-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
How does it affect your life when your boss takes a political stand? Many people are finding out. The CEO of Nike, Mark Parker, approved an ad campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, the NFL quarterback who protested police shootings of black men. Ed Stack, the CEO of Dick's Sporting Goods, pulled assault-style weapons from store shelves. Those are statements directed at consumers but that also influenced the way employees feel about their jobs. NPR's Yuki Noguchi reports.
YUKI NOGUCHI, BYLINE1: When Levi Strauss CEO Chip Bergh made a corporate2 donation of a million dollars toward preventing gun violence last month, he anticipated an impassioned response.
CHIP BERGH: I knew I was going to get a lot of hate mail. I knew I was going to get threats. I knew my family was going to get threats. And all that has happened. But somebody's got to have the courage to step up and say something needs to be done.
NOGUCHI: Some of those emails came from his own employees, who interpreted the move as hostile to gun ownership. He also received support from Levi's employees whose children had been in lockdowns at school because of active shooters.
BERGH: They may not always agree with every single position or stand that we're taking, but they appreciate the fact that we are willing to dive into these tough issues.
NOGUCHI: Bergh says activism from supporting desegregation to LGBT rights has long been part of the California-based company's history. He says in today's hyperpartisan environment, employees want to know where their leaders stand. And strong values are increasingly part of what job candidates look for in an employer.
BERGH: If you're in HR or finance or marketing4, you can go work anywhere in San Francisco today. We have very intense loyalty5 to this company. And a big part of the reason we've got that kind of loyalty is this is part of our value proposition.
NOGUCHI: Aaron Chatterji is a professor of business and public policy at Duke University. He traces modern CEO activism to 2014 when Apple CEO Tim Cook publicly supported gay rights and Starbucks then-CEO Howard Schultz wrote an open letter about race that intensified6 with the election of Donald Trump7.
AARON CHATTERJI: What's changed now is we're more polarized as a society. And it's much more difficult to occupy that middle ground without being drawn8 into the fight.
NOGUCHI: Fights that often play out very publicly. Chatterji says social media amplifies9 the voices of people who are most passionate10 about their loyalties11 whether it's to a political party, a news source or a brand. And it's changed business norms by allowing workers and customers to speak directly to CEOs. He says companies that recognize this play up their values to appeal to their core customers just as political parties do for their base.
CHATTERJI: A lot of people say, look; it doesn't make sense from a capitalist point of view or a market point of view to get involved in politics. And I think that's actually missing the point.
NOGUCHI: Corporate identities, in other words, are becoming more partisan3.
MELISSA HARRIS: I think increasingly you're going to see blue brands and red brands.
NOGUCHI: Melissa Harris runs her own marketing agency in Chicago. She says companies are always competing for more attention.
HARRIS: They come to us asking for language that is more provocative12, almost controversial. They want these messages to travel farther.
NOGUCHI: Of course many CEOs prefer to avoid politics and controversy13 altogether. But it can be harder to remain neutral. Experts say staying silent comes with its own downsides because a CEO's position can influence recruitment and retention14, especially among younger workers. Leslie Gaines-Ross is chief reputation strategist at the public relations firm Weber Shandwick. She says a recent survey showed nearly a third of employees say they feel more engaged and loyal because they agree with their CEO's stances. But it can have the opposite effect among those who disagree.
LESLIE GAINES-ROSS: So I think it's a double-edged sword. And that's probably the hardest part of it, is that there is no playbook anymore for taking a stand.
NOGUCHI: She says today CEOs are navigating15 choppy waters. It's hard to remain silent on issues, yet there are risks and benefits to speaking out. Yuki Noguchi, NPR News, Washington.
1 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 partisan | |
adj.党派性的;游击队的;n.游击队员;党徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 marketing | |
n.行销,在市场的买卖,买东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 loyalty | |
n.忠诚,忠心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 intensified | |
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 trump | |
n.王牌,法宝;v.打出王牌,吹喇叭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 amplifies | |
放大,扩大( amplify的第三人称单数 ); 增强; 详述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 passionate | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,激昂的,易动情的,易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 loyalties | |
n.忠诚( loyalty的名词复数 );忠心;忠于…感情;要忠于…的强烈感情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 provocative | |
adj.挑衅的,煽动的,刺激的,挑逗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 retention | |
n.保留,保持,保持力,记忆力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 navigating | |
v.给(船舶、飞机等)引航,导航( navigate的现在分词 );(从海上、空中等)横越;横渡;飞跃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|