-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
RACHEL MARTIN, HOST:
Harvard University goes on trial in Boston today for alleged1 discrimination against Asian-Americans. The group that's suing the school is called Students for Fair Admissions, and it claims the university systematically2 ranks Asian-American applicants3 lower on personality characteristics. Harvard denies this charge. Joining us now, reporter Kirk Carapezza of Boston member station WGBH. He's been following this story closely. Kirk, thanks for being here.
KIRK CARAPEZZA, BYLINE4: Hey. Good morning, Rachel.
MARTIN: So I just gave the broad brush strokes of what the suit is about, but can you get more detailed5? What is the central allegation here?
CARAPEZZA: Sure. The group Students for Fair Admissions, led by conservative legal strategist Edward Blum, is claiming that Harvard caps the number of academically qualified6 Asian-American applicants by using these personal ratings. In court, the group will need to prove that Harvard is intentionally7 rejecting the applicants because they're Asian, because of their race. I spoke8 with attorney Lee Cheng with the Asian American Legal Foundation, which is supporting this lawsuit9. Cheng is Chinese-American, and he's also a Harvard graduate.
LEE CHENG: Harvard is systematically saying that Asian candidates are not likable and don't have good personalities10 by orders of magnitudes less than candidates of any other ethnic11 group, which is really nothing but racist12. It perpetuates13 and feeds and creates stereotypes14.
MARTIN: So just to be clear, Kirk - so Harvard uses this personality rating system for all applicants. It's just that this group is alleging15 that Asian-American applicants are the ones who get dinged most often.
CARAPEZZA: Right, Rachel. They're - the group is claiming that Harvard is using these rankings to racially balance its classes, which is illegal. It's unconstitutional.
MARTIN: So how is Harvard waging a defense16?
CARAPEZZA: Harvard says there's been no discrimination against Asian-American applicants. And it continuously points out that Asian-Americans now account for 23 percent of all admitted students, and they make up just 6 percent of the U.S. population. At a higher education event in Detroit last month, I caught up with Harvard's new president, Larry Bacow, and he defended the college's admissions process.
LARRY BACOW: Nobody wants to be judged on their numbers alone. People understand and recognize that we learn from our differences, that creating a diverse learning environment enriches the learning experience for every student on campus.
CARAPEZZA: And Bacow says what's at stake here is Harvard and higher education's ability to create that diverse environment, which he argues is central to its mission.
MARTIN: The Trump17 administration has come out and weighed in on this. The Department of Justice is backing the plaintiffs. Is going to make a difference?
CARAPEZZA: Right. Last month, the Justice Department filed a brief in support of the lawsuit, saying Harvard's admissions process, quote, "may be infected with racial bias18." Here in Boston, Judge Allison Burroughs will preside over the trial. And she was nominated by President Obama back in 2014. And she's the same judge who blocked President Trump's executive order designed to ban refugees and immigrants from seven predominantly Muslim countries. Judge Burroughs is known for her independent streak19, so I don't think she'll be swayed by the Justice Department or the Trump administration or any other political agenda.
MARTIN: I mean, this is about Harvard, but could this case have an impact on admissions policies at other schools?
CARAPEZZA: Civil rights leaders certainly worry about that. They see this lawsuit as a direct attack on race-conscious admissions, which for the past 40 years the Supreme20 Court has allowed if carefully done. Students for Fair Admissions has explicitly21 said their goal is to overturn that precedent22. And they want selective schools like Harvard to stop considering race altogether.
MARTIN: Reporter Kirk Carapezza from WGBH in Boston, thanks so much.
CARAPEZZA: Thanks, Rachel.
1 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 systematically | |
adv.有系统地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 applicants | |
申请人,求职人( applicant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 qualified | |
adj.合格的,有资格的,胜任的,有限制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 intentionally | |
ad.故意地,有意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 lawsuit | |
n.诉讼,控诉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 personalities | |
n. 诽谤,(对某人容貌、性格等所进行的)人身攻击; 人身攻击;人格, 个性, 名人( personality的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 ethnic | |
adj.人种的,种族的,异教徒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 racist | |
n.种族主义者,种族主义分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 perpetuates | |
n.使永存,使人记住不忘( perpetuate的名词复数 );使永久化,使持久化,使持续 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 stereotypes | |
n.老套,模式化的见解,有老一套固定想法的人( stereotype的名词复数 )v.把…模式化,使成陈规( stereotype的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 alleging | |
断言,宣称,辩解( allege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 bias | |
n.偏见,偏心,偏袒;vt.使有偏见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 streak | |
n.条理,斑纹,倾向,少许,痕迹;v.加条纹,变成条纹,奔驰,快速移动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 explicitly | |
ad.明确地,显然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 precedent | |
n.先例,前例;惯例;adj.在前的,在先的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|