-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Biden administration moves to make DACA harder to challenge in court
NPR's A Martinez talks to Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas about the Deferred2 Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program which is now in the federal government's code of regulations.
A MART?NEZ, HOST:
The DACA program, or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, first started accepting applications ten years ago this month. However, in the summer of 2021, a series of court decisions made its future more uncertain. A district court in Texas ruled the program illegal. The U.S. Supreme3 Court issued a stay on that ruling pending4 an appeal from the Biden administration. So for now, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has said it will continue accepting new DACA applications, even though it can't actually grant them. But on Wednesday, DACA got a bit of a boost. Alejandro Mayorkas is secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. He told us DACA is now in the federal government's code of regulation, something that has not been done before, which Mayorkas says fortifies5 DACA and preserves it.
You know, when you say fortifies and preserves DACA, what does that mean? Does that mean that it'll be tougher to challenge in court?
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS: That is absolutely right. One of the attacks was that the government, in order to establish DACA, needed to proceed by way of notice and comment rulemaking by promulgating6 a regulation. While we disagree with that assertion, nevertheless, what we have done is we have proceeded to publish a regulation. And now DACA is codified7 in the Code of Federal Regulations. It is now a matter of regulatory law.
MART?NEZ: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will issue an opinion on DACA later this year. It is, Secretary, a conservative-leaning court. Are you worried that they will rule it unlawful?
MAYORKAS: We feel very strongly that we are on firm legal footing. The court is, of course, going to make its independent judgment9 with respect to the lawfulness10 of DACA. It has been the subject of disagreement. We are hopeful that the court will agree with our legal interpretation11 and allow DACA to stand. It's been of such tremendous importance to and benefit for more than 800,000 young people. And it's been of such benefit to so many communities across the country to whom these and for whom these young people have contributed so much.
MART?NEZ: If the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals does not see things your way, will President Biden appeal DACA to the Supreme Court?
MAYORKAS: I think we're going to take it step by step. We intend to fight for DACA in the courts. We believe very firmly in DACA. I will say that we remain hopeful that the legislature, that Congress will pass laws that really make DACA permanent.
MART?NEZ: Why do you think that hasn't happened yet?
MAYORKAS: You know, DACA has really tremendous support on both sides of the aisle12. It's something of tremendous popularity in the United States. And we're hopeful that the legislature will act. You know, legislation in the immigration arena13 is certainly not facile. And nevertheless, we remain hopeful that it'll happen. And we continue to fight for it.
MART?NEZ: DACA now becoming a code in the federal government's Code of Regulations - why hasn't that happened before? You were director of Citizenship14 and Immigration Services during the Obama administration. Why wasn't all that done back then?
MAYORKAS: Well, we did not believe that regulatory authority was necessary to support the DACA program. We were successful in implementing15 it as a matter of policy. Hundreds of thousands of youth benefited from it. And it is in this prior administration, in the attacks that have been levied16 against this successful and meaningful program that the need for regulatory strengthening proved necessary. And so when that, in fact, arose and when we took office, we proceeded with speed.
MART?NEZ: So just to be clear, this is not a pathway to citizenship for DACA recipients17. So why should people then continue to apply for DACA if that's not part of this?
MAYORKAS: Well, because it - you're correct, A, that it is not a path to citizenship. We need Congress to pass legislation to provide that path, something that we believe very strongly in and we continue to hope and fight for. But what DACA does is it provides lawful8 presence for the youth who qualify for it, meaning they are not subject to removal. They are not unlawfully present during the period that they have DACA. And very importantly, they receive work authorization18 so that they can work legally and receive those critical protections and benefits.
MART?NEZ: That is Alejandro Mayorkas, secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security. Secretary, thanks.
MAYORKAS: Thank you very much.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 deferred | |
adj.延期的,缓召的v.拖延,延缓,推迟( defer的过去式和过去分词 );服从某人的意愿,遵从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 fortifies | |
筑防御工事于( fortify的第三人称单数 ); 筑堡于; 增强; 强化(食品) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 promulgating | |
v.宣扬(某事物)( promulgate的现在分词 );传播;公布;颁布(法令、新法律等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 codified | |
v.把(法律)编成法典( codify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 lawfulness | |
法制,合法 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 aisle | |
n.(教堂、教室、戏院等里的)过道,通道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 arena | |
n.竞技场,运动场所;竞争场所,舞台 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 citizenship | |
n.市民权,公民权,国民的义务(身份) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 implementing | |
v.实现( implement的现在分词 );执行;贯彻;使生效 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 levied | |
征(兵)( levy的过去式和过去分词 ); 索取; 发动(战争); 征税 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 recipients | |
adj.接受的;受领的;容纳的;愿意接受的n.收件人;接受者;受领者;接受器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 authorization | |
n.授权,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|