-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Ukrainian soldiers will be trained in combined arms tactics in Germany
The U.S. and allies are scaling up training of Ukrainian troops in Germany. NPR's Dwane Brown talks to Raphael Cohen of the RAND Corporation about what this means for the war against Russia.
DWANE BROWN, HOST:
Ukraine is receiving more than light tanks from its allies. Ukrainians will soon train to use Patriot2 missile systems at an Army base in Oklahoma. Brigadier General Pat Ryder outlined the training at a Pentagon press conference.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PAT RYDER: It will consist of training in the classrooms. It will consist of training on the Patriot systems and then, of course, in a simulation lab as well before they actually deploy3 the capability4 on the battlefield.
BROWN: Now, the Pentagon also announced plans back in December to train large units of Ukrainian soldiers in combined arm tactics in Germany. Raphael Cohen, a senior political scientist at the RAND Corporation, joins me now to talk about how this could affect the war in Ukraine.
Good morning, Dr. Cohen.
RAPHAEL COHEN: Good morning. Thanks for having me on.
BROWN: Absolutely. What is the principle of combat arms tactics, and how does this training help the Ukrainians in combat?
COHEN: So combined arms is the integration5 of multiple different kinds of weapons on - to achieve an assault and military effect - so in this case, infantry6 tanks, artillery7, aircraft, if possible. And there's only a handful of places that can train realistically on that. The United States has some of them in Germany, but also in the United States. And so the ability for us to train the Ukrainians to conduct these very complex maneuvers8 is really key for them building combat capability as they push forward with their offensive.
BROWN: And the U.S. and its Western allies have actually been training Ukrainian fighters since the war began more than 10 months ago. How much of an escalation9 is this new training?
COHEN: So I don't think this is really a difference in kind. It's a difference in scale, though. I mean, even before the conflict began, we had a training mission actually in Ukraine up until February of 2022. What this does, though, is allow us to train at a greater scale. And I think that is in some ways an escalation, but perhaps not as much as people might think of this.
BROWN: Train on a greater scale - now, there was some initial apprehension10, of course, among the U.S. and its allies about using weapons that might provoke Russia. In your view, why has that position changed?
COHEN: So I think there are two big factors at play. First, we're now almost a year into this conflict. And as the conflict has progressed, I think American policymakers have felt a little bit more comfortable about what Russian red lines are and therefore a little bit more comfortable about what kind of equipment we can provide to Ukrainians. The second major factor, however, is, frankly11, Russian brutality12 in Ukraine. That shapes our risk calculus13, but it also shapes the risk calculus of NATO allies. And I think your previous reporting highlighted this fact. And so when we take any sort of attempt to aid the Ukrainians, we want to do that in lockstep with our NATO partners. And so as Russia's actions have begun to emphasize - and sort of increasing harm toward civilians14, that makes the alliance as a whole want to take more proactive measures to help the Ukrainians in their own defense15.
BROWN: And, Dr. Cohen, my last question here - the Russians haven't really used their air force much so far. What's keeping them out of the skies over Ukraine?
COHEN: So there are several factors at play here. One is Russian pilots. There's a shortage of them. Russian equipment is also - has been suffering from serious maintenance issues. And then to further combat this, the Russians are also suffering from munitions16 shortfalls as well. Now, in addition to all of that on the Russian side, there's also the fact that we've been providing a lot of air defenses to the Ukrainians. And the Russians don't want to lose any more equipment.
BROWN: And, sir, we're going to leave it right there. Raphael Cohen, thank you for your time this morning.
COHEN: Thanks for having me on.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 deploy | |
v.(军)散开成战斗队形,布置,展开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 capability | |
n.能力;才能;(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 integration | |
n.一体化,联合,结合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 infantry | |
n.[总称]步兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 artillery | |
n.(军)火炮,大炮;炮兵(部队) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 maneuvers | |
n.策略,谋略,花招( maneuver的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 escalation | |
n.扩大,增加 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 brutality | |
n.野蛮的行为,残忍,野蛮 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 calculus | |
n.微积分;结石 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 civilians | |
平民,百姓( civilian的名词复数 ); 老百姓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 munitions | |
n.军火,弹药;v.供应…军需品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|