-
(单词翻译:双击或拖选)
U.S. lawmakers are describing as "disturbing" a report from the Government Accountability Office that says the Defense1 Department has been unable to account for tens of thousands of weapons supplied to Afghanistan's security forces. There are also concerns voiced in congressional hearings about the situation in Afghanistan and future U.S. strategy.
US soldier with NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) patrols Farah province (file)
The GAO report says the Defense Department failed to maintain adequate inventory2 controls for 36 percent, or about 87,000 of 242,000 weapons supplied during a four-year period ending in June 2008.
The weapons include assault rifles, machine guns, pistols, mortars3 and rocket-propelled grenade launchers supplied to Afghanistan's army and police.
The Defense Department could not provide serial4 numbers for about 46,000 of these weapons, and kept no reliable records for about 135,000 weapons obtained for Afghan forces by 21 countries or donors5.
Charles Johnson of the non-partisan Government Accountability Office was the first witness before the House National Security and Foreign Affairs Subcommittee.
"Lapses6 in accountability occurred at all phases of the supply chain, including when the weapons were obtained, transported to Afghanistan and stored at two central storage depots7 in Kabul," he said.
Johnson says the Defense Department failed to provide clear guidance to U.S personnel about procedures in handling weapons for Afghan security forces.
The Combined Security Transition Command - Afghanistan, or CSTCA, is responsible for receiving, storing and distributing weapons for Afghan forces.
The GAO report also found compromised accountability in how weapons were transported to Afghanistan, poor security at storage facilities, and no routine physical inventories8 conducted until July 2008.
Lawmakers say the findings raise disturbing questions about weapons that may have fallen into the hands of Taliban or al-Qaida forces, who staged attacks in Kabul this week.
"What if we had to tell those families [of American soldiers] not only why they were in Afghanistan, but why their son or daughter died at the hand of an insurgent9 using a weapon purchased by U.S. taxpayers10. But that is what we risk if we were to have tens of thousands of weapons we provided, washing around Afghanistan [and] off the books," said Committee chairman Democratic Representative John Tierney.
Principal Deputy Inspector11 General at the Pentagon, Thomas Gimble, outlines some of the steps the military has taken to correct problems.
"They also initiated12 formal procedures to ensure that serial numbers on weapons provided Afghan security forces are recorded in the DOD small arms, light weapons serialization program," he said.
In this hearing and another in the House Armed Services Committee, lawmakers and witnesses renewed concerns about the overall situation in Afghanistan.
Mark Schneider, Senior Vice13 President, International Crisis Group, says President Obama inherits a chaotic14 situation made worse by a disorganized U.S. and allied15 strategy.
"Strategic incoherence and inadequate16 coordination17 here in Washington, in Kabul, within the U.S. military, between the military and civilian18 government agencies, and between the U.S. and its international partners in Kabul are fatal to success in confronting the Taliban insurgency19," he said.
Drawing a contrast with Iraq, General Jack20 Keane, a former Army Vice Chief of Staff, says President Obama faces important decisions about how to proceed in Afghanistan.
"It is not just resources. We threw lots of resources at the problem in Iraq. Resources are crucial, I am not diminishing their importance, but it is how we use the resources, how we employ the troops. We had 150,000 troops and we were employing them the wrong way in Iraq and that is why for three years we were failing," he said.
President Obama has ordered a complete review of U.S. policy on Afghanistan and Pakistan, with his special envoy21 Richard Holbrooke holding talks in the region.
A Defense Department report in January said U.S.-led forces lacked the numbers and resources required to control the south of the country and effectively combat a strengthening insurgency.
1 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 inventory | |
n.详细目录,存货清单 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 mortars | |
n.迫击炮( mortar的名词复数 );砂浆;房产;研钵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 serial | |
n.连本影片,连本电视节目;adj.连续的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 donors | |
n.捐赠者( donor的名词复数 );献血者;捐血者;器官捐献者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 lapses | |
n.失误,过失( lapse的名词复数 );小毛病;行为失检;偏离正道v.退步( lapse的第三人称单数 );陷入;倒退;丧失 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 depots | |
仓库( depot的名词复数 ); 火车站; 车库; 军需库 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 inventories | |
n.总结( inventory的名词复数 );细账;存货清单(或财产目录)的编制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 insurgent | |
adj.叛乱的,起事的;n.叛乱分子 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 taxpayers | |
纳税人,纳税的机构( taxpayer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 inspector | |
n.检查员,监察员,视察员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 initiated | |
n. 创始人 adj. 新加入的 vt. 开始,创始,启蒙,介绍加入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 chaotic | |
adj.混沌的,一片混乱的,一团糟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 allied | |
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 inadequate | |
adj.(for,to)不充足的,不适当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 coordination | |
n.协调,协作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 civilian | |
adj.平民的,民用的,民众的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 insurgency | |
n.起义;暴动;叛变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 jack | |
n.插座,千斤顶,男人;v.抬起,提醒,扛举;n.(Jake)杰克 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 envoy | |
n.使节,使者,代表,公使 | |
参考例句: |
|
|