-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
How will the Ukraine document investigation1 work? A former DOJ 'leak czar' explains
Days after classified U.S. documents on the war in Ukraine surfaced on social media, the Pentagon and Justice Department are scrambling3 to figure out how they got there, what damage they could cause and whether any more might be on the way.
To recap: A small number of secret military documents were found on Twitter and Telegram on Wednesday, and researchers and social media sleuths have since discovered more on other sites — some posted as early as March 1.
The documents viewed by NPR appear to be briefing slides — put together daily for top Pentagon and national security officials — focused on Ukraine, with maps and charts pertaining4 to their troops and weapons, national security correspondent Greg Myre told Morning Edition.
Their discovery comes as Ukraine prepares to launch a counteroffensive sometime this spring, and it's not yet clear what kind of impact the new material could have on the trajectory5 of the war.
While there's still a lot we don't know, former Justice Department "leak czar" Brandon Van Grack says national security damage has certainly been done.
"The only debate now is how much damage there was and the threat is still live," he says. "We don't know if the individual or individuals still have access to classified information and whether there could be additional leaks, and so right now this has to be the top priority."
Van Grack held multiple national security-focused roles at the Justice Department, including leading the investigation into Edward Snowden after the then-National Security Agency contractor6 leaked thousands of documents in 2013. Van Grack is now a partner at Morrison & Foerster, which represents Discord7 — one of the sites where the Ukraine documents were shared.
He spoke8 with Morning Edition's A Martínez on Monday about what could be happening behind the scenes as law enforcement and intelligence officials work together to try to plug the leak and remediate the damage.
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
The FBI along with the DOJ is identifying what third parties, what companies may have relevant information, and issuing search warrants and subpoenas9 and that's probably what's been occurring through the weekend. The intelligence committee in coordination10 with the the FBI is also reviewing the leaked documents to see if they can identify ... who had access to them and any other identifying features.
On where he would start if he were in charge
There are multiple places to start, which is from the FBI, DOJ perspective, all of the reporting of companies and individuals who may have posted this or where it may have been posted, you're collecting that evidence. At the same time, you are closely coordinating11 with the intelligence community. There are multiple documents, and there are images in those documents ... and I think you are culling12 through that information to try to narrow the group of individuals who may have had access to it.
On the balance between plugging the leak and gathering13 evidence
You're walking and chewing gum at the same time. Right now the focus needs to be, and is, identifying who this person or these persons are, period. That has to be the priority. As that's going on, to the extent that they do identify someone, then you're starting to put together a charging document and figure out that aspect of it. But right now the priority has to be the identification and ensuring that there are no further leaks coming.
On whether there's any overlap14 with the DOJ's investigation into Biden and Trump's handling of classified documents
Because of special counsel appointments we don't know exactly what the overlap is, but there should be some overlap of those individuals and expertise15. And so certainly there's at least some subset of those persons who have been sprinting16 for the last few months on those cases and now would probably need to do some sort of pivot17 to focus on this for the time being.
On why the public should care about the handling of classified documents
This case shows why it is so critical that we enforce criminally the laws that make it unlawful to willfully retain or disclose classified information. There's millions of Americans that have access to ... untold18 amounts of classified information, and they can't all be monitored. And the way that you control that access, and ensure that it's not disclosed to people that don't have access, is to enforce these laws.
1 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 scrambling | |
v.快速爬行( scramble的现在分词 );攀登;争夺;(军事飞机)紧急起飞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 pertaining | |
与…有关系的,附属…的,为…固有的(to) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 trajectory | |
n.弹道,轨道 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 contractor | |
n.订约人,承包人,收缩肌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 discord | |
n.不和,意见不合,争论,(音乐)不和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 subpoenas | |
n.(传唤出庭的)传票( subpoena的名词复数 )v.(用传票)传唤(某人)( subpoena的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 coordination | |
n.协调,协作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 coordinating | |
v.使协调,使调和( coordinate的现在分词 );协调;协同;成为同等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 culling | |
n.选择,大批物品中剔出劣质货v.挑选,剔除( cull的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 gathering | |
n.集会,聚会,聚集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 overlap | |
v.重叠,与…交叠;n.重叠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 expertise | |
n.专门知识(或技能等),专长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 sprinting | |
v.短距离疾跑( sprint的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 pivot | |
v.在枢轴上转动;装枢轴,枢轴;adj.枢轴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 untold | |
adj.数不清的,无数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|