-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Law professor looks at whether Supreme1 Court's Thomas may have violated ethics2 rules
NPR's Leila Fadel speaks with NYU law professor Stephen Gillers about whether Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas might have violated ethics rules for accepting luxury trips for decades.
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
We're here in Studio 31 at NPR headquarters. On the other side of the glass, in the other room, is our director Lilly Quiroz and our technical director Zac Coleman. And, guys, when I heard this story of a billionaire taking Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on vacation, my first thought was, well, he can do that. The Supreme Court has famously failed to adopt any ethics rules for itself. But when I read a little bit further, the investigation4 by ProPublica asserted that Justice Thomas violated an actual existing law - not just an ethics guideline, but the law - by failing to disclose almost 20 years of regular vacations and travel. New York University law professor Stephen Gillers is here to talk about it. Good morning.
STEPHEN GILLERS: Good morning.
INSKEEP: What does that law say?
GILLERS: It's the Ethics in Government Act, and it applies throughout the federal government, including to the justices. And so we don't have to worry about the absence of ethics rules for the court because the statute5 itself enables the government to impose reporting obligations on the justices reporting personal hospitality and gifts.
INSKEEP: Does that mean that Justice Thomas can let someone pay for his vacation, but he just has to tell the government and, in effect, the public that he did so?
GILLERS: Well, yes and no. I mean, he does, and every other federal judge does. Depending upon how you interpret the phrase personal hospitality of an individual, Justice Thomas had a very weak argument that he did not have to report the Harlan Crow princely gifts because they came from Harlan Crow personally. That argument is wrong, but it's not impossible. And he, Justice Thomas, chose to adopt the interpretation6 that enabled him not to reveal Harlan Crow's generosity7.
INSKEEP: Oh, wait. You're saying that - Thomas is saying, I would have to report this if it came from a corporation, and Harlan Crow is, of course, connected with a big interest, but I don't have to report it if it comes from a friend of mine. Is that right?
GILLERS: Well, that's the interpretation that he had - that is, he doesn't have to report personal hospitality, and that means a invitation from a person, which Harlan Crow is, regardless of who is footing the bill and regardless of how luxurious8 the hospitality may be.
INSKEEP: Well, I'm trying to figure out the appropriate form to pursue this. Democratic Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is calling for his impeachment9. But it's a Republican House. Hard to see that happening. I guess you don't bring it before the Supreme Court. What is the appropriate forum10 to pursue this question?
GILLERS: Well, I mean, theoretically, there can be a prosecution11, a civil or criminal prosecution. The statute gives the attorney general the power to seek civil or criminal remedies, but that's not going to happen.
INSKEEP: In about 10 seconds, could anything happen?
GILLERS: Probably not. I mean, if - well, what has happened is that last month, the Judicial12 Conference amended13 its rules so that this cannot happen again post-March.
INSKEEP: OK, the Judicial Conference of the United States, which oversees14 federal courts. Stephen Gillers, thanks so much. Really appreciate it.
GILLERS: You're welcome.
INSKEEP: He is a New York University law professor.
1 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 statute | |
n.成文法,法令,法规;章程,规则,条例 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 generosity | |
n.大度,慷慨,慷慨的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 luxurious | |
adj.精美而昂贵的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 forum | |
n.论坛,讨论会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 judicial | |
adj.司法的,法庭的,审判的,明断的,公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Amended | |
adj. 修正的 动词amend的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 oversees | |
v.监督,监视( oversee的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|