-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
ARI SHAPIRO, HOST:
The White House's top trade adviser1 is offering a bleak2 and suspicious view of global trade. The head of the president's National Trade Council says foreign firms buying U.S. companies pose a threat to national security. As NPR's Chris Arnold reports, it's a fringe view that puts him at odds3 with the vast majority of economists5.
CHRIS ARNOLD, BYLINE6: This week, White House trade adviser Peter Navarro issued a warning. He said basically bad trade policy is making America less safe today.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
PETER NAVARRO: Today, we do not have a single company in the U.S. that can make flat panel displays for our military aircraft.
ARNOLD: Here's what Navarro's worried about. The U.S. imports more than we sell to the rest of the world. That's called the trade deficit7. And it means that some of our trading partners end up with a lot of cash. They use some of that to invest in the United States. They buy stocks. Sometimes they buy up U.S. companies. Most economists see this though as just part of global trade, which overall benefits all the countries involved. But Navarro has a darker view.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
NAVARRO: Suppose instead that it is not a benign8 ally buying up our companies, our technologies, our farmland and our food supply chain and ultimately controlling much of our defense9 industrial base. Rather, it is a rapidly militarizing strategic rival intent on hegemony in Asia and perhaps world hegemony.
ARNOLD: So in that scenario10, a country like China is going to buy up all of our defense contractors11 and take over the world. That does not sound very good. And then there was this.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
NAVARRO: We have already begun to lose control of our food supply chain.
ARNOLD: OK. Wait a minute. We're losing control of our food supply?
DERMOT HAYES: I was completely confused by that comment. It's an uninformed statement.
ARNOLD: That's Dermot Hayes. He's an agribusiness economist4 in the farm belt at Iowa State University. So he keeps pretty close track of what's going on in the world of agriculture.
Are lots of U.S. companies in the food or agricultural area being bought up by the Chinese or something?
HAYES: There's nothing that's going on that would say that other governments are buying essential portions of our agricultural infrastructure12.
ARNOLD: Hayes says a Chinese company did buy Smithfield Foods a few years ago. It's a big pork producer. But he says that actually was a really good thing.
HAYES: To Iowa and to the Midwest, that's been a great purchase because suddenly our exports to China skyrocketed.
ARNOLD: More jobs, more processing plants. So Hayes says that Navarro just isn't making any sense. In fact, he says the reality is the exact opposite. He says the U.S. is a massive exporter of food. So China, Japan, Mexico, lots of countries rely on us for their food supply. But Hayes says all this anti-trade talk from the Trump13 administration, that's making those countries nervous. Joe Glauber is an economist with the International Food Policy Research Institute.
JOSEPH GLAUBER: It does tend to spook people. And I think that that's the real damage that's being done right now.
ARNOLD: Glauber says he's been speaking with farmers and farm groups in the U.S. And they're worried that other countries are starting to look elsewhere to diversify14 imports for their food supply.
GLAUBER: They get concerned when they read reports that Mexico now is looking for potentially alternative sources of supply for soybeans and corn.
ARNOLD: Getting back to the national security issue, all this is not to say that foreign ownership of companies never creates a problem. Douglas Irwin is a Dartmouth College trade economist.
DOUGLAS IRWIN: All economists say that national security consideration should override15 any adherence16 to free trade. Adam Smith in "The Wealth Of Nations" going way back said defense is more important than opulence17. So economists have always recognized that.
ARNOLD: But Irwin says the government already reviews foreign purchases of companies with military or strategic technology or significance. And it sometimes blocks those purchases. And he says Navarro just didn't provide convincing evidence that there's actually anything to worry about here. Chris Arnold, NPR News.
(SOUNDBITE OF DAVID HOLMES SONG, "STORY OF THE INK")
1 adviser | |
n.劝告者,顾问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 bleak | |
adj.(天气)阴冷的;凄凉的;暗淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 odds | |
n.让步,机率,可能性,比率;胜败优劣之别 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 deficit | |
n.亏空,亏损;赤字,逆差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 benign | |
adj.善良的,慈祥的;良性的,无危险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 contractors | |
n.(建筑、监造中的)承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 infrastructure | |
n.下部构造,下部组织,基础结构,基础设施 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 diversify | |
v.(使)不同,(使)变得多样化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 override | |
vt.不顾,不理睬,否决;压倒,优先于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 adherence | |
n.信奉,依附,坚持,固着 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 opulence | |
n.财富,富裕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|