage | |
n.力量,影响;杠杆作用,杠杆的力量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 briefly | |
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|