-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Adam Freedman
Today’s topic: Can the state force you to attend Alcoholics2 Anonymous3, or similar programs with religious overtones?
Before I go any further, I’m happy to tell you that this article is brought to you by Carbonite Pro4. For a free trial and to learn more, visit CarbonitePro.com.
Back to the issue:
Does AA Violate the Separation of Church and State?
I just got a fascinating question from Alicia, who writes in to say that in her home state of Wisconsin, substance abusers are sometimes required to attend Alcoholics Anonymous by their parole or probation5 officer. As Alicia observes, AA requires participants to accept a power greater than themselves--in short, God. She asks: “Is it a reasonable separation of church and state to send clients to meetings which discuss a higher power?”
Great question! I have to confess, my first reaction was “Oh, come on! AA isn’t a religion!” But it turns out that Alicia has put her finger on a serious constitutional issue.
Where is Separation of Church and State in the Constitution?
The relevant part of the First Amendment6 states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.” Those words are known as the “Establishment Clause.” One of the goals of the Founding Fathers was to prevent the federal government from creating an “established church,” as Britain had (and, indeed, still has). Clearly, the Establishment Clause prevents the government from doing that, but over the years, the Supreme7 Court has held that the clause prevents a wide variety of government actions that support, or might even appear to endorse8, religion.
As I discuss in an earlier article, courts have developed a number of tests to determine whether the government is coercing9 a religious belief or is somehow getting “excessively entangled” in religion--as is sometimes the case with those Christmas/Hannukah displays that go up around City Hall in December. Judges have even held that government cannot appear to endorse religion in general, as distinct from atheism10.
Does Mandatory11 AA Violate the Constitution?
So where does that leave AA, whose members have committed to “turn our will and lives over to the care of God, as we understood Him,” to quote Step #3 of their 12-step program?
Although the Supreme Court has yet to rule on this question, at least three federal courts of appeal have held that requiring a person to attend Alcoholic1 Anonymous or Narcotics12 Anonymous (NA) violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Do Buddhists14 and Atheists Have to Attend AA?
In 2007 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a parole officer’s demand that a convicted drug offender16 attend Narcotics Anonymous violated the First Amendment rights of the offender, who claimed to be a Buddhist13. Not only that, but the aggrieved17 offender was free to sue the parole officer for damages, even though state officials are often immune from such suits.
The upshot is that parole and probation officers must be very careful when ordering treatment for addicts--they might find themselves on the wrong end of a lawsuit18. Having said that, the damages in such a suit may not be very large. In one case, a New York man who claimed to be an atheist15 sued county probation officials for requiring him to attend AA after his third alcohol-related driving offense19. A federal district judge agreed that the officials had violated the Establishment clause--but ordered them to pay just $1, as “symbolic” damages.
Optional Participation20 in AA is Constitutional
Mind you, in cases like this, the courts found that the government had forced the person to attend AA or NA. In other cases, where state or local officials simply made participation in AA one option for substance abusers, courts have not found any Establishment Clause violation21.
AA is Protected by Religious Confidentiality23
The basic assumption of all these cases--that AA is a religious organization--can affect other areas of the law. For example, under the laws of evidence, religious communications are considered confidential22, much like attorney-client, or doctor-patient communications. In 2001, a federal court overturned the manslaughter conviction of an AA member because the prosecution24 had relied partly on fellow AA members who testified that the defendant25 had confessed his crime at AA meetings. The judge noted26 that if AA is a religion for purposes of the Establishment Clause, then its communications must be treated just as confidentially27 as those in a church.
As far as I know, nobody in these cases has argued that AA is not an effective program. To the contrary, everyone seems to acknowledge the organization’s strong track record. But AA members are required to put their trust in God and the government can’t force them to do that--even though the government does require that our currency say “in God we trust.” Hey, I never promised the law would be logical.
Thank you for reading Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful28 Life.
You can send questions and comments to。。。or call them in to the voicemail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this article only.
1 alcoholic | |
adj.(含)酒精的,由酒精引起的;n.酗酒者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 Alcoholics | |
n.嗜酒者,酒鬼( alcoholic的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 anonymous | |
adj.无名的;匿名的;无特色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 pro | |
n.赞成,赞成的意见,赞成者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 probation | |
n.缓刑(期),(以观后效的)察看;试用(期) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 endorse | |
vt.(支票、汇票等)背书,背署;批注;同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 coercing | |
v.迫使做( coerce的现在分词 );强迫;(以武力、惩罚、威胁等手段)控制;支配 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 atheism | |
n.无神论,不信神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 mandatory | |
adj.命令的;强制的;义务的;n.受托者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 narcotics | |
n.麻醉药( narcotic的名词复数 );毒品;毒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Buddhist | |
adj./n.佛教的,佛教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 Buddhists | |
n.佛教徒( Buddhist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 atheist | |
n.无神论者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 offender | |
n.冒犯者,违反者,犯罪者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 aggrieved | |
adj.愤愤不平的,受委屈的;悲痛的;(在合法权利方面)受侵害的v.令委屈,令苦恼,侵害( aggrieve的过去式);令委屈,令苦恼,侵害( aggrieve的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 offense | |
n.犯规,违法行为;冒犯,得罪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 violation | |
n.违反(行为),违背(行为),侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 confidential | |
adj.秘(机)密的,表示信任的,担任机密工作的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 confidentiality | |
n.秘而不宣,保密 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 prosecution | |
n.起诉,告发,检举,执行,经营 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 defendant | |
n.被告;adj.处于被告地位的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 confidentially | |
ad.秘密地,悄悄地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|