-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:
In Europe, if you find a webpage about you and you don't like it either because it says something not true or because it's too personal, you can make Google hide it from the search results. It is the law. Google has done this with more than a million pages. Now, here in the U.S., even in the most blatant1 cases the law does not protect people this way. Here's NPR's Aarti Shahani reporting for our series on speech in the digital age.
AARTI SHAHANI, BYLINE2: When Wall Street investor3 Jeff Ervine searched his name on Google in 2010, the first result was a website called Con4 v. Con.
JEFF ERVINE: And I clicked on it. And it went to a picture of my wife and I.
SHAHANI: He was in a tuxedo5, she in an evening gown. They looked rich.
ERVINE: And I clicked on it again.
SHAHANI: And the site said Ervine, who'd managed billions of dollars, was in fact a con artist who tried to trick a know-nothing kid into a sweetheart deal.
ERVINE: It was very dark and sociopathic in nature in terms of what he was writing.
SHAHANI: He, the author of the website, was a 26-year-old who hated Ervine because Ervine helped put him behind bars.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: How Hakan Yalincak got to this point in his life is a story of a brilliant college kid.
SHAHANI: That's CNBC reporting on Hakan Yalincak in 2007. Yalincak was a New York University student swindling investors6 out of millions of dollars. He got caught. Ervine helped do it. In this interview on the eve of Yalincak's 42-month sentence, he sounded remorseful7.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
HAKAN YALINCAK: I didn't need to be so ambitious, be so greedy. And now for the rest of my life, no matter what I accomplish, this will always be there.
SHAHANI: But it turns out the young man was terribly vindictive8. After serving his time and getting deported9 to Turkey, he made sure Ervine would pay by publishing that website, Con v. Con, which was full of lies. At first, Ervine shrugged10 it off. But then prospective11 clients and partners kept bringing it up.
ERVINE: And I would go into meetings, and I'd spend the first 15 minutes explaining this story.
SHAHANI: It was after the financial crisis, after the Bernie Madoff scandal. Not a great time to try to explain yourself.
ERVINE: Because even if it wasn't true, and - no one would take a career risk.
SHAHANI: Ervine knew he couldn't talk any sense into his attacker. But he assumed he could get Google on his side. He had his lawyers fax and mail a letter to Google's chief counsel with a simple request - please stop highlighting this one site. Google ignored the request. Ervine was shocked.
ERVINE: You are helpless. And you're hopeless. And what can you do? It's like slut shaming or anything else that goes on on the Internet today.
SHAHANI: Google holds the position that in the U.S., it's not obligated to remove defamatory content, lies from search results. It'll consider doing so as a matter of discretion12 if there is a court finding. So Ervine's lawyers ran into court and sued. It took more than a year to establish jurisdiction13, to serve the papers overseas and to win. The final court hearing is extraordinary. Judge James F. Holderman, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, he apologized to Ervine on behalf of the American justice system. He said, quote, "you in my opinion have done everything right. You have been a model citizen. You have assisted your government in exposing and prosecuting14 fraud on other people. And then you are victimized. I wish I could do more," end quote. For Ervine, winning didn't feel like victory.
ERVINE: I had to have my lawyers write to Google with the judgment15 saying, we have obtained the judgment that this is false and defamatory. We'd like you to take it down. And then...
SHAHANI: And then it takes a few months for Google to respond that, yes, they'd help, and then another month to actually do it. Only the help felt a bit like a slap in the face because Google decided16 to add a disclaimer in alarming red letters that Jeff Ervine's search results have been altered. It looked like he had something to hide, not like Google had made the mistake of highlighting fake news.
ERVINE: There's no humanity or kindness in Google. There's none. It's not about anyone else. It's all about Google.
SHAHANI: NPR submitted to Google a summary of Ervine's case and asked what happened. A spokesperson says, I'm not really sure why it took a while to respond, and we don't comment on individual cases. Jeff Ervine says his reputation was damaged, and it hurt his career. Today he's building a tech company called Bridg-it to protect people like him, others attacked online. He doesn't want anyone else to pay like he did. All told, Ervine spent about a hundred thousand dollars in legal fees. In Europe he would have just filled out a form. Aarti Shahani, NPR News, San Francisco.
1 blatant | |
adj.厚颜无耻的;显眼的;炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 byline | |
n.署名;v.署名 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 investor | |
n.投资者,投资人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 con | |
n.反对的观点,反对者,反对票,肺病;vt.精读,学习,默记;adv.反对地,从反面;adj.欺诈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 tuxedo | |
n.礼服,无尾礼服 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 investors | |
n.投资者,出资者( investor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 remorseful | |
adj.悔恨的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 vindictive | |
adj.有报仇心的,怀恨的,惩罚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 deported | |
v.将…驱逐出境( deport的过去式和过去分词 );举止 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 shrugged | |
vt.耸肩(shrug的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 prospective | |
adj.预期的,未来的,前瞻性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 discretion | |
n.谨慎;随意处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 prosecuting | |
检举、告发某人( prosecute的现在分词 ); 对某人提起公诉; 继续从事(某事物); 担任控方律师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|