-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
This was the company that merged1 with Daimler about 9 years ago hasn't been awfully2 successful. The company paid more than 30 billion dollars back, then, this deal was for 7. 4 billion dollars for 80% of the company. In effect, Chrysler is coming home the name will change, Daimler Chrysler will change back to Daimler AG and, and there is some sense that savings3 can be achieved and Chrysler can get back on a road to health. Here in the United States, even the unions are supporting this deal, there have been a number of suitors about two months ago on Valentine's Day. Daimler Chrysler had announced it was, it was looking for a buyer for Chrysler. This deal has been done. It's the first time a deal of this size has been done, where a private equity4 firm, a firm that doesn't have to report to shareholders5 in any public way is taking over something as major as a, as a big car company like this. But there are some sense as the sunrises here in O'BRIEN. This might actually be a new future for Chrysler. Chrysler is a company that is still heavily dependent on its truck unit and while it hasn't done as badly overtime6 as the other Detroit-based automakers. The delayed response in, in layoffs7 that were announced earlier this year indicated that Chrysler is in trouble. It's bleeding money and needs to have a better outcome. Unclear yet, how it's going to change the CEO and president Tom LaSorda under this agreement is staying on at least for some time and there're no further job cuts. 13, 000 job cuts were announced earlier this year. But the sense around here is that this new leadership at Chrysler might be what it needs to turn it around. Chrysler is coming home to the United States again. Daimler Chrysler will become Daimler and this will become Chrysler Holdings Corporation. Todd.
Ali, as we are all aware, you know, private equity firms, they don't tend to take a long-term view, they're trying restructure and then sell it on to somebody else. Er, there is a lot of fear you know, you say, the union's welcomed this because of their erratic8 past. There is a lot of fear about a belt-tightening and what that mean, might mean for jobs. You know my question is you know, my question is what can they do that hasn't been done because you know, you have a structural9 problem here in the sense that the Japanese automakers are just that much more efficient. In this sense, they have the cars that, that Americans want, so why does this private equity firm think they can accomplish but Chrysler hasn't been able to accomplish?
Yeah, you perfect question there, there are three things that the Japanese automakers have: One, is they got the cars that Americans are buying; Two, is they don't have those legacy10 costs, the health-care costs that the US automakers are saddled with in Chrysler's case about 19 billion dollars worth of liability. And they have a price advantage because there are not unionized staffs, they, by depending on how you calculate it, it could be 30 bucks11 an hour as a price advantage. How. . . where do these savings come from, it's unclear. In Tom LaSorda's words the present CEO of Chrysler he says Chrysler will be better positioned to focus on its long-term plan for recovery rather than just short term result. Ironically what he means is that the short term result that shareholders look at, the quarterly results that haven't been showing from Chrysler. They are thinking Cerberus is going to be able to take a longer term view of that. You're right. These private equity firms aren't looking for the longest term view where they may be able to take something more than a quarterly view, allowing them to turn this around. This is what these private equity firms do as you said, they buy this company, they turn them around and they get rid of it. There is no sense that the private equity firms are looking to be in the car business for any long period of time.
Ali, as we are all aware, you know, private equity firms, they don't tend to take a long-term view, they're trying restructure and then sell it on to somebody else. Er, there is a lot of fear you know, you say, the union's welcomed this because of their erratic8 past. There is a lot of fear about a belt-tightening and what that mean, might mean for jobs. You know my question is you know, my question is what can they do that hasn't been done because you know, you have a structural9 problem here in the sense that the Japanese automakers are just that much more efficient. In this sense, they have the cars that, that Americans want, so why does this private equity firm think they can accomplish but Chrysler hasn't been able to accomplish?
Yeah, you perfect question there, there are three things that the Japanese automakers have: One, is they got the cars that Americans are buying; Two, is they don't have those legacy10 costs, the health-care costs that the US automakers are saddled with in Chrysler's case about 19 billion dollars worth of liability. And they have a price advantage because there are not unionized staffs, they, by depending on how you calculate it, it could be 30 bucks11 an hour as a price advantage. How. . . where do these savings come from, it's unclear. In Tom LaSorda's words the present CEO of Chrysler he says Chrysler will be better positioned to focus on its long-term plan for recovery rather than just short term result. Ironically what he means is that the short term result that shareholders look at, the quarterly results that haven't been showing from Chrysler. They are thinking Cerberus is going to be able to take a longer term view of that. You're right. These private equity firms aren't looking for the longest term view where they may be able to take something more than a quarterly view, allowing them to turn this around. This is what these private equity firms do as you said, they buy this company, they turn them around and they get rid of it. There is no sense that the private equity firms are looking to be in the car business for any long period of time.
点击收听单词发音
1 merged | |
(使)混合( merge的过去式和过去分词 ); 相融; 融入; 渐渐消失在某物中 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 awfully | |
adv.可怕地,非常地,极端地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 savings | |
n.存款,储蓄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 equity | |
n.公正,公平,(无固定利息的)股票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 shareholders | |
n.股东( shareholder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 overtime | |
adj.超时的,加班的;adv.加班地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 layoffs | |
临时解雇( layoff的名词复数 ); 停工,停止活动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 erratic | |
adj.古怪的,反复无常的,不稳定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 structural | |
adj.构造的,组织的,建筑(用)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 bucks | |
n.雄鹿( buck的名词复数 );钱;(英国十九世纪初的)花花公子;(用于某些表达方式)责任v.(马等)猛然弓背跃起( buck的第三人称单数 );抵制;猛然震荡;马等尥起后蹄跳跃 | |
参考例句: |
|
|