-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Choosing A Charity: Should You Go With Your Heart Or Your Head?
play pause stop mute unmute max volume 00:0003:51repeat repeat off Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser1 to a recent version or update your Flash plugin. STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Today is the fifth annual Giving Tuesday, a day when thousands of charities ask us to open our wallets, although that does require some thought. How can you be sure that the group you donate to is effective and that you're getting the most bang for your charity buck2? NPR's Nurith Aizenman reports.
NURITH AIZENMAN, BYLINE3: Some years ago, Elie Hassenfeld and a buddy4 at this hedge fund they both worked at decided5 they wanted to give money to charity. But being numbers guys, they wanted evidence of which groups could offer the biggest impact per dollar.
ELIE HASSENFELD: We were shocked by how little useful information was available.
AIZENMAN: Sure, there are rating sites that let you check how much a charity spends on overhead, any red flags pointing to corruption6.
HASSENFELD: But nothing that said, this is how much a charity can accomplish with the donation that you get.
AIZENMAN: And so, in 2007, Hassenfeld and his friend, whose name is Holden Karnofsky decided to start a nonprofit called GiveWell. The mission - come up with an annual shortlist of charities they can recommend based on scientific evidence.
HASSENFELD: Randomised control trials of, for example, distributing malaria7 nets in Africa to see how effectively that reduces cases of malaria and save lives.
AIZENMAN: Turns out passing out cheap bed nets against malaria-carrying mosquitoes saves a lot of lives. And that puts Against Malaria Foundation at the top of GiveWell's picks for 2016. Their next choice?
OK, I'm looking at number two. Schisto - I think I'm going to mispronounce this.
HASSENFELD: (Laughter). Schistosomiasis - it's an intestinal8 worm.
AIZENMAN: It affects a lot of kids in sub-Saharan Africa, causing cognitive9 and physical development problems. HASSENFELD says Schistosomiasis Control Initiative can deworm a kid for just 50 cents.
HASSENFELD: So a very small amount of money may have really large, long-term effects.
AIZENMAN: The thing is, social science research suggests, if you tell us about one child who needs our help, we're sold. Rattle10 off statistics about an obscure disease in some far-away place, and a lot of us start to feel overwhelmed and, frankly11, turned off. Hassenfeld doesn't disagree, but he says...
HASSENFELD: We're trying to reach a particular type of person who's just thinking about their charitable giving in a very different way.
AIZENMAN: And in just nine years, GiveWell has convinced about 14,000 people to donate a total of more than $100 million to the charities it's selected. Still, at least one of those charities is starting to rethink the database to pitch for donations. It's a fairly new group called GiveDirectly. Ian Bassin manages donor12 relations.
IAN BASSIN: We are asking people to do something that, I think, most people instinctively13, psychologically are resistant14 to.
AIZENMAN: Basically, GiveDirectlly wants to take your cash and just hand it over to an extremely poor person - no strings15 attached. The beneficiary can spend the money however he or she sees fit. Why? Well...
BASSIN: It turns out that rigorous scientific evidence over the last 10 to 15 years has shown that actually giving people the power of choice to decide what their priorities are is one of the most effective ways to help the poor.
AIZENMAN: GiveDirectly was founded by a bunch of economists16 who were inspired by this research. And at first, they wanted to make their case to donors17 just on the numbers. They were determined18 to avoid what Bassin calls poverty porn.
BASSIN: You know, people sort of putting a picture of a starving child on a video and, you know, infomercial.
AIZENMAN: In five years, they've raised more than $130 million. But a few days ago, they unveiled a new feature on their website. It's a running list of photos and profiles of the beneficiaries because now they want to reach a broader audience.
BASSIN: There's a limit to how many sort of of the wonky, evidence-type-based donors that we could have.
AIZENMAN: And often, Bassin says, people's charitable giving is a connection between the head and the heart. Nurith Aizenman, NPR News.
1 browser | |
n.浏览者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 buck | |
n.雄鹿,雄兔;v.马离地跳跃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 buddy | |
n.(美口)密友,伙伴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 corruption | |
n.腐败,堕落,贪污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 malaria | |
n.疟疾 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 intestinal | |
adj.肠的;肠壁;肠道细菌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 cognitive | |
adj.认知的,认识的,有感知的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 rattle | |
v.飞奔,碰响;激怒;n.碰撞声;拨浪鼓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 frankly | |
adv.坦白地,直率地;坦率地说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 donor | |
n.捐献者;赠送人;(组织、器官等的)供体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 instinctively | |
adv.本能地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 resistant | |
adj.(to)抵抗的,有抵抗力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 strings | |
n.弦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|