-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
AILSA CHANG, HOST:
We've been following for a long time now a story about an invention that could save thousands of Americans every year from really serious accidents. Industry has resisted adopting it. And now, regulators in Washington may take steps to force the issue. NPR's Chris Arnold reports.
CHRIS ARNOLD, BYLINE1: Back in 2004, I saw a little ad in the back of a woodworking magazine. It said SawStop, the table saw that won't cut off your fingers. Now, a table saw has a big, jagged metal blade that spins at a hundred miles an hour. And a lot of people get hurt using them. So I called up the company, and I talked to the inventor. His name is Steve Gass. And he had this amazing story to tell.
STEVE GASS: I was just out in my shop one day. And I happened to look over at my table saw and thought, you know, I wonder if you ran your hand under the blade, if you could stop it quick enough that you wouldn't get a serious injury. And it seemed doable.
ARNOLD: There was Gass back then at a woodworking show. Every year, more than 4,000 Americans suffer amputations, get their hands mangled2 using table saws. And Gass figured out a safety brake that could prevent all of those accidents. None of the major power tool companies would buy his invention, so he started his own saw company. He proved that the technology worked.
And he petitioned4 the Consumer Product Safety Commission5, saying, hey, you should require the rest of the industry to make safer saws, too. And yesterday, he was back at the Commission, this time asking, why haven't you done this yet?
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
GASS: You commissioners7 have the power to take one of the most dangerous products ever available to consumers and make it vastly safer. And yet, here we are, over 14 years after this petition3 was initially8 filed, still engaged in a glacial process with an uncertain end.
ARNOLD: Earlier this year, the Safety Commission voted to take a key step towards a new safety rule for table saws. The rule would require the saws to sense when an injury is about to occur and to stop the blade. That's what SawStop does. The hearing yesterday was a chance for industry and the public to weigh in. And Joshua Ward9 from Oregon wanted to be there.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
JOSHUA WARD: In 2013, I was in wood shop class in my high school.
ARNOLD: Ward says, the table saw jerked10 the wood he was cutting. And in an eye blink11, four of his fingers were either cut off or badly mangled. Beyond the surgeries and the pain, Ward says it's limited his life. His dad's a firefighter. He grew up in the firehouse every day.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
WARD: It's kind of been a lifelong dream of mine was to be a firefighter. And this injury has put that to an end. And as we speak, it's about 12:30. Six people have already had fingers amputated today. And there's going to be another 10 tomorrow.
ARNOLD: He urged the CPSC to adopt the new rule. But even after all this time, it's unclear if that will happen. Susan Young, with the industry group the Power Tool Institute, said the proposed rule needs even more study and is missing data.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
SUSAN YOUNG: Lacks essential data from critical studies currently12 being conducted and continuing throughout 2017.
ARNOLD: Some of the commissioners had other concerns. And with uncertainty13 about how to move forward in the air, Commissioner6 Elliot Kaye, who joined the hearing by Skype, said he had a message for Joshua Ward, who was so badly injured in shop class.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
ELLIOT KAYE: Mr. Ward, I want to apologize to you, personally, that we failed you and that we continue to fail the 10 victims per day that you mentioned earlier. We should do better. We can do better.
ARNOLD: For now, the Consumer Product Safety Commission will be analyzing14 public comments. Then, the commission could finally vote on whether to make table saws a whole lot safer. Chris Arnold, NPR News, Washington.
(SOUNDBITE OF TSUNEO IMAHORI'S "BLOOD AND THUNDER")
1 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 mangled | |
vt.乱砍(mangle的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 petition | |
n.请愿书,申请书,诉状;v.请愿,正式请求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 petitioned | |
祈求,请求,请愿( petition的过去式和过去分词 ); (向法庭)请求,申请 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 commission | |
n.委托,授权,委员会,拥金,回扣,委任状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 commissioner | |
n.(政府厅、局、处等部门)专员,长官,委员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 commissioners | |
n.专员( commissioner的名词复数 );长官;委员;政府部门的长官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 initially | |
adv.最初,开始 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 ward | |
n.守卫,监护,病房,行政区,由监护人或法院保护的人(尤指儿童);vt.守护,躲开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 jerked | |
猛拉( jerk的过去式和过去分词 ); (使…)猝然一动[颤动] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 blink | |
vi.眨眼睛,闪烁;vt.眨(眼睛),使闪烁 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 currently | |
adv.通常地,普遍地,当前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 uncertainty | |
n.易变,靠不住,不确知,不确定的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 analyzing | |
v.分析;分析( analyze的现在分词 );分解;解释;对…进行心理分析n.分析 | |
参考例句: |
|
|