英语 英语 日语 日语 韩语 韩语 法语 法语 德语 德语 西班牙语 西班牙语 意大利语 意大利语 阿拉伯语 阿拉伯语 葡萄牙语 葡萄牙语 越南语 越南语 俄语 俄语 芬兰语 芬兰语 泰语 泰语 泰语 丹麦语 泰语 对外汉语

美国国家公共电台 NPR Most Americans Feel They've Lost Control Of Their Online Data

时间:2018-04-19 01:49来源:互联网 提供网友:nan   字体: [ ]
特别声明:本栏目内容均从网络收集或者网友提供,供仅参考试用,我们无法保证内容完整和正确。如果资料损害了您的权益,请与站长联系,我们将及时删除并致以歉意。
    (单词翻译:双击或拖选)

 

MARY LOUISE KELLY, HOST:

As Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg testified for Congress today, we sat wondering, how much do Americans care about their online privacy? What's OK for companies to collect about you, and what's not? So we went out here in Washington, D.C., and asked.

MICHAEL WATSON: Things like purchasing preferences probably seem OK. But anything of a personal nature I would think should be off-limits.

ASHLEY WILLIAMS: Of course Social Securities and bank information, all that - that's a little bit more private.

WATSON: I think I have some control. But I tend to trust the companies to protect me a little bit.

WILLIAMS: To me, the whole them knowing what I like - you know, the ads and stuff...

MELANIE FINE: When you, like, search something and then you go on Facebook and there's an ad for it, that's really creepy.

WILLIAMS: ...To me that's not that big of a deal. That's fine. Whatever.

FINE: I mean, in a perfect world they wouldn't use anything that I didn't specifically tell them, sure, here's some information about me. But we don't really live in that world.

KELLY: That's Melanie Fine (ph) along with Michael Watson (ph) and Ashley Williams (ph). For a broader view we turned to Lee Rainie. He directs Internet and technology research at Pew. And he's been polling Americans on these issues for years. He told us the picture that the data paints is complicated.

LEE RAINIE: Americans are all over the place when it comes to privacy. The most fundamental level, when you ask them the straight-on question, do you care about it or not, they do care. When you then talk to them about specific tradeoffs, they're a little bit more in a transactional frame of mind. I'm going to give up a little bit of personal information. What am I going to get in return? But the one thing I think that's predominant in our data now is that Americans are confused about what's happening. They don't exactly know what's being collected. They don't know what's being done with it once the data are collected. And they're totally freaked out about the number of data breaches1 that have occurred.

KELLY: So it sounds like Americans are not feeling in control of their online data.

RAINIE: Exactly. Three-quarters of Americans say that control matters a lot to them, but 91 percent of Americans say that they feel that all Americans have lost control of their data and don't really know what they would do to recapture some of that control.

KELLY: Well, let's drill down on some of the specifics. What type of data were people just fine with having shared, and what seems to cross a line?

RAINIE: So their basic purchasing habits - they are not very worried about them being captured and used. The cultural tastes they have, even their political views and religious views don't register very high on things that they consider sensitive. They are very concerned about their Social Security numbers, their health information, the content of private communications - what's going on in their email and texts like that. So not all information is created equal for people, and not all people share the same sort of boundary lines.

KELLY: What about generational differences? Did you find that, say, millennials are more blase2 about their online privacy than the baby boomers?

RAINIE: There's a really interesting generational story that isn't quite what the stereotype3 would have it. Yes, younger people are much more active online, much more forgiving of some of the circumstances when their data are captured and used in some ways to deliver products and services to them. But they're also more vigilant4 than their elders in monitoring. They watch what's posted about them. They watch what pictures their name is tagged in. And they're very concerned about the way that they present themselves online. So they curate their identity and their reputation very aggressively.

KELLY: Mark Zuckerberg, as we mentioned, he's before Congress today. He'll be back there tomorrow. Lots of questions about the role that regulation could play in preserving people's privacy. Do you have any advice to lawmakers based from your research as lawmakers think about where to draw the line and how to police a company like Facebook?

RAINIE: One of the reasons we intensively studied privacy since 2013 and the first revelations by Edward Snowden about government surveillance was that we wanted to see for ourselves what the bright lines were that Americans would draw because we knew that both companies and the government would love to have some guidance about where the bright lines are. And the maddeningly complicated thing about this process is that different Americans draw their lines at different places. Contexts and the specific conditions under which people share their information matters a lot. And their time of life matters a lot. The bargain that they're being offered matters a lot. So there aren't very pronouncedly clear bright lines for all Americans in all ways.

KELLY: You're kind of saying as Congress seeks to fix this, it's not quite clear what this is. Different people define this problem really differently.

RAINIE: Yes, there are certain broad tendencies. And I think Americans would very clearly love a lot more transparency, a lot more control over their data, a lot more information about when problems occur. But there are still great variances5 even on those questions. So it would be hard for anybody wanting to regulate in this space to sort of say, OK, these are the absolute moments when all Americans would be happy with regulation, and these are the moments when people would be happy with the companies being in control of things. It's a much more fluid kind of situation that depends on people in their own individual circumstances.

KELLY: That's Lee Rainie, director of Internet and technology research at Pew. Thanks so much for talking to us today.

RAINIE: Thanks, Mary Louise.


点击收听单词发音收听单词发音  

1 breaches f7e9a03d0b1fa3eeb94ac8e8ffbb509a     
破坏( breach的名词复数 ); 破裂; 缺口; 违背
参考例句:
  • He imposed heavy penalties for breaches of oath or pledges. 他对违反誓言和保证的行为给予严厉的惩罚。
  • This renders all breaches of morality before marriage very uncommon. 这样一来,婚前败坏道德的事就少见了。
2 blase 6xszu1     
adj.厌烦于享乐的
参考例句:
  • She's very blase about parties.她非常腻烦聚会。
  • The film star is blase about endless flattery now.那位电影明星现在对无休无止的吹捧已经厌烦了。
3 stereotype rupwE     
n.固定的形象,陈规,老套,旧框框
参考例句:
  • He's my stereotype of a schoolteacher.他是我心目中的典型教师。
  • There's always been a stereotype about successful businessmen.人们对于成功商人一直都有一种固定印象。
4 vigilant ULez2     
adj.警觉的,警戒的,警惕的
参考例句:
  • He has to learn how to remain vigilant through these long nights.他得学会如何在这漫长的黑夜里保持警觉。
  • The dog kept a vigilant guard over the house.这只狗警醒地守护着这所房屋。
5 variances bd0d87f6247cbecf52a8b6f77dcb36f1     
n.变化( variance的名词复数 );不和;差异;方差
参考例句:
  • a note with subtle variances of pitch 音高有细微变化的音符
  • That subsection allows variances based on water quality considerations. 那条细目基于对水质的考虑,允许有差异。 来自英汉非文学 - 环境法 - 环境法
本文本内容来源于互联网抓取和网友提交,仅供参考,部分栏目没有内容,如果您有更合适的内容,欢迎点击提交分享给大家。
------分隔线----------------------------
TAG标签:   NPR  美国国家电台  英语听力
顶一下
(0)
0%
踩一下
(0)
0%
最新评论 查看所有评论
发表评论 查看所有评论
请自觉遵守互联网相关的政策法规,严禁发布色情、暴力、反动的言论。
评价:
表情:
验证码:
听力搜索
推荐频道
论坛新贴