-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
by Michael W. Flynn
First, a disclaimer: Although I am an attorney, the legal information in this podcast is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed1 to practice in your jurisdiction2. Further, I do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.
Today I answer a good basic question from Maryanne from Phoenix3:
I am always reading about injunctions in the news – that some group “got an injunction.” What does it mean to get an injunction? And how does the group get one?
An injunction is an equitable4 remedy that comes in the form of an order by a court. The order will direct a person to do something, or refrain from doing something. A common example is an injunction that orders a person to stop harassing5 another person, by staying a certain number of feet away from the harassed6 person, or that prohibits the harasser7 from contacting his victim.
One major purpose that injunctions serve is to guarantee some remedy where money will not solve the problem. So, imagine that the harasser constantly calls his victim and shouts obscenities and threats. While the victim might later recover monetary8 damages for the distress9, the victim is more interested in stopping the harassment10 and not suffering at all than in suffering and getting paid later. So, the law provides the injunction to give courts the power to stop a person from harassing.
Injunctions come in different shapes and sizes, and different procedures are used to obtain them. A common example is a temporary restraining order that freezes the status quo for a short period of time pending11 the court being able to look at the evidence and determine what should happen. For example, if a person is trying to sell property and transfer title, but another person claims that he has a percentage interest in that property, the court will issue a temporary restraining order to stop the sale until the court can look at all the evidence about who actually owns it and makes a decision.
Permanent injunctions are longer term, but not always actually permanent. A judge might issue a permanent injunction against a company from dumping chemicals into a river after a case where it is determined12 that the company broke the law in dumping.
Most often, to get an injunction before something happens, you have to present pretty good proof. You have to show that, if an injunction is not issued, you will face irreparable harm, or some sort of damage that no later case against the wrongdoer will fully13 fix. Take the property sale example – if the sale happens, then the person who had the percentage ownership cannot ever get that property back. He might get paid for it, but he no longer has that unique piece of land that he holds near and dear for some reason.
You must also present evidence that you are more likely than not to prevail in the upcoming case.
Injunctions are powerful tools because, once issued, the police and other authorities can enforce them. Also, the court can hold someone violating an injunction in criminal or civil contempt, which can carry large fines and imprisonment14.
One hot topic in injunctions today is “gang injunctions.” They are injunctions that order people to refrain from associating with certain other people who are part of criminal organizations. So, if a person is seen speaking to a gang member, then the police can swoop15 in and possibly arrest both people. Rather than having to follow normal Fourth Amendment16 search and seizure17 law, which requires that the police have a reasonable suspicion of some violation18 of the law, the police can simply stop the conversations themselves. These injunctions are hotly contested because it is almost impossible to define who is in a gang, who is not, what activities are allowed, and what are not, and also because they are seen by critics as a violation of innocent bystanders’ Fourth Amendment rights. These injunctions are currently being tested around courts in the country, and time will tell if they stand.
Thank you for listening to Legal Lad’s Quick and Dirty Tips for a More Lawful19 Life. You can send questions and comments to。。。。。。or call them in to the voice mail line at 206-202-4LAW. Please note that doing so will not create an attorney-client relationship and will be used for the purposes of this podcast only.
1 licensed | |
adj.得到许可的v.许可,颁发执照(license的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 phoenix | |
n.凤凰,长生(不死)鸟;引申为重生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 equitable | |
adj.公平的;公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 harassing | |
v.侵扰,骚扰( harass的现在分词 );不断攻击(敌人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 harassed | |
adj. 疲倦的,厌烦的 动词harass的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 harasser | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 monetary | |
adj.货币的,钱的;通货的;金融的;财政的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 distress | |
n.苦恼,痛苦,不舒适;不幸;vt.使悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 harassment | |
n.骚扰,扰乱,烦恼,烦乱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 pending | |
prep.直到,等待…期间;adj.待定的;迫近的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 imprisonment | |
n.关押,监禁,坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 swoop | |
n.俯冲,攫取;v.抓取,突然袭击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 amendment | |
n.改正,修正,改善,修正案 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 seizure | |
n.没收;占有;抵押 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 violation | |
n.违反(行为),违背(行为),侵犯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 lawful | |
adj.法律许可的,守法的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|