-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
The battle to take over the London 2012 stadium has been as fierce and vocal1 as pretty much any which will take place in it. Whoever wins this particular race will determine how this venue2 will look in the decades to come, and just as importantly who among us will get to enjoy it. West Ham would keep the running track and use the venue for athletics3, football, cricket and concerts. Tottenham Hotspur would demolish4 much of the half a billion pounds of structure and rebuild the 60,000-seater stadium in its place, specifically for football. Two very different bids, getting the decision right is crucial.
There is so much of the aftermaths of many Olympic Games, has been marred5 by empty stadium, unused facilities, lots of public money appearing to have been wasted. We are not going to do that. We planned legacy6 into our Olympic park right from the start. It’s one of the reasons that we won.
While there’s been a lot of passionate7 discussion about the merits of each of the bids, the fact is they are both very strong. Spur is seemed to be the signed financial option, but they promised to deliver a legacy to helping8 regenerate9 the local area and investing in a national center for athletics at Crystal Palace. West Ham is considered to be the obvious legacy choice, but they say their finances are signed and calculations are based on the worst case scenarios10. So even the club is relegated11 to the championship, they are still able to pay the bills. Here, meaning crucially, you and I won’t have to.
That’s not to say there hasn’t been one overall favorite in this competition. As well as being the local club, West Ham has most of their supporters and the athletics community on board. Something that spurs fans say shouldn't be a factor.
Why should Tottenham win it is because Tottenham's bid really makes more sense, and it’s much better commercially, and better for the tax payer, and better for the Olympic park a long term. Tottenham would become a great anchor, attraction if you like, for what would become a great place, a great experience place to go. The West Ham proposal, with the greatest respect to them, is flawed.
It is truly that the governments and the London mayor can still decline today’s recommendation for the stadium and it will a number of weeks of negotiating with the preferred partner until anything is signed. Whoever takes the lead today though or had a head start; that will be almost impossible to catch.
Orla Chennaoui, Sky News at the Olympic and Paralympic stadium in East London.
1 vocal | |
adj.直言不讳的;嗓音的;n.[pl.]声乐节目 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 venue | |
n.犯罪地点,审判地,管辖地,发生地点,集合地点 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 athletics | |
n.运动,体育,田径运动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 demolish | |
v.拆毁(建筑物等),推翻(计划、制度等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 marred | |
adj. 被损毁, 污损的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 passionate | |
adj.热情的,热烈的,激昂的,易动情的,易怒的,性情暴躁的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 regenerate | |
vt.使恢复,使新生;vi.恢复,再生;adj.恢复的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 scenarios | |
n.[意]情节;剧本;事态;脚本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 relegated | |
v.使降级( relegate的过去式和过去分词 );使降职;转移;把…归类 | |
参考例句: |
|
|