-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
A Georgia judge weighs release of a grand jury report into 2020 election interference
A Georgia judge will soon decide what, if any, parts of a special grand jury report will be made public following an eight-month investigation2 into efforts by former President Donald Trump3 and his allies to overturn the state's 2020 election results.
The special purpose grand jury, which was dissolved earlier this month after completing its work, did not have indictment4 powers but could use gathered evidence and testimony5 to recommend that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis seek charges. Several people, ranging from Trump's onetime personal attorney to Republicans who falsely claimed to be presidential electors, were informed they were targets of the investigation.
Jurors voted to release their report to the public, but the extremely rare nature of the special grand jury and limited legal authority have led to hurdles6 that could delay disclosure of the findings.
Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney will hold a hearing Tuesday to determine if releasing all or parts of the report would conflict with other laws and precedents7 that have historically prevented grand jury reports from making allegations of criminal wrongdoing without an accompanying indictment — which this panel could not recommend.
At the hearing, the DA's office, media outlets8 and potential targets of the investigation that might be named in the report are expected to argue their cases for releasing — or redacting — relevant sections of the findings.
What could be in the report?
Georgia was one of several key states that saw a coordinated9, sustained effort to challenge the 2020 presidential results, in which Joe Biden defeated Trump.
In February 2021, Willis announced an investigation into efforts to undo10 Trump's defeat in Georgia, asking state officials to preserve records from the election, and in January 2022 she requested a special purpose grand jury be convened11 to investigate "the facts and circumstances relating directly or indirectly12 to possible attempts to disrupt the lawful13 administration of the 2020 elections in the State of Georgia."
At the time, Willis listed several potential crimes, ranging from solicitation14 of election fraud to making false statements to governmental officials to racketeering.
Broadly, the work of the 26-person panel centered around two major themes:
the pressure campaign to reverse Trump's roughly 12,000-vote loss in Georgia's thrice-counted election;
and the coordinated effort to send so-called "alternate" slates15 of Republican presidential electors in states won by Biden.
The most infamous16 example of the former is Trump's phone call to Republican Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, exhorting17 him to "find 11,780 votes" and undo Biden's victory ahead of the counting of Electoral College votes.
There were other calls, too, like South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham's conversation with Raffensperger regarding absentee ballots19, and another leaked call Trump had with Georgia's top election investigator20 about a review of ballot18 envelopes.
Other areas of interest that have appeared in court filings include: a number of unofficial legislative21 hearings where Rudy Giuliani and others spread falsehoods about the state's election system and results, and attacked a pair of Fulton County poll workers with baseless claims that led to death threats; the resignation of U.S. Attorney BJay Pak amid turmoil22 with the Justice Department over pursuing false claims of voter fraud; and unauthorized access of voting equipment in a rural Georgia county.
On the second front, Willis and the special purpose grand jury appear to have narrowed in on the efforts across multiple swing states, including Georgia, to send documents from Republicans falsely claiming to be official presidential electors.
At least 17 people so far have been informed they could be prosecuted23 for their actions, including the 16 fake electors and Giuliani. Willis has been disqualified from investigating one of the sham24 electors, newly elected Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, after Jones argued a fundraiser that Willis hosted for his eventual25 general election opponent created a conflict of interest.
The report could also name other incidents that prosecutors26 should look into further, other people who should be interviewed and other crimes that might have been committed.
Who has been interviewed?
The special grand jury used subpoena27 power to compel dozens of people to testify over the last several months, though faced difficulties from out-of-state witnesses.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, Attorney General Chris Carr, Raffensperger and other state employees appeared before the panel, as did local election officials and elected officials who played both large and small roles in defending, running or attacking the election.
Some subpoenaed28 witnesses — like Trump-aligned attorneys John Eastman, Jenna Ellis and Kenneth Chesebro — tried unsuccessfully to fight their testimony in court but ultimately had to appear. Sen. Graham's efforts to halt his testimony were argued all the way to the U.S. Supreme29 Court, which refused to block a lower court's ruling that Graham was protected from questioning about activities related to being a lawmaker but could answer for other statements and actions.
Giuliani — who is also being sued for defamation30 by the two Fulton County election workers he accused of fraudulently counting ballots and "surreptitiously passing around USB ports as if they are vials of heroin31 or cocaine32" — testified for hours behind closed doors after failed attempts to delay his appearance before the grand jury.
The report could also shed light on others who testified without needing a subpoena, as well as evidence used to draw conclusions about potential violations33 of state law.
What about Trump?
One potential witness who was never issued a subpoena to testify is Trump himself. Many of his actions and statements were in the public domain34, uncovered via reporting or shared through testimony from others, but it is unclear why the panel did not seek out Trump's testimony firsthand, as he is a central figure in the investigation.
It is not clear what the report will say about Trump's role or likelihood he could face charges, though Trump has retained several Georgia-based lawyers including Drew Findling, a high-profile attorney best known for defending celebrity35 rap artists (and for past anti-Trump comments on social media). Campaign finance records show that over the second half of 2022, pro-Trump political action committees paid out nearly half a million dollars for "legal consulting" to Findling's law firm and another attorney, Jennifer Little.
In a statement to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Monday, Trump's attorneys said they would not be involved in Tuesday's hearing and have never been a part of the special grand jury process. "He was never subpoenaed nor asked to come in voluntarily by this grand jury or anyone in the Fulton County District Attorney's office," the statement reads in part. "Therefore, we can assume that the grand jury did their job and looked at the facts and the law, as we have, and concluded there were no violations of the law by President Trump."
But it is possible the report could still implicate36 the former president in wrongdoing, and the district attorney could still seek an indictment.
What's next?
After the hearing, Judge McBurney could rule that the report should be made public in its entirety, with redactions regarding specific people and specific laws they might have broken, or opt37 to keep the entire thing under wraps pending38 further review.
Any of those rulings could be appealed.
The district attorney's office has received the full report and can issue indictments39 through a regular grand jury process with or without the report being publicized. Willis might also push to keep the report from the public until her office makes decisions about charges.
Fulton County's investigation into election interference is one of several inquiries40 Trump is facing, along with a federal probe into classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago and Trump's role in the leadup to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, and New York-based investigations41 into Trump's business empire.
1 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 indictment | |
n.起诉;诉状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 hurdles | |
n.障碍( hurdle的名词复数 );跳栏;(供人或马跳跃的)栏架;跨栏赛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 precedents | |
引用单元; 范例( precedent的名词复数 ); 先前出现的事例; 前例; 先例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 outlets | |
n.出口( outlet的名词复数 );经销店;插座;廉价经销店 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coordinated | |
adj.协调的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 convened | |
召开( convene的过去式 ); 召集; (为正式会议而)聚集; 集合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 solicitation | |
n.诱惑;揽货;恳切地要求;游说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 slates | |
(旧时学生用以写字的)石板( slate的名词复数 ); 板岩; 石板瓦; 石板色 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 infamous | |
adj.声名狼藉的,臭名昭著的,邪恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 exhorting | |
v.劝告,劝说( exhort的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 ballot | |
n.(不记名)投票,投票总数,投票权;vi.投票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 ballots | |
n.投票表决( ballot的名词复数 );选举;选票;投票总数v.(使)投票表决( ballot的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 investigator | |
n.研究者,调查者,审查者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 legislative | |
n.立法机构,立法权;adj.立法的,有立法权的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 turmoil | |
n.骚乱,混乱,动乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 prosecuted | |
a.被起诉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 sham | |
n./adj.假冒(的),虚伪(的) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 eventual | |
adj.最后的,结局的,最终的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 prosecutors | |
检举人( prosecutor的名词复数 ); 告发人; 起诉人; 公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 subpoena | |
n.(法律)传票;v.传讯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 subpoenaed | |
v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 defamation | |
n.诽谤;中伤 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 heroin | |
n.海洛因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 cocaine | |
n.可卡因,古柯碱(用作局部麻醉剂) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 violations | |
违反( violation的名词复数 ); 冒犯; 违反(行为、事例); 强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 implicate | |
vt.使牵连其中,涉嫌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 opt | |
vi.选择,决定做某事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 indictments | |
n.(制度、社会等的)衰败迹象( indictment的名词复数 );刑事起诉书;公诉书;控告 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 inquiries | |
n.调查( inquiry的名词复数 );疑问;探究;打听 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 investigations | |
(正式的)调查( investigation的名词复数 ); 侦查; 科学研究; 学术研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|