-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
Special English - US Ambassador Killed in Libya
I'm Avi Arditti with more news in Special English. We spoke1 with two VOA reporters about the killing2 of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans at the United States consulate3 in Benghazi, Libya.
Senior correspondent Andre DeNesnera says an anti-Muslim film incited4 anger, but knowing who was responsible for the attack may be very difficult.
ANDRE DeNESNERA: "One remembers that last year when the rebels were fighting at that time Col. Moammar Gadhafi, the leader of Libya, there were about one hundred separate opposition5 groups. And so they are in the process now of trying to consolidate6 the country and put together a government. Other experts believe it may be the work of Ghadaffi loyalists who are now using that [film] as a pretext7 for attacking the Americans, who are seen, of course, as the driving force behind the elimination8, the death, of Col. Gadhafi."
AA: "So much attention recently has been on Syria, with the ongoing9 conflict there. What is the situation in Libya. I know you just talked about it a little bit, but how close are they to a government?"
ANDRE DeNESNERA: "Still quite unstable10. Now that it's out of the headlines, it's difficult to try to get a reading on it. But what they are trying to do is put Libya back on the footing of a, quote unquote, normal country -- in other words, with the help of the United States, with the help of Europe. But this, of course, when you have the death of four Americans including an ambassador, it is quite a shocking event, at a time when one was more or less lulled11 into the Arab Spring."
AA: "And you've covered the State Department and diplomacy12 over the years. How significant is this, the death of an ambassador -- when was the last time?"
ANDRE DeNESNERA: "The last time, to knowledge, was in Afghanistan in nineteen seventy-nine, and there were only five ambassadors who were killed in the line of duty. But what is interesting is that the ambassador was ironically, during the Libyan campaign, military campaign, last year, was the representative of the United States to the opposition groups. So he was a well-known quantity, apparently13 someone who was well respected, a Middle scholar, and to lose someone of that caliber14 is devastating15."
VOA's Cecily Hilleary has been following reaction to Tuesday's attacks in Libya and on the American embassy in Cairo in social media from the Arab world and elsewhere.
CECILY HILLEARY: "There are questions as to why we would allow these kinds of things to be aired. At the same time you have Americans saying this is an overreaction, that Muslims are being baited, and Muslims are rising to the occasion, and that this justifies16 Islamaphobia."
AA: "That they are being baited into -- incited to violence."
CECILY HILLEARY: "Incited to violence, and then the violence feeds ... "
AA: "More violence."
CECILY HILLEARY: "More Islamaphobia. What I'm seeing in social media is that there is a huge misunderstanding between the two sides. This movie was perceived as something mainstream17, Hollywood, possibly even government sanction. You know, that's the Arab perspective."
AA: "Which ... "
CECILY HILLEARY: "Which of course it was not. What we know is very little. It's still early. But these are -- they are handheld cameras. This is an amateur production. The full film, to my knowledge, hasn't even aired, just a trailer appeared on YouTube. There are questions as to whether YouTube, a private company, should be held culpable18 for allowing it to stay on the site. You know, these are interesting questions. In the Arab world, yeah, YouTube would be sanctioned. In the United States, like it or not ... "
AA: "It's very rare for any action to be taken against freedom of speech."
CECILY HILLEARY: "But it opens up new questions about freedom of speech. We are very reluctant to give that up in the United States. And the reaction -- this is a political year. You're immediately seeing the two camps, Obama and Romney, kind of polarizing on social media."
That was VOA's Cecily Hilleary. I'm Avi Arditti.
1 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 killing | |
n.巨额利润;突然赚大钱,发大财 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 consulate | |
n.领事馆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 incited | |
刺激,激励,煽动( incite的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 consolidate | |
v.使加固,使加强;(把...)联为一体,合并 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 pretext | |
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 elimination | |
n.排除,消除,消灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 ongoing | |
adj.进行中的,前进的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 unstable | |
adj.不稳定的,易变的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 lulled | |
vt.使镇静,使安静(lull的过去式与过去分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 diplomacy | |
n.外交;外交手腕,交际手腕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 caliber | |
n.能力;水准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 devastating | |
adj.毁灭性的,令人震惊的,强有力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 justifies | |
证明…有理( justify的第三人称单数 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 mainstream | |
n.(思想或行为的)主流;adj.主流的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 culpable | |
adj.有罪的,该受谴责的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|