-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Corporate1 funders return to GOP attorneys general who embraced election fraud claims
NPR's Michel Martin talks to Ilya Marritz of ProPublica about how corporate donations to a Republican attorneys general group dropped off after Jan. 6, but they're rolling in again — two years later.
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
After the attack on the Capitol in January of 2021, Republican states' attorneys general saw an exodus3 of corporate cash from their campaign organization. The AGs had associated themselves with the Stop the Steal movement that sought to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and many big companies wanted nothing to do with it. Two years later, though, those same Republican AGs are bringing in corporate cash again but have not changed their positions. That's according to a new story out today from ProPublica. The reporter, Ilya Marritz, is with us now to tell us more. Good morning, Ilya.
ILYA MARRITZ, BYLINE4: Good morning.
MARTIN: So at this point, it's an almost common position for Republicans to talk about fraud in elections. So why did it stand out when Republican attorneys general specifically took a position?
MARRITZ: AGs are incredibly powerful players in our democracy. A well-crafted legal motion from an attorney general can result in a nationwide injunction, or it could set a new precedent5. In the past year, Republican AGs have been very active on issues people care about - abortion6, the border, student loan forgiveness. And they have oversight7 over election law and voting.
MARTIN: Let me just ask you to go back to the beginning and just, you know, remind us. What was the attorney general's role in the Stop the Steal movement? How did they get involved?
MARRITZ: Yeah. So after Donald Trump8 lost the 2020 election, his campaign filed dozens of legal challenges to the vote, and almost all of them were dismissed. But then in December of that year, a challenge came in from the Republican attorney general of Texas. He filed an emergency motion with the Supreme9 Court, asking them to actually invalidate the vote in four states that went for Biden, and 17 other Republican AGs joined him in a motion. That motion was rejected. Then a few weeks later, just before the big Trump rally, a nonprofit linked to the Republican AGs called the Rule of Law Defense10 Fund blasted out this robocall, basically telling people to get to D.C.
MARTIN: So what happened when all this came to light?
MARRITZ: Basically, companies deserted11 the Republican Attorneys General Association, or RAGA. Donations fell off a cliff. Some donors12, like the University of Phoenix13, even demanded their money back. It was an exodus.
MARTIN: But then these companies that said that they wanted to support democracy, that that is why they were withdrawing their campaign contributions or not giving them, and then affirm the result of the election, according to your reporting, they started coming back. How did that happen?
MARRITZ: We got a glimpse of it from a briefing document prepared by RAGA for its then-chairman, the AG of South Carolina, Alan Wilson. He had a meeting scheduled with two lobbyists from UPS in the summer of 2021, and the prep doc basically lays it out. It says, please remind them that their memberships lapsed14 in February and ask that they renew this quarter. And then it lists a bunch of UPS' policy concerns, like labor15 issues. Now, ethicists say it is concerning when a business meets directly with a prosecutor16 about political fundraising, but it may be these businesses feel they need to have good relationships with AGs. UPS told us, we support elected officials in both parties.
MARTIN: So you're telling us that big business has come back to support the attorneys general. But you report this group, these Republican attorneys general as a group, have not really changed their position on that or not moderated. Tell us more about that.
MARRITZ: That's right. RAGA said there's no place for violence in our politics, and they support protecting the Constitution. But, you know, one example, after the FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate, many Republican AGs signed a legal brief in support of Trump, describing it as a ransacking17. And they poured money into candidates who denied the validity of elections, and some of them won.
MARTIN: That is Ilya Marritz. He reports on democracy for ProPublica, and he also covers Trump legal matters for NPR. Ilya, thank you so much.
MARRITZ: You're very welcome. Thank you.
1 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 transcript | |
n.抄本,誊本,副本,肄业证书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 exodus | |
v.大批离去,成群外出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 abortion | |
n.流产,堕胎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 oversight | |
n.勘漏,失察,疏忽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 deserted | |
adj.荒芜的,荒废的,无人的,被遗弃的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 phoenix | |
n.凤凰,长生(不死)鸟;引申为重生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 lapsed | |
adj.流失的,堕落的v.退步( lapse的过去式和过去分词 );陷入;倒退;丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 labor | |
n.劳动,努力,工作,劳工;分娩;vi.劳动,努力,苦干;vt.详细分析;麻烦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 prosecutor | |
n.起诉人;检察官,公诉人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 ransacking | |
v.彻底搜查( ransack的现在分词 );抢劫,掠夺 | |
参考例句: |
|
|