-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
MICHEL MARTIN, HOST:
If you think Russia's influence in the last presidential election began in 2016, a new book argues that's wrong. In Blowout, journalist Rachel Maddow - yes, that Rachel Maddow, the MSNBC host - traces the rise of oil as a powerful, destructive and lucrative1 industry to the Russian interference in the last presidential election. One of the ties that binds2 it all together is Vladimir Putin. The oil industry generated tons of money for Russia, and Putin used this money to support his vision of making Russia a superpower again, exerting his influence in the region and around the world. Maddow argues he's been playing the long game, and the 2016 election interference, the trolls, the bots, all of it is just one aspect of it.
There are a lot of dots to connect in this story, and here to do that is Rachel Maddow. She's the author of "Blowout: Corrupted3 Democracy, Rogue4 State Russia, And The Richest, Most Destructive Industry On Earth." And she's with us now from our bureau in New York. Welcome. Thank you so much for joining us.
RACHEL MADDOW: Thank you so much for having me. I'm really happy to be here.
MARTIN: So, you know, you bring together a lot of different topics here, and it isn't really just Russia. I do have to say that one of the things that this book does is - you say it yourself - it stitches together - I'm reading here - it says it's a thread that wraps its way around the globe from Oklahoma and Texas and Washington, D.C., to London, Kyiv, Siberia, Moscow, Equatorial Guinea, the Alaskan Arctic and to a trove5 of Michael Jackson memorabilia, a luxury hotel in Central London, a divorce court in Oklahoma City, a crappy office building offering its workers a free power supply in St. Petersburg, Russia. There's a throughline here, and the throughline is oil.
MADDOW: Yeah. And I did not set out to write a book about oil and gas. I didn't set out to write a book at all, but I was very curious. I found myself putting a lot of focus on my show on what Russia did in 2016. I was really stuck in terms of trying to figure out their motive6 force, not just for why they would want to influence our election but for why they would try to do it in that way, why they would throw that kind of very innovative7, MacGyver kind of wild punch at us.
And I ended up getting to this issue of oil and gas, and it surprised me as much as I think it might surprise anybody. But I do think that the Russian economy being a mess and being totally dependent on oil and gas does explain some of Russia's weakness. And some of Russia's weakness explains why they attacked us in the way they did.
MARTIN: So the beginning kind of nugget of this is that you're trying to understand what Russia's motivation would be. And what you see is that they want to use oil and gas as a tool for expressing kind of global power. But your thesis says it's larger than that. I mean, your thesis is that Russia, like a number of other countries, is basically the victim of a resource curse, right? Would you talk about what that means?
MADDOW: Sure. The basic idea is that if, in your country, you've got natural resources, that somebody is going to pay to come into your country and extract and then sell on the international market. That seems like something that ought to economically benefit your country. You will get new revenue from the extraction and sale of your natural resources. But what we see over and over again is that selling off your natural resources in the commodities market tends to kind of ruin your country. It tends to leave you worse off, even economically worse off. And that's because it has a warping8 effect on your economy.
It's hard to have a diversified9, stable economy when you've got one resource that's pulling in such a big revenue stream. And when you've got one resource that's pulling in such a big revenue stream, you tend to end up with very rich elites10 who will do anything to hold onto power, who stop doing the other things that governments should otherwise be doing to serve the needs of the people.
MARTIN: OK. So what does this have to do with Michael Jackson's glove?
MADDOW: (Laughter) Well, it's both a sad and all areas side story in this. The government in Equatorial Guinea got all these oil revenues. And they basically decided11 to turn the president of the country and his son into some of the richest and most ostentatiously, flagrantly tacky people on the globe while the people of that country suffered and got poorer.
And the son of the president of Equatorial Guinea amassed12 one of the world's great supercar collections and amassed mansions13 in the most flamboyant14 places in the world and put together a really spectacular collection of Michael Jackson memorabilia, all on oil revenue money that was essentially15 looted from the treasury16 of his country.
MARTIN: Meanwhile, people in his country, his - most of the citizens are living on - what? - pennies a day.
MADDOW: Yeah.
MARTIN: And people are still as poor, as sick and as under-nourished and under-educated as they were - what? - 20 years ago.
MADDOW: Yeah, and getting worse. Actually, as the oil revenues flooded in Equatorial Guinea, the government in terms of serving the needs of the people of that country got worse. And you saw everything get worse. You saw the poverty rate get worse. You saw the education system get worse. You even saw the vaccination17 rates go down just because that stream of oil revenue so captured the elites of that country that that became all they did was fighting to stay in power, to keep their clamp on that stream of revenue. And that just happens over and over again all over the world.
MARTIN: What about the United States, though? I mean, is there a way in which this is playing out here? Because one of the things that you argue is that these industries throw off so much money that it becomes relatively18 easy to buy off the elites who benefit from it because it's in the interest of these companies to maintain stable governments. And, you know, sad to say, stability and autocracy19 often go hand in hand. OK. But what about in the United States?
MADDOW: Well, I think the United States and sort of we the people of the United States have the key role in the whole world to play in this because the Western oil majors - not all of them but most of the important ones - are U.S. companies. And even if they're not U.S. companies, they need to operate within the United States, which is a rule of law country, which has the opportunity to regulate them if we so choose.
And so I think the most important way that we function in this is that if our government chose to make oil and gas companies better international and better corporate20 citizens, it would have a knock-on effect all over the world in terms of this industry being able to prop21 up despotic regimes and sort of malignant22 bad actors around the world. We have the power to fix this if we demand that our representatives do this.
MARTIN: You say in the afterword to the book that you're never going to do this again. I take it just because, you know, writing a book while hosting a daily program, which you've been doing since - what? - August of 2008 is not easy.
MADDOW: Yeah.
MARTIN: You obviously have a sense of mission about it. What are you hoping to accomplish with this book?
MADDOW: I am hoping to convince myself to never do it again...
(LAUGHTER)
MADDOW: ...To remind myself that I do have a full-time23 job. And I don't actually have the bandwidth and the physical stamina24 to do a whole extra thing. But this thesis did compel me. And I do, you know, it's a deep look at this. And it's a book-length treatise25 of this. And the only reason I did that is because I felt like the argument here is sort of too long to put on TV. It takes a couple hundred pages to tell it. But, you know, this isn't an activist26 book. It's not a call to action. It's essentially a call to be conscious of this.
And I do think, to look at our situation in the country broadly right now, there is a growing awareness27 that we need to think about bolstering28 our democracy. I think democracy is in decline globally, and it is under pressure both here and around the world. And what I'd like to contribute to that very sober realization29 we're having right now is a realization that regulating big corrosive30 industries that undermine our democratic processes is part of standing31 up and bolstering our democracies, that we do actually need to rein32 in some of these guys.
MARTIN: That's Rachel Maddow. She's the author most recently of "Blowout: Corrupted Democracy, Rogue State Russia, And The Richest, Most Destructive Industry On Earth." And she's also, in her spare time, she's the host of the Emmy Award-winning "Rachel Maddow Show" on MSNBC. Thanks so much for talking to us today.
MADDOW: Michel, thank you so much.
1 lucrative | |
adj.赚钱的,可获利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 binds | |
v.约束( bind的第三人称单数 );装订;捆绑;(用长布条)缠绕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 corrupted | |
(使)败坏( corrupt的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)腐化; 引起(计算机文件等的)错误; 破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 rogue | |
n.流氓;v.游手好闲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 trove | |
n.被发现的东西,收藏的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 motive | |
n.动机,目的;adv.发动的,运动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 innovative | |
adj.革新的,新颖的,富有革新精神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 warping | |
n.翘面,扭曲,变形v.弄弯,变歪( warp的现在分词 );使(行为等)不合情理,使乖戾, | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 diversified | |
adj.多样化的,多种经营的v.使多样化,多样化( diversify的过去式和过去分词 );进入新的商业领域 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 elites | |
精华( elite的名词复数 ); 精锐; 上层集团; (统称)掌权人物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 amassed | |
v.积累,积聚( amass的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 mansions | |
n.宅第,公馆,大厦( mansion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 flamboyant | |
adj.火焰般的,华丽的,炫耀的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 treasury | |
n.宝库;国库,金库;文库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 vaccination | |
n.接种疫苗,种痘 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 relatively | |
adv.比较...地,相对地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 autocracy | |
n.独裁政治,独裁政府 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 corporate | |
adj.共同的,全体的;公司的,企业的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 prop | |
vt.支撑;n.支柱,支撑物;支持者,靠山 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 malignant | |
adj.恶性的,致命的;恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 full-time | |
adj.满工作日的或工作周的,全时间的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 stamina | |
n.体力;精力;耐力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 activist | |
n.活动分子,积极分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 awareness | |
n.意识,觉悟,懂事,明智 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 bolstering | |
v.支持( bolster的现在分词 );支撑;给予必要的支持;援助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 realization | |
n.实现;认识到,深刻了解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 corrosive | |
adj.腐蚀性的;有害的;恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 rein | |
n.疆绳,统治,支配;vt.以僵绳控制,统治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|