-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Why it's unlikely ethics1 rules on Supreme2 Court gift disclosures will work
The Supreme Court is facing ethics questions since a ProPublica investigation4 reported that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas received luxurious5 trips from Republican donor6 Harlan Crow for more than two decades. The investigation says he failed to report these trips in his annual financial disclosures.
Stricter regulations went into effect several weeks ago, saying that federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, must disclose when they receive gifts and "personal hospitality."
But Northwestern University law professor emeritus7 Steven Lubet told NPR's Leila Fadel that he doubts the justices will comply with stricter disclosure rules.
This conversation has been edited for length and clarity.
Well, there's no enforcement mechanism8. And in the past, the justices have adhered to them when they wanted to and not when they didn't. Justice Thomas says he'll follow the new interpretation9. I don't really doubt him about that, but it's all very contingent10 because Chief Justice [John] Roberts and before him, Chief Justice [William] Rehnquist, have both declined to say that the rules were validly11 applicable to the U.S. Supreme Court.
They're the Supreme Court. They do what they want.
On who enforces the rules that the Supreme Court makes
Well, they make the rules. There's an enforcement mechanism that, you know, the judges have life tenure12. Short of impeachment13, there's no penalty that's applicable to the judges at any level in the federal courts. There is a system in the lower courts of reporting, and it can lead to censure14 or reprimand, but it does not apply to the U.S. Supreme Court.
On whether there were pre-existing financial disclosure rules for federal judges and Supreme Court justices
There were rules before March 14th regarding gift disclosure. The justices said that they would comply with them. They do file annual reports disclosing, disclosing gifts. I would say that the previous rules definitely covered at least some parts of Justice Thomas's excursions with [Harlan] Crow. The new rules are much more specific and would absolutely require reporting of this sort of travel and lavish15 hospitality.
On what could be the answer to conflict of interest issues with Supreme Court justices
The Supreme Court is the only court in the United States that has never adopted a written code of ethics. Every other court has a written code. The U.S. Supreme Court has strenuously16 resisted announcing what its own standards of ethics are. That should be remedied. They should adopt a code of conduct. At the very least, this will let the public know what the justices expect of themselves, and there will be transparency that we have not had in the past.
1 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 luxurious | |
adj.精美而昂贵的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 donor | |
n.捐献者;赠送人;(组织、器官等的)供体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 emeritus | |
adj.名誉退休的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 contingent | |
adj.视条件而定的;n.一组,代表团,分遣队 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 validly | |
正当地,妥当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 tenure | |
n.终身职位;任期;(土地)保有权,保有期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 impeachment | |
n.弹劾;控告;怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 censure | |
v./n.责备;非难;责难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 lavish | |
adj.无节制的;浪费的;vt.慷慨地给予,挥霍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 strenuously | |
adv.奋发地,费力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|