-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Now for more on the topic, we are joined in the studio by my colleague Wu Haojun.
Q1: Certainly some very appalling1 cases we've seen there, now what exactly is the proposed "underage intervention2 mechanism3" and how does it intend to protect vulnerable children?
Wu: Yes. It’s exactly the shocking incidents we’ve just seen in the story that the new underage intervention mechanism will endeavour to prevent from happening. In fact, there’s no lack of child protection related laws in the country. China’s 1991 Child Protection Law, 1987 Civil Law and other relevant bylaws define the deprivation4 of parental5 custody6, but there are no specifics on how to implement7 these laws. For example, the current law has failed to specify8 who can sue when a child is abused by their parents. According to Chinese law, "relevant individuals or institutions" can appeal to the courts when a child is abused by their legal guardian9, but the law doesn’t further define "relevant individuals or institutions".And it’s especially unclear about which department is responsible for caring for children if parental custody is removed, and what precautions should be taken.. So it’s exactly all these loopholes the proposed “underage intervention mechanism will address.
Q2: From your research, tell us how some other countries are dealing10 with the issue. Anything China can learn from?
Wu: Well, here I’ll use the US as an example. It is certainly not an example of a country with the best child welfare. According to US department of health and human services, for 2012, a nationally estimated 1,640 children died of abuse and neglect. But it’s exactly because there is a child abuse problem in the US and they are dealing with it, that we can get some insight. In the US, the Child Protective Services, basically a government funded social services agency, is the one responsible for finding out about child abuse and neglect. US laws actually require anybody who believes that a child has been abused or neglected to make a report to CPS. And the agency will assign caseworkers to investigate. And it doesn’t fight the fight alone, it gets a lot of support from the law enforcement agencies as well. After an investigation11, if your child is deemed not safe, your caseworker will determine if you need services to reduce the risk of abuse or if the child needs to be removed from your care. Certainly a system China can learn from.
1 appalling | |
adj.骇人听闻的,令人震惊的,可怕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 mechanism | |
n.机械装置;机构,结构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 deprivation | |
n.匮乏;丧失;夺去,贫困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 parental | |
adj.父母的;父的;母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 custody | |
n.监护,照看,羁押,拘留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 implement | |
n.(pl.)工具,器具;vt.实行,实施,执行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 specify | |
vt.指定,详细说明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 guardian | |
n.监护人;守卫者,保护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|